exclusion clauses Flashcards

1
Q

what is an exclusion clause?

A

any clause that attempts to exclude any liability entirely

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

what is a limitation clause?

A

a clause that attempts to restrict/limit a parties liability

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what are the 3 ways the court can try to control the power of exclusion clauses?

A
  • saying it was not incorporated into the contract
  • the contra proferentum rule
  • saying the clause is not effective under statute
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what does Thornton v Shoe Lane Parking say?

A

that the general rule for exclusion is that the more onerous the exclusion, the clearer it must be

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

what does L’Estrange v Graucob say?

A

that if a contract is signed then it is incorporated even if not read or understood

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

what is the exception for the rule from L’Estrange? what is the case?

A
  • Interfoto v Stiletto
  • clauses with onerous terms may not be incorporated if specific attention is not drawn to it
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

what does Curtis v Chemical cleaning and dyeing say?

A

exclusion clauses must not be contradicted via oral statements

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

what does Chapelton v BUDC say?

A

that if there is nothing pointing to the fact there is an exclusion before contract is made it will not be incorporated

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

what does Parker v SE Railway say?

A

if there is a clear indication of the exclusion before the contract is signed then it will be implied

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

what does O’Brien v MGN say?

A

that if D took reasonable steps to warn C about the exclusion, it will be incorporated

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

what does Hollier v Rambler Motors say?

A

if the dealings were not regular enough then this will not be a valid exclusion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

what does Spurling v Bradshaw say?

A

that if the parties had frequent enough dealings to create a ‘regular course of dealings’ then c should’ve known about the exclusion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

what is Contra Proferentum?

A

where courts will interpret the clause against the party relying on it

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

why did the excusion work in Transocean Drilling UK v Providence Resources?

A

-clause was clear in how it works and was repeated multiple times
-both parties agreed to the term
-both parties were businesses so had the power to negotiate with each other

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

who does the CRA apply to?

A

B2C

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

who does the UCA apply to?

A

B2B, C2C

17
Q

what is the unfairness test and where does it come from?

A

-s62 of CRA
-a term is unfair if it is causing a significant imbalance in the parties rights and obligations
-aka, when the term puts a consumer at a disadvantage by limiting their rights or increasing their obligations significantly

18
Q

what are the 3 exceptions to the unfairness test?

A

-exclusion clauses about implied rights to goods are automatically unfair (s31), as well as exclusion clauses about implied rights to services (s57)

19
Q

what is the Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977 (UCTA)?

A

a statute that is much narrower than CRA, as it only applies to exclusion clauses

20
Q

what does s2(1) of UCTA say?

A

manufacturers, owners of premises or suppliers of services cannot exclude liability for death or personal injury caused by negligence

21
Q

what does s2(2) of UCTA say?

A

suppliers of services, manufacturers or owners of premises can exclude liability for causing property damage caused by negligence so as it is reasonable

22
Q

what does s3 of UCTA say?

A

parties can exclude liability for breach of contract if the clause is reasonable

23
Q

what does UCTA look at to see whether a clause is reasonable?

A

-s11(1) exclusion clauses in general
-s11(2) exclusion clauses about implied terms

24
Q

what does s11(1) UCTA say?

A

the term must have been reasonable based on what was known to the parties at the time of the contract - this is the knowledge test

25
Q

what does s11(2) UCTA say?

A

-meant to be used in implied terms for goods and services, but in reality applies to all B2B exclusions
-look at guidelines in schedule 2

26
Q

what are the 5 things set out in schedule 2?

A

-the relative strength of bargaining power
-whether the consumer received any inducement to agree to the term
-whether the buyer should have known about the term
-whether the goods were made to the special order of a customer
-whether liability is accepted only if certain conditions are complied with