Voluntary Manslaughter Ch6 Y2 Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What are the 2 defences that turn murder into voluntary manslaughter?

A

Diminished Responsibility
Loss of Control

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

what are the sentencing guidelines for Voluntary manslaughter?

A

Upto a maximum of life
long term hospital order

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What section and act defines Loss of control?

A

S54(1) of the Coroners and Justice act 2009

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What are the three points that must be proven for Loss of Control

A

D’s acts or omissions resulted from his loss of control

Loss of control resulted from a qualifying trigger

A person of d’s sex and age, with a normal degree of of tolerance and self restraint would reacted in the same way, given the circumstances

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Who has the burden of proof when loss of control is suggested?

A

The prosecution has the burden of disproving. but the defendent must make “more than a bare assertion (R v Jewell)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

what cases relate to the loss of control itself?

A

R v Gurnipar
R v Jewell
R v Ahluwalia

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What does S54(2) state? + supporting case

A

The loss of control does not have to be sudden.
R v Ahluwalia

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What Section of the Coroners and Justice act defines Qualifying trigger?

A

S55

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What are the 2 possible qualifying triggers, and the subsections of them

A

S55(3) ) Defendant held fear of serious violence from the victim against D or another identified Person

S55(4) ) Things done or said which

  A) Constitute circumstances of an extremely grave character AND
  B) Caused D to have a justified sense of being seriously wronged
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What does R v Dawes state?

A

D cannot rely on fear of serious violence if he induced that violence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Who decides whether D’s sense of being seriously wronged is justifiable?

A

The jury

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What does S54(4) state?
(Loss of control(

A

The defence is not allowed if the defendant acted in a “considered desire for revenge”

ie, if defendant had the time to consider revenge, the defence fails.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What does R v Rejmanski State?

A

D is judged against the standard of a person with a normal degree of tolerance and self restraint

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What section and act is Diminished responsibility defined and ammended in?

A

S2 of the homicide act 1957 as ammended by S52 of the coroners and justice act 2009

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is the first part of diminished responsibility?

A

D suffered from an abnormality of mental functioning which:

1)Arose from a recognised medical condition
2)substantialy impaired D’s ability to do one or more things in SS 1 A
3)provides an explanation for D’s acts and omissions in doing the killing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What are the three things that can be impaired by D’s recognised medical condition

A

To understand the nature of their conduct
To form a rational judgement
To exercice self control

17
Q

Who has the burden of proof for diminished responsibility

A

Defendant, but only on the balance of probablities

18
Q

what is meant by an abnormality of the mind?

A

a state of mind so different from that of an ordinary person, that the reasonable person would term it abnormal.

19
Q

how is a “recognised medical condition” determined?

A

if it is in the WHO classification of diseases

20
Q

what case defines “substantial” and what is that definition?

A

R v Golds
of some importance or was a serious degree of the thing

21
Q

what is meant by “unable to understand the nature of their conduct”?

A

D is in an automatic state

22
Q

What is meant by ability to form a rational judgement?

A

cant understand what theyre doing.

for schizos, paranioa and such

23
Q

what is meant by S2(1)(C)

A

the abnormality of mental functioning must be a significant factor in the killing