voluntary and involunary intoxication Flashcards
voluntary intoxication
Majewski- distinction between specific and basic intent crimes
specific intent crimes
crimes involving intention only (murder, GBH, theft etc) defence will be available if D could not form men’s rea due to being intoxicated
basic intent crimes
crimes that can be committed recklessly (manslaughter, assault etc), defence not available as D being intoxicated in first place shows recklessness
RICHARDSON & IRWIN
defence of voluntary intoxication may still be available for basic intent crimes but only if D would not have seen risk of harm even when sober
involuntary intoxication KINGSTON
defence is available for both specific and basic intent but only if D so intoxicated they couldn’t form men’s rea “a drugged intent is still intent”
side rule: unexpected side effect of prescription drugs
HARDIE- defence of involuntary intoxication can be used
side rule: DUTCH courage rule
GALLAGHER- no defence as had clearly formed intention before drinking