Virtue Ethics Flashcards
Origins of Virtue Ethics
• began with Aristotle (384-322 BCE)
• the ancient Greeks recognised virtue as a central element of ethical thinking
• the emphasis that the theory puts on the whole person is typical of the ancient Greeks
• Aristotle was focused on purpose, not the outcome or the action itself
Our Purpose according to Aristotle
• all things have a purpose according to Aristotle, a Telos
• our purpose is to become happy by becoming virtuous
• Aristotle focused not on what people do, but on what kind of a person they are. This takes practise, not just one action
Eudaimonia
living a good happy life, literally translates to human flourishing
• intrinsic value - pursued for its own merits not as a means to an end but an end in itself, to try and be good is to be good
• beneficial for individuals and for society
• Eudaimonia must be deserved by
developing virtuous character traits and avoiding negative ones, thus they will be
completely moral - by choice
-we should not act in a particular way because they ought to or because they want to, but because they have identified it as the right way to act
-Humans are like archers aiming for a target (goodness)
-we achieve Eudaimonia through practice and education
Virtues and Vices
Virtues: positive character traits which promote individual and collective well-being. They belong to a morally good person.
Vices: negative characteristics that do not promote individual well-being. They belong to a morally bad person.
a virtuous person who has truly grasped goodness is always good without having to think about it
there must be a continuous effort
Alastair Macintyre on relativism
Points out that different virtues have been prized by different societies and at different points in history (cultural and temporal relativism). Virtue Ethics is therefore a morally relativist, non-cognitivist theory.
This does not rule out morality involving rationality or real evaluation; simply that it is not universal.
Moral statements are evaluative facts relative to culturally varying goals.
Virtue ethics should not be used by itself, but alongside a list of moral rules, although Aristotle would argue that virtue is the centre of morality and sufficient to provide moral guidance.
St Ambrose’s Christian Virtues
St Ambrose (340-397) defined the following Greek virtues as the four cardinal virtues:
• courage
• justice
• temperance
• wisdom
-He took the following from St.Paul and these became known as the three theological virtues:
• faith
• hope
• love (charity from Greek ‘caritas’)
The Golden Mean
Aristotle believed in the middle path between two extremes:
• deficiency is a vice
• the golden mean is a virtue
• excess is a vice
Intellectual and Moral Virtues
Intellectual Virtue: formed through teaching and experience
Moral Virtue: formed through habit
Aristotle thought intelligence was not enough to be virtuous, he believed that man must also have practical morals or ‘moral virtues’:
• Courage: to put oneself at risk for a greater good
• Temperance: self restraint
• Liberality: open-mindedness/generosity
• Magnificence: good taste, achievement
• Greatness of soul: knowledge of self worth
• Good temper or gentleness: control of emotions
• Being agreeable in company: being reasonable and amiable
• Wittiness: good humour
• Modesty: humbleness, not boastful
Aristotle’s sides to becoming fully human
-Acts one should avoid, things that diminish us
-Acts one should develop as habits, those things which make us more human/develop virtues
How is Virtue Ethics different to Utilitarianism and Natural Moral Law?
it is not a guide to decision making but a description of a good life
other theories look at how we should act and this looks at how we should live our lives
it is interested in the whole person, not just their actions and the consequences of those actions
NML/Kant: I ought to do this, Aristotle: I act in this way because it is right
according to virtue ethics, we are judged by…
our character: rather than specific actions
• an individual who has developed virtues is judged as good
• an individual who has developed vices is judged as bad
• most of us have a mixture of virtues and vices
• to develop virtues we need virtuous role models
How do we become Virtuous
• by doing virtuous acts
• brave acts nurture bravery for example
• we get better with practice
• the virtuous life is a happy one and we enjoy acting virtuously
• it is a developmental process and requires moral education
Advantages of Virtue Ethics
• suitable for religious and secular
• universal well being for whole community
• emphasis on pleasure and emotion- it is good that we enjoy acting virtuously
• moral education- being moral is a developmental process
• no decision procedure- moral decision making is too complicated to have a single criterion for decision
• does not set unrealistic goals
Disadvantages of Virtue Ethics
• offers no solution to specific moral dilemmas or situations where virtues conflict
• not everyone has the equal opportunity to develop morally- do we judge them the same?
• many non-virtuous people live happy lives, many virtuous people are miserable
• cultural relativism: how do we know which virtues are good
• people might consider different people to be desirable role models
• golden mean isn’t easy to apply to all virtues
• selfish theory? more focused on our actions and development
• virtues have changed (masculinity and bravery)
Intellectual Virtues
virtues of the mind such as the ability to understand, reason and make sound judgement
Moral Virtues: not innate, are acquired through repetition and practice. Virtues become second nature over time
Elizabeth Anscombe
(1919-2001):
• Anscombe developed virtue ethics in the later 20th century
• she believed in developing virtues from which good actions would follow and called this ‘human flourishing’
• argues that ethical codes which put a stress on moral absolutes and laws are useless in a society that has effectively abandoned God
Richard Taylor
• rejected a system of morality which was based on divine commands and discouraged people from achieving their potential
• e argued that the emphasis Christianity put on human equality does no encourage individuals to strive to be great but advocates humility, which is not enough
Philippa Foot
• one of the founders of OXFAM
• argued that although the virtues cannot guarantee happiness, they can go some way to achieving it
• many people often argue that virtues may be used to a bad end, Foot stated this is wrong, seeing as a virtue is only virtuous when used to the right end
• he said that loyalty- a virtue- isn’t a virtue when used to a bad end- for example, loyalty to hitler
Alistair Macintyre
• argued that in moral dilemmas, naturalistic theories of ethics are of little value as they are time consuming and overly complicated
• a virtue based approach to ethics is more realistic and applicable to people’s everyday situations
Arete
means ‘excellence’
usually in reference to parts operating as they should
virtue is a state of character which brings about the excellence of something and make all acts by somebody excellent
Different seekers of happiness according to Aristotle
Pleasure seekers: these are people who are driven by their basic desires and simply live from one pleasurable experience to the next: e.g. eating good food, sleeping, drinking and having sex.
Seekers of honour: Aristotle saw politicians as seekers of honour. These are people who try to find solutions to important problems and get a sense of honour from doing that.
Those who love contemplation: these are philosophers and thinkers.
Aristotle believed that the lowest forms of happiness are those found by the pleasure seekers. He wrote: ‘The utter servility of the masses comes out in their preference for a bovine [animalistic] existence.’
Where might a virtue (golden mean) lie relative to defect and excess?
not necessarily evenly between defect and excess
recklessness is closer to courage than cowardice is
Thick and Thin concepts
Thick: have an evaluative aspect to them: courage, rudeness
Thin: good and bad, easier to just call a description of emotions resulting from moral actions
Robert Nozick
challenges the idea that, because we uniquely are able to reason, reasoning is our purpose
“If man turned out to be unique only in having a sense of humour, would it follow that he should concentrate his energies on inventing and telling jokes?”
