Situation Ethics Flashcards
Intellectual Background of Situation Ethics
Religious believers believed hat God reveals moral laws to them and that these are always to be applied. It is impossible to be good without following them.
-Kant’s deontological approach: Moral rules are good in themselves and should be obeyed regardless of consequences. They comprise a moral duty that is binding to all.
Social Background of Situation Ethics
• sexual revolution, freedom and contraception
• freedom for women after they worked in the war
• Counter/Youth culture
• Civil rights movement
• distrust of government with Vietnam war
The Church’s reaction to changes in moral perspectives
BCC 1964: appointed a working party to “Prepare a statement for the Christian case for abstinence from sexual intercourse before marriage and faithfulness within marriage… and to suggest means whereby the Christian position may be effectively presented to the various sections of a community”
Made use of the Schofield report (The Sexual Behaviour of Young People 1965)
Reflected opinion that there had been a general lowering of moral standards.
Aimed to promote “a sane and responsible attitude towards love and marriage”
Michael Schofield’s ‘The Sexual Behaviour of Young People’
Identified the new influences on young people:
“greater independence; more money in their pockets and purses; the weakening of family bonds and religious influences; the development of earlier maturity, physically, emotionally and mentally; the impact of modern books, television [and] periodicals”
J.A.T. Robinsons ‘Honest to God’
1963
God is not a literal being “up there” above the universe
-agrees with Tillich that God is the “ground of our being” who, although significant, is not a supernatural being who intervenes with the universe
-Fletcher: had written that Christian ethics was “not a scheme of codified conduct. It is a purposive effort to relate love to a world of relativities through a casuistry obedient to love”
Bishop of Woolwich and BCC working party’s observations on Christian morality
Bishop of Woolwich: “the gulf must grow wider before it is bridged”
Working Party of the BCC (British Council of Churches): “there is a real uncertainty about what is the proper basis for Christian moral judgement”
Fletcher, Robinson and the New Testament
Fletcher and Robinson used New Testament dialogues between Jesus and the Pharisees.
• Pharisees applied legalistic Jewish morals to ethical situations while Jesus went to first principles.
• The story of the adulterous woman shows Jesus applying principles of love, compassion etc, demonstrating the weakness of using absolute laws for individual cases.
Fletcher: “Bultmann was correct in saying that Jesus had no ethics if we accept…ethics was a system of values and rules”
Morality as Situationally variable
Robinson: People had to respond situationally not prescriptively to show true value, no “packaged” moral judgements
Joseph Fletcher: “The morality of an action depends on the situation”
Reactions to Situation Ethics
Situationist or existential ethics were not instantly popular
• 1956, Pope Pius XII banned the view from seminaries
• Protestant reaction was also suspicious as situation ethics declares nothing can be labelled wrong
Joseph Fletcher general information
• 1905-1991
• American professor who founded the theory of situation ethics in the 1960s
• was a pioneer in bioethics and was involved in the areas of abortion, infanticide, euthanasia and cloning
• he was a priest who later renounced his belief in God and became an atheist
Fletcher identified three ways of making moral decisions
-legalistic
-antinomian: no standard
-situation ethics
Legalistic Ethics (and Fletcher’s opinion)
• has a set of moral rules and regulations
• Judaism and Christianity both have legalistic ethical traditions
• Fletcher said this runs into problems- life’s complexities require additional laws. Murder, killing in self defence, killing in war, killing unborn human beings etc
• becomes complex and like a textbook morality that leaves people simply to check the manual to decide what is right and wrong
Antinomian Ethics (and Fletcher’s opinion)
• the reverse of legalistic ethics
• it literally means ‘against law’
• a person using antinomianism doesn’t really use an ethical system at all
• he or she enters decision-making as if each occasion was totally unique
• making a moral decision is a matter of spontaneity, being adhoc, casual and unprincipled
• Fletcher is also critical of this approach as it is unprincipled
Situation Ethics
• One single rule - the rule of agape. This love is not merely an emotion but involves wanting what is best for the other person, unconditionally
• The situationist enters into the moral dilemma with the principles and rules of their community
• However, they are prepared to set these rules aside in the situation if love seems better served by doing so
• “The situationist follows a moral law or violates it according to love’s need”
• all moral decisions are hypothetical, lying could be a good thing if it serves love, giving to charity is only good if it is the loving thing to do
• no universal moral rules or rights- each case is unique and deserves a unique solution
Application of Situation Ethics to divorce
• Robinson: no supernatural bond occurs, it is an outdated idea. Love may be best served by leaving behind supernaturalist laws
• Fletcher and Robinson emphasised agapé love as the only intrinsically good thing. Barclay defines it as “unconquerable good will..the determination to seek the other man’s highest good”
• employing agapé may situationally require ignoring laws
• Fletcher: if “emotional and spiritual welfare…can be served best by a divorce…then love requires it”
Fletcher’s principles (general)
Situation ethic is sensitive to variety and complexity. It uses principles to illuminate the situation, but not to direct the action.
-Fletcher divides his principles into two categories:
• The four working principles
• The six fundamental principles