Vested and Contingent Remainders Flashcards
A VESTED REMAINDER
…is one in which the remainderman’s right to immediate possession is without pre-conditions (except expiration of the the prior estate).
“to A for life, remainder to B and his heirs”
A VESTED REMAINDER
A CONTINGENT REMAINDER
A CONTINGENT REMAINDER is one in which the remainderman’s right to immediate possession is subject to a condition precedent [pree-SEE-dent].
“to A for life, remainder to B and her heirs if B marries C.”
A CONTINGENT REMAINDER
There are 3 basic ways that a remainder can be “contingent.”
A remainder is contingent if it is:
- Subject to occurrence of some stated event - “… remainder to B and her heirs if B marries C”
- Conveyed to unascertained persons – “… remainder to B’s first child to reach age 21, and his or her heirs”
- Conveyed to unborn persons – “… remainder to B’s next born child and his or her heirs”
“… remainder to B and her heirs if B marries C”
“contingent.”
“… remainder to B’s first child to reach age 21, and his or her heirs”
“contingent.”
“… remainder to B’s next born child and his or her heirs
“contingent.”
DEFINITION of a VESTED REMAINDER (long-form):
A remainder is vested if the remainderman is:
(a) born and
(b) ascertained, and
(c) no (stated) event need occur before possession (except expiration of the prior, particular estate).
DEFINITION of a CONTINGENT REMAINDER:
A remainder is contingent if any of the following applies:
- a stated event must occur before possession
- it is to unascertained persons
- it is to unborn persons
Thus, whenever the:
unascertained become ascertained, or
the unborn are born, or
the stated event occurs
the contingent remainder becomes vested.
In addition to the basic distinction between:
vested remainders, and
contingent remainders
there are also various subcategories of vested remainders:
indefeasibly vested,
vested subject to divestment, and
vested subject to open
Of the distinctions among vested remainders, perhaps the most important is the difference between:
indefeasibly vested remainders, and
vested remainders subject to divestment
As you’ve probably gathered by now, one main issue surrounding “vested remainders subject to divestment” is how to distinguish them from contingent remainders.
The “official” difference is shown in the table.
Contingent: Condition Precedent
“It will be yours if so-and-so occurs”
Vested Subject to Divestment: Condition Subsequent
“It’s yours, but you’ll lose it if so-and-so occurs”
Do the following conveyances create a vested or contingent remainders in C?
“to B for life, then to C and her heirs, but if C dies childless, then to D and her heirs”
The answer is vested. This conveyance creates a remainder to a person who is born and ascertained and there is no “stated event” condition precedent to possession by the remainderman (except expiration of the prior estate).
The condition on this remainder is a condition subsequent. The words of conveyance grant the remainder to C without pre-condition, but then set up an after-the-fact condition that can later cut off her rights, in favor of D.
Do the following conveyances create a vested or contingent remainders in C?
“to B for life, then to C and his heirs if C goes straight to college after high school, otherwise to D and her heirs”
The words of conveyance set up a pre-condition that must be met before C can have a right to immediate possession, thus giving him a contingent remainder. In fact, this conveyance creates two contingent remainders, sometimes referred to as “alternative contingent remainders.”
The non-occurrence of the stated event for C’s condition precedent is worded to be also the occurrence of the stated event for D’s condition precedent.
Do the following conveyances create a vested or contingent remainders in C?
“to B for life, then to C and his heirs, but if C predeceases B, then to D and her heirs”
The answer is vested. C’s remainder bears none of the earmarks of a contingent remainder (unborn; unascertained; pre-conditional stated event). So it’s vested, but subject to divestment.
The condition on this remainder is a condition subsequent. The words of conveyance grant the remainder to C without pre-condition, but then set up an after-the-fact condition that can later cut off his rights, in favor of D.