VE Flashcards

1
Q

Embryo research therapeutic

A

-In modern VE the key virtue of focus is compassion, where empathy and understanding for the plight of others is important.

-Compassion is likely to focus on people whose well-being is destroyed by disease, rather than a collection of cells in a petri dish.

-may be suggested helping couples who are unable to naturally conceive children, or stem cell research and cloning to find cures to Parkinson’s or Alzheimer’s could be viewed as morally acceptable and virtuous, as it removes suffering.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Eudaimonia

A

-The concept of eudaimonia may be helpful here. Stem cell research offers cures to paralysis, Parkinson’s disease, and many other seriously debilitating conditions.

-Designer babies could develop the intellectual virtue of practical wisdom, creating a society that makes virtuous choices and a society of flourishing.

-These conditions are not part of the eudaimonian ideal. Eudaimonia is complete happiness, and such a state would not be possible with the agony of such conditions.

-Just as we should strive to develop our character, we should prevent things that stand in the way of eudaimonia.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Designer babies

A

-How well can we tell character traits and dispositions of designer babies? With trans-humans (super humans) individuals may be bred for specific purposes.

-I.e. excessive aggression in a solider, could act at the extreme of uncontrolled anger and malice.

-The dispositions Aristotle would classify as virtuous, may not match the character traits of trans-humans in the future.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Other issues

A

-Physical & mental modification of humans is probably inevitable - problems as future development will likely result in a society where new virtues will be developed & key ones will be lost - virtuous future humans will be different to current virtuous humans. It is unlikely there could be a set of recognisable virtues across a range of human types.

-arguable that the teleological aspect of Virtue Ethics will be lost, as there is no common set of virtues that will produce a person of practical wisdom who can achieve eudaimonia.

-in the short term, offers opportunity to increase human well-being & develop virtues of courage & vision through the removal of diseases. Failure to use PGD where it could prevent suffering makes medics/parents responsible for that suffering.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Weaknesses of DB

A

-Designer babies produced to save the lives or health of their siblings or parents would know that they have been brought into existence solely to satisfy a need and not out of love for their own existence.

-If the creation of saviour babies is allowed, will society view such new human beings as mere instruments for the good of others.

-could cause serious socio-political, economic, ethical and religious upheavals in societies that have only just began to realise and embrace human rights and the individual’s personal rights.

-Children should be created and loved for their uniqueness and not for the ulterior purpose of helping another sibling.

-doctors and parents playing “God”? Do they have the right?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Abortion

A

-Aristotle says in his Politicsthat if parents have too many children, abortion should be brought about:

“… before sense and life have begun”

-Abortion here is a matter for the rules of the city state.

-For Aristotle then abortion should take place before a human person is present.

-It is better to abort potential babies rather than actual babies.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Aristotle quote

A

“… before sense and life have begun”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Rosalind hursthouse - abortion

A

-Abortion is a moral issue that has little to do with what the rules about abortion might say, and nothing to do with someone’s rights.

-Acting within your rights does not mean you are acting virtuously: you might be acting callously or viciously.

-The morality of abortion also has nothing to do with whether or not the foetus is a person – we do not yet have enough biological facts.

-The act of abortion is not the same as deciding whether or not to have a tooth out: it is very much a decision about ending a life or not.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Rosalind Hursthouse - virtues of a woman

A

-“The virtuous woman has such character traits as strength, independence, resoluteness, decisiveness, self-confidence, responsibility, serious mindedness and self determination”

-These are virtues that count, and depending on the situation, they are what should govern whether an abortion takes place

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Rosalind Hursthouse - quote about boys

A

Equally men and boys:
“can, in their actions, manifest self-centredness, callousness and light mindedness about life and parenthood in relation to abortion. They can be self-centered or courageous about the possibility of disability in their offspring; they need to reflect on their sexual activity… and take responsibility for their own actions and life in relation to fatherhood.”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Capital punishment

A

-CP is not discussed by Aristotle

-CP was used in Athenian society.

-Justice was an important concept for Aristotle.

-Justice has no excess or defieincy; it is altruistic.
Aristotle says, in justice

“…every virtue is summed up”

In some sense justice is a balancing act. If someone steals, then the thief can make it up to their victim by restoring to them the property they have stolen.

If someone takes a life, then their life can be taken. This is justice?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Aristotle justice quote

A

“…every virtue is summed up”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Aristotle - CP

A

-As we saw in the section on Aristotle’s virtue ethics, in one sense justice is about balancing the distribution of gain and loss between two people.

-where one person murders another, the balance still has to be rectified, even though the victim is dead, and the only way this can be done is for the state to kill the murderer. Perhaps, then, this is how Aristotle would deal with the issue of capital punishment.

-In terms of what Aristotle says about voluntary actions, we are clearly responsible for any actions we intend.

-If someone murders someone else for vicious reasons, through the vices of spite, malevolence, hatred, envy, jealousy, anger or lust, then this is simply a matter for justice.

-A person of practical wisdom behaves justly quite simply by obeying the law and by being seen to obey it.

-For somebody who voluntarily and viciously disobeys the law by murder, then justice really requires restoration in kind, which may require capital punishment.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Euthanasia

A

-If a person is in a state where he or she is no longer able to achieve eudaimonia, then further living would seem to be pointless, in which case Aristotle might accept that voluntary euthanasia or assisted suicide are the courageous option.

-Alternatively, enduring pain might be equally courageous, depending on one’s disposition and occupation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Aristotle + suicide

A

-We define murder as the victim NOT wanting to die, therefore, voluntary euthanasia or assisted suicide would not be classified as murder.

-Likewise, some would say that virtues of compassion or charity above justice.

-HOWEVER, Aristotle opposed suicide, viewing it as a base and cowardly act, going against the virtue of courage.

-Arguably, it also goes against the virtue of justice, as it deprives society of a citizen.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

VE Euthanasia

A

-Virtue Ethics does not show us how to act in such a situation: the decision depends on practical wisdom.

-In the modern context, which virtues should govern the actions of doctors when confronted with people who ask to be euthanized because of unbearable pain and the imminence of death

-Rules cannot decide on the rightness of wrongness of voluntary euthanasia and assisted suicide: only virtues can decide

17
Q

Virtue relativism

A

Virtue relativism - Aristotle agreed with virtue relativism.

Each individual needs to work out their own eudemonic life.

Therefore a patient must ask can he or she flourish as a human being still?

18
Q

Changing virtues - euthanasia

A

-Aristotle also agreed that virtues can change across society and an individual should try to live up to the virtues of their society.

-Therefore we must ask would euthanasia fit in with the kind of society we are in?

19
Q

Moral virtue

A

-To which we might answer that “liberality” is a British value – a British moral virtue.

-We value tolerance, acceptance and freedom of choice.

-So we therefore should give people the freedom of choice and accept the act of euthanasia.

20
Q

Virtuous Character:

A

-Virtue Ethics would emphasize the importance of individuals cultivating virtuous character traits, such as compassion, empathy, and wisdom.

-In the case of euthanasia, a virtuous person would consider the well-being and suffering of the patient as well as the consequences of their actions on others.

21
Q

Golden Mean

A

-Aristotle’s concept of the “golden mean” suggests that virtue lies between two extremes.

-Virtue Ethics would encourage individuals to find a balance between preserving life at all costs and actively causing death.

-It promotes thoughtful decision-making based on circumstances. Virtues such as benevolence, justice, and integrity should be considered, when deciding if euthanasia is morally justifiable in a given situation.

22
Q

Phronesis (Practical Wisdom)

A

-Virtue Ethics places great importance on practical wisdom, or “phronesis.”

-Making decisions about euthanasia would require individuals to exercise practical wisdom in evaluating the unique circumstances and the patient’s best interests.

23
Q

Strengths of euthanasia within VE

A

-Emphasis on Virtuous Character: Virtue Ethics places a strong emphasis on developing virtuous character traits such as compassion, empathy, and wisdom. In cases of euthanasia, this focus can lead to morally sound decisions that prioritize the well-being and dignity of the patient, family, and healthcare professionals.

-Contextual Approach: Virtue Ethics allows for a contextual approach to ethical dilemmas. It recognizes that each euthanasia case is unique, and decisions should be made considering the specific circumstances, aligning with the principles of practical wisdom.

24
Q

Weaknesses of euthanasia within VE

A

-Lack of Clear Rules: Virtue Ethics can seem vague and does not provide specific rules or guidelines for actions, which can be a weakness in situations that require clear moral guidance. This complexity can make it difficult for individuals to arrive at clear, universally applicable conclusions.

-Subjectivity: Virtue Ethics relies on the moral character of the decision-maker, which can lead to subjectivity in assessing whether a decision is virtuous. Different individuals may interpret virtues differently, potentially leading to inconsistent conclusions about euthanasia.

-Potential for Virtue Manipulation: In the context of euthanasia, there’s a risk that individuals might manipulate virtues to justify their personal or institutional interests. This could be ethically problematic, especially when dealing with vulnerable patients.

25
Q

Strengths of abortion within VE

A

-Emphasis on Virtuous Character: Virtue Ethics focuses on the development of virtuous character traits, which can guide individuals in making morally informed decisions regarding abortion. This approach encourages people to cultivate qualities like compassion, courage, and wisdom.

-Flexibility: Virtue Ethics doesn’t rely on rigid rules or absolutes, allowing for flexibility in moral decision-making. This is valuable when addressing complex issues like abortion, where circumstances vary widely.

-Promotes Moral Development: Virtue Ethics is concerned with long-term moral development. It encourages individuals to strive for personal growth and the flourishing of virtuous character traits, which can lead to better decision-making over time.

26
Q

Weaknesses of abortion within VE

A

-Lack of Clear Guidance: Virtue Ethics doesn’t provide clear-cut rules for determining whether abortion is morally right or wrong.

-Cultural Variation: Virtue Ethics can be influenced by cultural and individual differences in defining virtues. What’s considered virtuous may vary, leading to differing views on abortion in different cultural contexts.

-Subjectivity: The emphasis on individual character and personal virtues can introduce subjectivity into moral judgments. What one person views as a virtuous decision regarding abortion, another may disagree with based on their personal virtues.

27
Q

Strengths of embryo research within VE

A

-Focus on Character Development: Virtue ethics encourages people to cultivate qualities like empathy, compassion, and wisdom, which are vital when making ethical decisions related to sensitive topics like embryo research, which would bring about cures to end diseases that cause suffering.

-Flexibility: Virtue ethics doesn’t rely on rigid rules, allowing for a nuanced and context-specific approach to ethical dilemmas, which is crucial when dealing with complex issues in bioethics.

-Long-Term Well-Being: Virtue ethics, with its focus on eudaimonia or human flourishing, emphasizes the long-term well-being of individuals and society. The long-term impact of finding cures to diseases could contribute to the flourishing of society overall.

28
Q

Weaknesses of embryo research within VE

A

-Enhancement of Superficial Virtues: There’s a risk that designer baby technology might prioritize superficial traits like physical appearance or intelligence over deeper virtues like empathy, kindness, and moral character. This could lead to a society that values external qualities more than internal virtues.

-Inequality and Discrimination: Designer babies may exacerbate social inequalities. Wealthier individuals or countries might have greater access to genetic enhancements, creating disparities and potential discrimination based on genetic makeup.

-Ethical Slippery Slope: Virtue ethics acknowledges the potential for a slippery slope when it comes to genetic manipulation. Once we begin altering the genetic makeup of offspring for seemingly good reasons, it becomes challenging to establish clear boundaries, raising concerns about where the ethical line should be drawn.

-Devaluation of Natural Birth: Virtue ethics emphasizes the value of natural processes. Designer babies might be seen as a departure from the natural process of conception and childbirth, potentially diminishing the significance and sanctity of these events.

29
Q

Strenghts of CP within VE

A

-Justice and Retribution: Virtue ethicists may argue that capital punishment can be a just response to heinous crimes, aligning with the virtue of justice. It can provide a sense of retribution, which some consider necessary for moral balance.

-Deterrence and Protection: In cases where capital punishment effectively deters others from committing grave crimes, virtue ethicists might see this as promoting the common good and protecting society, reflecting the virtues of prudence and courage.

-Responsibility and Accountability: Executing individuals who have committed terrible crimes can be seen as holding them accountable for their actions, fostering personal responsibility, which aligns with moral virtues like accountability and integrity.

30
Q

Weaknesses of CP within VE

A

-Human Fallibility: Virtue ethicists may be concerned about the fallibility of the justice system. Capital punishment, if applied to innocent individuals, contradicts virtues like justice and compassion. The risk of error challenges the notion of practical wisdom.

-Dehumanization: The process of capital punishment may lead to the dehumanization of those involved in execution, such as executioners and witnesses. Virtue ethicists would find this problematic, as it goes against virtues like compassion, empathy, and respect for all human life.

-Lack of Rehabilitation: Capital punishment eliminates the possibility of rehabilitation and personal growth for the offender, hindering the development of virtues like forgiveness and the belief in the potential for moral change.