US Flashcards

1
Q

the case + democratization

A

US important: global influence

next electoins: nov 5th 2024 (Harris leading the polls since august)

system copy pasted to Brazil and Nigeria (Brazil started with Westminster-Whitehall idea, but changed)

1783 independence from England

gradual democratization + overall high levels of democracy: bc no absolute monarchy or smth

recent years: decline democracy + after WW2 slow continuing democratization (unlike EU): civil rights not optimal yet (e.g. only in 60s attention to minority rights)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

culture and nation

A

50 states (incl. Hawaii and Alaska since 1959)

splended isolation -> relatively free from external enemies
(some wars with Mexico over e.g. Texas)

demography =

  • white majority = Italians, Irish used to be discriminated against = declining due to migration and lower birth rates
  • African Americans (origins: slavery)
  • Indians (in specific racial reserves)
  • Muslim (relatively small but growing)

white majority feels under threat transnational cleavage -> feel left behind (e.g. bc affirmative action policies) -> exclusive nationalism and nativism

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

historical dev. colonies + revo

A

13 colonies east coast with many settlers: fertile land + pelgrims (with negative conception of the state, bc they left the strong state)

  • !!!! situation as settler colony diff than e.g. Algeria and Nigeria: settlers wanted the independence (Algeria and Nigeria: indigenous wanted independence)

settlers got own insitutions over time + eventually didn’t want to be attached to the UK any more -> Boston Tea Party: No taxation without representation

1765-1783 revolution and independence

1781 = articles of confederation
federalists vs antifederalists
1787 = constitutional convention
1789 put into effect = oldest in the world

liberal democr. idea: making sure that every state has rights

1789-1791 = Bill of Rights

  • incl. second amendment: protects right to keep/bear arms
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

(Bill of Rights)

A

1789-91

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

civil war

A

1861-65

North = industrialization
South = slavery, agriculture

-> regional cleavage along economic lines + slavery

after resolving internal cleavage -> more prominent world stage = tendency to go between isolationism and world policing

  • entered into WW1 + came out well (Woodrow Wilson key figure LoN)
  • isolationist tendency among elites (more and more after the Vietnam war)

+ gradual expansion federal state (e.g. 1913 national income tax)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

civil rights movement

A

not many civil rights after wW2 in comparison with European countries

19506-60s = civil rights movement = spurred on by silent revolution

states were protected from federal -> could discriminate as they wished (which fed gov increasingly saw as an issue)

  • 1954 Brown vs Board of Education: constitutional court declared racial segregation in public schools unconstitutional

1965 voting rights act (more polling stations etc.)

(Rosa park on “white bus” was not a spontaneous action as claimed)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

American exceptionalism

A

notion that US is unique among nations

“first new nation” : frontier mentality
+ international mission to ‘lead the free world’

absence of old European class, religious or regime conflicts

principles of Americanism:

  1. freedom (indiv liberty, anti-gov)
  2. equality of opportunity (not result “pursuit of happiness”)
  3. individualism
  4. liberalism (checks on executive power)
  5. democracy (Lincoln: “of the people, by the people and for the people”)
  6. property rights (capitalism)
  7. constitutionalism (constitution as cornerstone of democracy)

American dream as ideological identity/discrimination

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

cleavages: religion

A

not that big: no history of absolutism

puritan pilgrims: emphasis on religous freedom (fled absolutist Europe)

no national church = no anticlericalism

religion and democracy go hand in hand

until the 60s: catholics vs protestatns

since 60s: new christian right + republican alignment

strong politicization of: abortion, euthanasia, LGBT+ rights, drugs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

cleavages: class

A

not very important bc:

  • suffrage before strong industrialization
  • no unified working class
  • american dream: equality of opportunity

BUT: very high and growing inequality

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

ethnicity/race cleavage

A
  • nation of immigrants
  • legacy of segregation and racism
  • whites have more wealth, still feels marginalized (diff objective difference and subjective feelings)

!not all African Americans vote against Trump: there’s an individual difference between groups (some vote Republican bc they are afraid of authoritarianism)

on average: democrats are more progressive, gaining more votes from minority groups

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

WASP

A

= white, anglosaksen, protestant

-> presidential leaders were expected to be this

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

state structures

A

majoritarian + liberal elements

separation of powers

  • (in)directly elected president
  • directly elected bicameral legislature
  • powerful judiciary and strong constitution
  • powerful states
  • importance of veto-powers
  • direct democracy

wariness about a strong state

symmetric federalism, but not cooperative like in Germany

majoritarian element: lots of positions have to be decided by majority vote (-> voter fatigue + decreasing turnout)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

US president

A
  • (in) directly elected for 4y terms
  • eligibility: 35y old + natural born citizen
  • appoints/fires cabinet
  • nominates judges, ambassadors, public officials (Senate has to approve the nominations)
  • commander-in-chief of armed forces
  • veto powers (but can be overruled)
  • powers expanded over time

impeachment procedure (congress):
treason, bribery and other high crimes
can be initiated with simple majority in the House, Senate conducts the trial

  • impeachment: simple majority in the house of representatives + 2/3 majority in the Senate
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

presidential candidates

A

chosen with primaries: registered members can vote for the presidential candidates

-> diff electoral systems per party

problem with primaries: create divisions in the party
(still, having primaries increases democratic legitimacy, leading to more votes)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

presidential elections

A

indirect: voting for the Electoral College

all states (except Maine and Nebraska) = FPTP / winner-take-all
-> one party gets all the seats in the electoral college

focus on “swing states” (states where both parties have ~equal levels of support -> elections highly competitive)

Electoral College votes the president

  • each state has electors equaling the nr of representatives and senators (+ 3 from DC) -> 538
  • states and parties determine manner of selecting their electors
  • states determine how electors are allocated
  • winners must have majority (not plurality) of 270 votes
  • possibiity of “faithless electors”

“faitless electors”: vote is per letter, in all states but Maine and Nebraska electors are asked to vote for the person that won the majority, sometimes there are sneaky electors that vote differently than they were supposed to do

2020: Trump said elections were stolen, Georgia had sent letters for Biden, Trump sent letters for himself and asked vice president Pence to disregard the original letters -> Pence didn’t do it and saved democracy

2016: Clinton won majority, Trump won more states
2020: Biden won majority and most states

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Congress: the House of Representatives

A
  • 435 members (6 non-voting, Washington DC)
  • 2y terms
  • introduces and passes legislation (mostly: budget, taxes and revenue)
    !no deadline for decisions on the budget -> often gridlock

elections:

  • SMD and plurality -> 2-party system (Duverger’s law)
  • gerrymandering
  • cohabitation: party majority in the house can be diff from the party of the president (esp in the elections 2y into the presidency)
17
Q

Senate

A

each state has 2 members, irrespective of population size

reflects liberal democracy: protecting small states

  • 6y terms
  • 1/3 elected every 2y
  • presided over by vice president (deciding vote)
    *vice president also introduces and passes legislation
  • introduces and passes legislation
  • approves presidential appointments

!every bill has to pass both senate and house -> can also cause gridlock: composition can be diff in both chambers

18
Q

independent

A

mostly been associated with republican power since 2022

19
Q

elements of direct democracy + low turnout

A

vote for specific positions, e.g. judges, school board members, mayors

election day = first Tuesday of november
(always get a billet, if its for school leadership or president)

turnout = llowest among western democracies:

  • voter fatigue (vote so much)
  • winner-take-all system
  • registration laws
  • anti-gov mentality
  • active voter suppression and gerrymandering (most weird shapes constituencies to make sure that incumbents can keep their position)
20
Q

judiciary

A

= Supreme Court

  • powerful judiciary
  • conservative members
  • lifetime appointments
  • 9 members, three (appointed by Trump) are controversial: Gorsuch, Kavenaugh, Barret
    *Barret: controversial bc Obama couldn’t put new member in place just before elections, so why could Trump?
21
Q

Federalism

A

origins: 13 colonies

now: 50 states + federal district + 5 overseas territories

states have significant powers (health, education, welfare)

  • e.g. southern states banned some books, evolution theory etc.

competitive federalism = e.g. tax competition

  • different levels of government (federal, state, and local) compete with one another to attract residents, businesses, and investments

produces lack of standardization

(states responsible for own revenue generation, in contrast to Germany, where federal gov collects and distributes)

22
Q

political parties

A

parties/factions originally seen as something to be wary about, in the 80s the main 2 parties came up

  • constitution makes no mention of parties
  • since 1850s: democrats vs republicans
  • traditionally: no strong ideological differences
  • lacking internal coherence
  • primarily campaign organizations
  • no party membership, only ‘registration’
  • open structure of parties (see e.g. Trump and Sanders that got really big really fast without that much initial support)

no strong ideologies -> more personal influences

23
Q

political parties: republicans

A

founded 1854
elephant logo

famous presidents: Lincoln, Roosevelt, Eisenhower, Bush, Trump

‘Grand Old Party’ (but the Democrats (1828) are older)

ideology = lose
(ideology used to be: large federal gov. + urban voters)

  1. conservative
  2. christian values
  3. small federal gov.
  4. rural, white voters
  5. free trade (sometimes), foreign affairs

since 2016 (Trump): ideological transformation/radicalization

  • vote didn’t go to the more central candidate in the primaries as usual
24
Q

Political parties: democrats

A

1828
donkey logo

origins: focus on the ‘common man’

since 1960s: more left-wing, progressive

ideology:

  1. equality of opportunity
  2. interventionist: bigger federal state
  3. liberalism (political and economic)
  4. progressive values
  5. urban and minority voters
  6. social rights and environmentalism

since 2016: leftists (Sanders/Warren) vs centrists (Clinton/Biden)

25
Q

affective polarization

A

mix ideological and affective polarization

  • ideological = partisan cleavage
  • affective = emotional divisons us-them (divides that crosscut partisan lines)

unfavorable opinions towards the other group increasing since 1994

  • reasons: media echochambers
    *media are private -> fox (republican bias) diff media than CNN + they depict each other as the enemy
26
Q

effects of polarization

A
  1. extreme polarization undermines democratic stability (see French 4th republic + Weimar Germany)
  2. decline of cross-cutting identities (sorting)
    sorting = overlapping cleavages worse: Republican neighborhood, so i won’t move there
  3. radicalization of voters and parties
  4. gridlock and standstill (gov. shutdowns) = polarization prevents forming political compromises -> resentment and less faith in democracy
  5. weakening the “guardrails of democracy”: media usually check on gov, but now also polarized and not neutral + judiciary also politicized
27
Q

examples problems polarization

A

impeachments Trump: democrat House approved (had majority) but Senate voted agaisnt (Republicans had enough people there)

2022: Roe v. Wade 1973 (guaranteed abortion laws) overturned by Republican dominated Supreme Court
- mostly democrats are unfavorable of the supreme court, republicans are happy with it

2021: US capitol attack bc Trump claimed elections were stolen -> public rallied against Democrat victory

2023: 4 Trump Indictments, Supreme Court did not obstruct candidacy

28
Q

(article) affective polarization US

A

diff with ideological polarization:

  • ideological polarization = difference between policy positions of Democrats and Republicans = mass public polarized on issues, not parties itself
  • affective polarization = polarization based on in- and out-group identification between parties themselves (not about their specific stances) = animosity between parties

party identification -> in- and out-group identification
partisanship as salient/powerful identifier bc:

  1. acquired at a young age + rarely changes over the life cycle
  2. political campaigns recur frequently and last for many months in the US
    -> Americans see the political world through a partisan prism
29
Q

(article) measuring affective polarization

A
  1. survey self-reports on partisan effect
    -> “feeling thermometer”: scale candidates 0 (cold) - 100 (warm)
    -> social distance: extent to which individuals feel comfortable interacting with out-group members
  2. implicit or subconscious tests of partisan bias (= more valid)
  3. behavioral measurements of interpersonal trust and group favoritism/discrimination
30
Q

(article) causes of affective polarization

A

increase affective polarization:

  1. increase % sorted partisans
  2. high-choice media environment + proliferation partisan news outlets
    -> lack of balanced content persuades viewers to adopt extreme ideological positions
  3. mainstream media increasingly focus on polarization (-> more affective polarization, less ideological polarization)
  4. political campaigns make partisanship more salient
  5. homogeneous online and offline interpersonal networks
31
Q

(article) consequences affective polarization

A
  1. screening social partners = political homogeneous friends and marriages
    also when checked for post-marriage conversion (by looking at dating apps)
  2. price differences + difference in hiring + diff view on eco performance (in vs out-gov party)
  3. professional decisions: e.g. doctors from different parties different advise on abortion (but not on issues that are not politicized)
  4. political: evidence affective polarization fuels political activity
31
Q

(article) how to decrease affective polarization

A
  1. correct misperceptions about party supporters -> reduces animosity
    e.g. only 2.2% Republicans earn >$250.000 a year
  2. shift salience of partisan identities = emphasize common group “Americans”
  3. make partisanship and politics less salient

!!sounds easy, isn’t

31
Q

(article) how does affective polarization threaten representative democracy?

A
  1. partisanship appears to compromise the norms and standards we apply to our elected representatives
  2. leads partisans to call into question the legitimacy of election results