Unit 7 - Ch. 9 Flashcards
What is the most prevalent form of violence in society?
Intimate partner violence
Why is intimate partner violence distinct from other types of violence?
Victims and perpetrators know each other
Often an ongoing relationship prior, during, and after a violence episode
Define intimate partner violence
Violence occurring between intimate partners who are living together or separated.
However, defining intimate partner violence is controversial.
Unfortunately, no consensus exists for a definition, although most current definitions of intimate partner violence include non-violent abuse (such as emotional or financial abuse) and sexual abuse. Differential rates of abuse can be the result of differences in who is sampled and what is counted.
Define spousal violence
Spousal violence is more specific and refers to violence between same-sex couples who are legally married, common-law, separated, or divorced.
For much of history, intimate partner violence had a quasi-legitimacy. Why is that?
Because of cultural and religious attitudes that effectively placed women in subservient roles within the family.
It was not until the _____ that major changes took place in Canadian law dealing with intimate partner violence.
1980s
When examining the frequency of violence, it is important to clarify the distinction between ________ and ______.
Prevalence: refers to the total number of people who have experienced violence in a specified time period, whereas
Incidence: is the number of new cases identified or reported at a given point in time, usually one year.
When reporting on the estimates of intimate partner violence, many factors will influence the prevalence and incidence figures.
Types of abuse
Psychological/emotional
Physical
Financial/Material
Sexual
What is the form of abuse that is often described as being the most hurtful?
Psychological
Financial abuse is most often studied in the context of _____ abuse, but can also occur within ______ ______.
Elder
intimate relationship
Conflict Tactics Scale
Scale designed to assess how a person and his or her partner resolve conflict; measures constructive problem solving, verbal aggression, and physical aggression.
The CTS consists of 18 items ranging from constructive problem-solving (e.g., discussing issues calmly) to verbal aggression (e.g., swearing or threatening to hit) and physical aggression (e.g., slapping or using a knife). Respondents indicate how often they have used different methods and how often they have experienced these acts.
In the 2009 survey using a modified version of the Conflict Tactics Scale, what were the findings?
19 422 respondents 15+
2% of male and female respondents had experienced physical and/or sexual assault.
In the 5 years preceding the survey (2005-2009) 6% of male and female respondents reported having experienced physical and/or sexual assault (17% of respondents reported experiencing emotional or financial abuse).
Women experienced triple the amount of severe forms of violence (choking, sexually assaulted, threatened with gun)
Women were more likely to experience repeated victimizations (57% women vs 40% men)
Women were more likely to have been injured (42% women vs 18% men)
Younger people (25-34) three times more likely to experience IPV compared to 45+ years old.
Violence was more common for Indigenous respondents and respondents having a physical or mental health problem. Less common for immigrants.
Highest rates of violence were reported by gay/lesbian individuals (twice as high as heterosexuals) and bisexuals (four times higher than heterosexuals).
Experience of IPV did not vary across income or education level.
Violence against women was more likely to be reported to police (23%) compared to 7% for men.
The primary reason for victims to report to police was to get the violence to stop and obtain police protection. The primary reason for not reporting was because they viewed it as a personal matter.
What are the limitations of the Conflict Tactic Scale? CTS
What was the response to these concerns?
-Failure to assess for the context and purpose of violent acts (offensive vs defensive)
-Few items measuring psychological aggression.
-No assessment of sexual aggression
-No assessment of the consequences of aggression (what types of injuries occur)
Straus, Hamby, Boney-McCoy, and Sugerman (1996) developed a more comprehensive version—the CTS-2, in which the following changes were made:
-The physical aggression scale was expanded to include more acts (e.g., burned or scalded partner on purpose, slammed partner against wall).
-The verbal aggression scale was renamed psychological aggression and additional items were added (e.g., did something to spite partner).
-The reasoning scale was renamed negotiation and additional items were added (e.g., explained side of argument).
-New scales were added to measure sexual aggression (e.g., I used threats to make my partner have sex) and physical injury (e.g., I had a broken bone from a fight with my partner).
-A better description was developed of minor versus more serious forms of acts.
-Items from each scale were interspersed to minimize response sets.
In 2013, the World Health Organization reviewed research from 79 counties and concluded that…
“Violence against women is pervasive globally”.
It found global lifetime prevalence of physical and/or sexual violence in intimate relationships to be 30 percent, however prevalence rates varied widely around the world.
The highest lifetime prevalence rates were found in central sub-Saharan Africa (66 percent), South Asia (42 percent), and Andean Latin America (41 percent), and the lowest rates were found in East Asia (15 percent), Western Europe (19 percent) and North America (21 percent).
In addition, findings showed that 38 percent of all murders of women were committed by their intimate partners. These survey results provide a clear indication that IPV remains a prevalent and ongoing societal concern.
Is there increased risk of engaging in IPV among people with a psychiatric disorder?
A recent meta-analysis of 17 studies found that there was an increased risk of lifetime physical violence against a partner in men and women with a psychiatric disorder.
However, it was not clear from the studies reviewed whether the violence occurred when the person was actively experiencing psychiatric symptoms. In addition, the authors were not able to examine whether the violence perpetrated might have been due to substance use. It has been shown that much of the increased risk of general violence in mentally ill people is due to substance use.
The International Dating Violence Study (Chan et al. 2008) used the Conflict Tactics Scale–2 to examine the prevalence of dating violence in 14 252 university students across 32 countries. What were the Canadian findings?
In comparison to other countries, Canadian dating violence rates were in the lower half of the nations surveyed. However, about one in five Canadian university students reported having experienced physical assault by their dating partners in the previous 12 months.
In contrast, the United States and Canada had relatively high rates of sexual coercion as compared to other countries.
In 2013, Statistics Canada (Beaupré 2015) provided information on the number of police-reported intimate partner and dating partner violence incidents across Canada.
How many were reported?
90 720 incidents were reported in 2013 (rate remained steady over the past five years).
The survey showed that violence often does not end when a relationship ends—in 33 percent of cases the perpetrator was an ex-intimate or dating partner.
The highest incidence of victimization was in younger people between the ages of 20 to 29. The data likely underestimate the amount of violent offences, since most victims do not call the police.
In addition, police data only include forms of intimate partner violence that are chargeable under the Canadian Criminal Code (most forms of psychological and financial abuse are excluded).
According to the 2013 Statistics Canada survey on IPV, which province had the most reported incidents? The least?
Highest in Saskatchewan and Alberta (635.0 and 512.7 victims per 100 000 population, respectively)
Lowest in Ontario and PEI (231.8 and 239.0 victims per 100 000 population, respectively).
However, in Nunavut the rate is six times higher than in Saskatchewan (3995.4 per 100 000 population)
Why are rates of police-reported IPV varied across provinces?
Differing number of risk factors across the provinces and territories: social isolation, younger couples, higher levels of unemployment, higher rates of alcohol consumption, more common-law marriages, lack of resources for victims, and the proportion of Indigenous Peoples.
According to the 2013 Statistics Canada survey on IPV, which gender is most the most likely victim to report IPV to police across all provinces?
What was the rate of charges laid for incidents involving female victims and incidents involving male victims?
Women
80%
74% of incidents involving female victims
64% involving male victims
A study by Akers and Kaukinen (2009), using data from the Canadian General Social Survey from 1999, examined which demographic and incidence-related variables were related to police-reporting decisions. What was the findings?
-Married women were less likely to report violence (likely due to stronger emotional and financial ties)
-Women with children in the home who witnessed the abuse are more likely to contact the police
-Minority women were more likely to contact police than caucasian women.
-Likelihood of reporting increased with age
-Women more likely to call police if injured of a weapon was involved
-If the abuser was drinking during the incident or if he also destroyed property, the victim was more likely to report the abuse.
According to some studies, women engage in more _______ violence than men.
Minor
Williams and Frieze (2005) analyzed the occurrence of violence in 3519 couples and found that the most frequently occurring type of violence was….
…mutual and mild violence followed by mutual severe violence.
This pattern indicates that, at least for some forms of intimate violence, the long-held belief that males are the primary instigators is false
Recent evidence indicates that it is possible to identify personality and behavioural features in _________ _____ that will predict their use of _______ in _____ _____ _____ _____ ____ regardless of whether their ____ _____ uses violence.
15-year-old girls
violence
dating relationships at age 21
male partner
In a large international study of dating violence among university students in 32 countries, Straus (2008) reported that a slightly higher percentage of women engage…….
…in minor violence (e.g., slapping, throwing something at a partner that could hurt) and that equal rates of serious violence occur for men and women.
Gender biases in which men are disadvantaged exist in several other contexts. A long-standing belief associated with intimate violence is that due to differences in physical size and strength, women…
However, several studies have shown that while it is true that women are more likely to be ________ than men as consequence of intimate violence, the incidence of ____ being injured by ____ is surprisingly_____.
…are most likely to suffer serious injuries compared to men.
Injured
men
women
high
Is there gender bias in police response to intimate partner violence?
G.R. Brown findings about intimate violence charges laid by police by gender:
Brown found that in severe injury cases, _____% of ____ and ____% of ______ defendants were found guilty.
Yes.
Injured female: Men charged 91% of time
Injured male: Women charged 60% of the time
Uninjured female: Men charged 52% of the time
Uninjured male: Women charged 13% of the time
71% of men
22% of women
What major factor plays a role in the low percentage of women being found guilty in intimate violence cases?
Men being unwilling to testify.
Follingstad, Helff, Binford, Runge, and White (2004) found that the gender bias even extends to psychologists. They presented two scenarios to a large sample of clinicians (N = 449, 56 percent male, median age 52). The scenarios provided a context and description of psychologically abusive behaviours. Critically, Follingstad et al. reversed the gender of the protagonists in the scenarios. Results showed that….
…the same behaviour was rated more abusive and severe when it was carried out by a male than when carried out by a female.
Moreover, the bias was not affected by the context of the scenario (frequency, intent, perception of recipient) nor by the gender of the psychologist.
Specific items rated more abusive if performed by a man included “made to account for whereabouts at all times,” “would not allow to look at members of same sex,” “threatened to have committed to an institution,” and “made derogatory comments.”
Almost all prevention and intervention programs target….
…men who abuse their partners.
The negative consequences of intimate partner violence can be a result of….
Multiple adverse health outcomes for both victims and their children have been identified, including…
The following consequences have ben identified (WHO 2013):
-Physical trauma
-Psychological trauma and stress
-Fear and lack of control
…physical, sexual and reproductive, and mental health disorders.
-Physical trauma: Physical injuries can lead to permanent disabilities. Spousal violence resulted in 42% of women reporting physical injuries.
-Sexual health: Refusal of men who engage in violence to use contraceptives leads to higher rates of HIV, sexually transmitted diseases, and unwanted pregnancies in victims of spousal violence.
-Reproductive health: Violence during pregnancy increases the likelihood of having miscarriages, stillbirths, premature delivery, and low-birth-weight babies.
-Mental Health: Violence leads to higher rates of depression, post-traumatic stress disorder, sleep and eating disorders, problem drinking, and suicide attempts.
-Physical health: A wide range of physical health problems can result including headaches, back pains, gastrointestinal disorders, and fibromyalgia.
-Social and economic costs: women who experience violence often suffer isolation, inability to work, loss of wages, and limited ability to care for themselves and their children.
-Impact on Children: Children who grow up in families where there is violence may have emotional and behavioural problems. They are also more likely to engage in violence as adolescents and adults.
The WHO (2013) demonstrated that violence against women is…
…a major contributing factors to physical and mental health problems, causes harm to observing children, and limits victims’ participation in society.
Roberts and Roberts (2005) developed a typology that classified victims into five levels based on duration and severity of abuse using interviews with 501 battered women. What are the features of each level?
Level 1 (short-term):
-Mild to moderate intensity violence’
-One to three violent incidents
-Less than one year in the dating relationship
-Leaving the relationship shortly after the onset of violence
-Middle class with secondary or higher education
-Presence of caring support system
Level 2 (Intermediate):
-Moderate to severe intensity violence
-Three to fifteen incidents
-Cohabitating or recently married for several months to two years
-Leaves when the violence escalates
-Middle class
-Presence of caring support system
Level 3 (Intermittent long-term):
-Severe intensity violence with long periods without violence
-Four to thirty incidents
-Married with children
-Leaves when children are grown up
-Middle to upper class, reliant on husband’s resources
-No alternative support system
Level 4 (Chronic and predictable):
-Severe and frequent violence including use of weapons, forced sexual acts, and death threats; serious injuries sustained
-Several hundred acts
-Married with children
-Violence precipitated by substance abuse
-Abuse continues until husband is arrested, hospitalized, or dies
-Lower to middle class
Level 5 (Homicidal):
-Severe and frequent violence
-Hundreds of severe violent acts
-Long-term marriage or separated
-Lower class with limited education
-Abuse ends when woman kills her partner
-Suffers from depression, suicidal ideation, post-traumatic stress disorder, and battered woman’s syndrome
Roberts and Roberts’ typology provides an initial step toward understanding types of battered women. However, additional research is needed to replicate this typology. Categorizing women this way serves more than an academic purpose.
When women are asked what triggers violent incidents (male to female violence), their answers have included:
-Not obeying or arguing with the man
-Not having food ready on time
-Not caring adequately for the children or home
-Questioning the man about money or girlfriends
-Going somewhere without the man’s permission
-The man suspecting the woman of infidelity
-Refusing the man sex
In some countries, men perceive themselves as “owners” of their wives and children and feel that is it justified to use force in certain circumstances. For example:
-In Egypt, 57% of urban women and 81% of rural women agree that a man is justified in beating his wife is she refuses to have sex with him.
-In New Zealand, the majority of men believe that under no circumstances should you physically abuse a woman, although 5% agree that physical force would be justified if the man came home and found his wife in bed with another man.
A World Health Organization (2005) study asked women under which circumstances a man would be justified in beating his wife. The reasons most commonly given were:
Across all countries, the most widely accepted justification for violence was:
Women were also asked if they believed a woman has the right to refuse sex if she is ill, if her husband is drunk, if her husband is mistreating her, or if she does not want to have sex. The most acceptable reason to refuse sex was:
…and the least acceptable was:
-Not completing housework
-Refusing to have sex
-Disobeying her husband
-Being unfaithful
Female infidelity, ranging from 6% in Serbia to 80% in Ethiopia.
Illness
If she did not want to have sex
In some countries, such as Ethiopia and Tanzania, about 20 percent of women felt they did not have the right to refuse sex under any conditions.
United States, Simon et al. (2001) found that ____ percent of men did ___ ____ it was “ok to hit your wife to keep her in line” (p. 118). In addition, participants were more accepting of ____ hitting ____ as compared to _____ hitting _____.
98%
not think
Women
men
Men
Women
The ______ available to a person determine how they ________ to an _____ _____.
options
respond
abusive
event
Do most victims of intimate partner violence seek help from a variety of sources or just one?
Variety - Both legal and extralegal sources.
Researchers have found that the following factors can keep an abused woman in a relationship:
-Fear of retribution
-Lack of economic support
-Concern for the children
-Emotional dependence
-Lack of support from friends and family
-Hope that the man will change
-Fear of being socially ostracized (in developing countries)
Does abuse always end when a relationship ends?
No. Ending a relationship may subsequently initiate unwanted behaviour by the ex-partner (such as stalking) in a bid to re-start the relationship using intimidation.
A significant portion of homicides in intimate partner relationships occurs when….
…a woman makes the decision to leave her abusive mate.
Between 1997-2006 in Canada, there were ____ spousal homicides, with ___ being female and ____ being men.
____% of the female homicides occurred when the woman was separated from her partner.
766
66
150
16%
Most battered women first seek help first from…. followed by…
…friends and family followed by more formal supports such as police, DV shelters, etc.
In a study assessing the help-seeking behaviour of women who had experienced violence (92 percent had experienced intimate partner violence), Postmus, Severson, Berry, and Yoo (2009) found that the options women used were not necessarily what they considered the most helpful. The top five resources used were:
Which ones were in the top five for helpfulness?
What is the top five in terms of helpfulness?
- Emotional support from friends and family (helpfulness = 12)
- Professional counseling (helpfulness = 13)
- Medication for emotional problems (helpfulness = 15)
- Welfare (helpfulness = 4)
- Support groups or self-help (helpfulness = 16).
Welfare
- Subsidized day care
- Religious or spiritual counseling
- Subsidized housing
- Welfare
- Educational support