Unit 3.5 Flashcards

1
Q

What is a counterexample?

A

A counterexample is a syllogism of the same form as the original but with obviously true premises and an obviously false conclusion in order to show the original invalid.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

The validity of syllogisms depends on what?

A

It depends solely on their form. Certain forms are always valid; other forms are always invalid.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is a distributed term?

A

A distributed term is a term that, within a statement, refers to all members of its category.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Which term is distributed in All S is P?

A

S

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Which term is distributed in No S is P?

A

S and P

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Which term is distributed in Some S is P?

A

Neither

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Which term is distributed in Some S is not P?

A

P

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Does the square of opposition relate to the distribution of statements?

A

Yes. The contradicting statements have an opposite distribution of terms.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is Rule 1 of testing syllogisms by rules?

A

In at least one premise, the middle term must be distributed. Not doing this is called the Fallacy of the Undistributed Middle.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is Rule 2 of testing syllogisms by rules?

A

If a term is distributed in the conclusion, it must also be distributed in its premise. Not doing this is called either Illicit Major or Illicit Minor.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is Rule 3 of testing syllogisms by rules?

A

A valid syllogism cannot have two negative premises. Not doing this is called Fallacy of Two Negative Premises.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is Rule 4 of testing syllogisms by rules?

A

A valid syllogism cannot have two affirmative premises and a negative conclusion. Basically, the conclusion type has to match at least one premise. Not doing this is called Fallacy of Two Affirmative Premises and a Negative Conclusion.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly