Unit 1 Flashcards
Type of work conducted in early behavior analysis
Topography-based bxmodification/management
Populations served in early behavior analysis
Prisoners; severe autism, mental retardation, schizophrenia
Conducted the early applications of behavior analysis
Behavioral experimental psychology graduates
Used by ABA pioneers to evaluate effectiveness in the real world
Early applications of EAB
Year ABA was formalized
1968
Caused the drift to behavior modification and management
Institutional need for “behavior modifiers”
Approach used by behavior modifiers
“Topography-based” behavior reduction
Focuses only on problem bx
Behavior management
Cook-book approach
Topography-based
Technologist
Procedures at the core 4
4 characteristics of behavior modification/management
Individualized
Function-based
Analysts
Basic principles at the core
4 characteristics of behavior analysis
Minimizes achieving meaningful outcomes
Minimizes access to reinforcers
Maximizes contact with punishers
May result in restricted access to community
4 characteristics of problem behavior
Rate (too high) IRT (too short) Duration (too long) Severity/intensity (too high) Wrong place, situation, or time
5 parameters of problem behavior
Model for treating problem bx based on form of the bx
Topography-based treatment model
Use of punishers and restrictive procedures
Use of artificial and arbitrary reinforcers
Heavy use of DROsLack of planning for generalization and maintenance
Characteristics of topography-based treatment procedures
“One-size fits all” approach
Cook-book approach
Taught non-functional incompatible behaviors
Topography-based DRI
Alternative bx benefited caregivers and not client
Topography-based DRA
Contingent relations not broken Bx did not maintain or generalizeProblem bx hidden under tight stimulus control
3 limitations of the topography-based treatment model
Model for treating problem bx based on the function
Function-based treatment model
An appropriate form of communication is taught to replace problem bx
Functional Communication Training (FCT)
FCT –Stage 1
Conduct a functional assessment or analysis
FCT –Stage 2
Train and differentially reinforce a communicative response
FCT –Stage 3
Transfer control to real-life settings and persons
More specific words taught and results in a larger speaker repertoire
Mand training
Incorporate multiple trainers & settingsInclude like stimuliSequential modification
3 strategies for promoting generalization in FCT
Is our subject matter bx alone?
No; includes operants, respondents, contingencies, functional relations
Are the “functions of bx” only“attention, tangibles, escape, and automatic reinforcement”?
No; typical statements about “function” are oversimplifications
Should antecedents have only a first name?
No; antecedents only exist in relation to consequences (last name)
Can we neglect context?
No; behavior changes in relation to context
Are we effective if we only change behavior?
No; change real-world contingencies to achieve meaningful outcomes
Manipulation of a stimulus produces a reliable &predictable change in a response
Functional relation
Probabilistic
Nonlinear
Complex
Allows for predictions
4 characteristics of functional relations
Not cause-and-effect or deterministic
Functional relations are probabilistic
Compared to nonlinear equations in calculus
Functional relations are nonlinear
Functional relations change with respect to context
Functional relations are complex
What an organism“does”and “why”
Everyday usage of the term function
A mathematical relation between stimulus classes and response classes
Scientific usage of the term function
Problem with using the “everyday definition of function”
Practitioners use teleological explanations
One event depends on another
Contingency
Derive effects on bx from a past history of differential availability with a consequence
Discriminative stimuli
Derive effects on bx from their value-altering effect on consequences
Motivating operations
Consequence leads to the development of that discriminative stimulus
Last name of discriminative stimuli
The consequence whose value is being altered
Last name of motivating operations