UAM Flashcards

1
Q

Define UAM

A

Where D commits a criminal act which results in death but does not have the MR for the unlawful killing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What s the maximum sentence?

A

life imprisonment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

list the 4 steps to go in order

A
  1. commit unlawful act
  2. act must be dangerous
  3. act must cause death
  4. have MR for unlawful act
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

D must commit an unlawful act. A civil wrong is not enough as shown in (case?)

A

R v Franklin

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What did R v Lamb show about liability?

A

Where there is a killing but not an unlawful act, the D cannot be liable for the death

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What did R v Lowe show?

A

The unlawful activity must be an act, an omission alone is not enough

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What test is used to determine dangerousness

A

objective test

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

R v Church held that it must be ‘such as..’

A

’.. all sober and reasonable people would recognise that it must subject the other person to, at least some harm, albeit not serious harm.’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

the risk of some harm + act needs to be aimed at the victim. T?F?

A

FALSE.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Name the 2 cases that show it does not matter that D doesn’t realise the risk of some harm and the act need not be aimed at the V

A

R v Larkin & R v Mitchell

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What does R v J M and S show

A

its not necessary for the sober and reasonable person to foresee the particular type of harm the V suffers

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

what did R v Larkin & R v Mitchell show

A

it does not matter that D doesn’t realise the risk of some harm and the act need not be aimed at the V

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What standards is the D judged by?

A

What the reasonable man would know at the time

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What does R v Dawson show

A

What the reasonable man would know at the time

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What does R v Watson show

A

the reasonable man would only know what the D knew e.g threatening an old man even if u don’t know they have a condition u could assume due to age

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

The unlawful act need not be aimed at a person, it can be aimed at ______

A

property

17
Q

what does R v Goodfellow show

A

unlawful act need not be aimed at a person, it can be aimed at property, provided its such that all sober and reasonable people would recognise the risk of some harm to another

18
Q

3 steps to applying the unlawful act? (step 1)

A
  1. What was the unlawful act offence? E.g assault, battery, theft, ABH/GBH
  2. The definition of the offence is apprehension/immediate unlawful personal violence
  3. When did they commit this? Say what they did in scenario
19
Q

what type of offences would be defined as immediate unlawful personal violence

A

GBH, ABH, battery

20
Q
A
21
Q
A