Diminished Responsibility Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

the special defence of DR is under..?

A

s.52 Coroners & Justice Act 2009

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Where did Coroners & Justice Act amend?

A

s.2 Homicide Act 1957

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What’s stated under s.52(1)

A

D must suffer from an ‘abnormality of mental functioning’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is an abnormality of mental functioning?

A

a condition that is a state of mind that’s so different from that of an ordinary man that the reasonable man would regard as abnormal

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Name 2 cases for s.52

A

R v Bryne 1960

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What does AOMF actually mean when looking at scenarios?

A

The symptoms D has due to their condition (the acts)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What’s stated under s52(1)(a)

A

the AOMF must have ‘arose from a recognised medical condition’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What types of conditions does s52(1)(a) cover?

A

physical & psychological

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Name the case for mental deficiency

A

R v Speake 1957

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Main facts (Speake 2957)

A

D’s murder conviction reduced to manslaughter as he had a mental deficiency, diminishing his responsibility for killing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Name the case for premenstrual tension

A

R v Smith 1982

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Main facts (Smith 1982)

A

PMT could not provide a defence of automatism, but could be recognised as a medical for DR

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Name the case for epilepsy

A

R v Campbell 1997

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Main Facts (Campbell 1997)

A
  • D had frontal lobe damage & epilepsy
  • wasn’t able to plead DR - medical opinion: his AOMF had not substantially impaired his mental responsibility due to his ability to recall events lucidly
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Name the case for paranoia

A

R v Martin 2002

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Main facts (Martin 2002)

A

D killed burglar fleeing from his home, claiming self-defense > was able to plead DR due to his paranoid personality disorder

17
Q

Name the case for depression

A

R v Seers

18
Q

Name the case for chronic depression

A

R v Gittens 1984

19
Q

Name the case for battered woman syndrome

A

R v Ahluwalia

20
Q

Name the case for sexual psychopath

A

R v Byrne

21
Q

Name the case for ADS

A

R v Conroy

22
Q

Main facts (Seers 1985)

A

D killed wife - claimed DR on grounds of reactive depression > conviction reduced to manslaughter due to his mental condition.

23
Q

Main facts (Gittens 1984)

A

D suffering chronic depression, killed wife
& stepdaughter after consuming alcohol and drugs for medication.
- CoA > the jury should be directed “to disregard what, in their view, the effect of the alcohol or drugs upon the D was”