Twilight Zone of Dreams

Question 1

Prodromal Dreams.defn?.may to do w/?.may rise more easily?e.g.?

Answer 1

.dream corresponds to or manifests physical illness in the body.may have to do with thin boundaries.something in our body may rise more easily into consciousness than for others.classmate dream of intense abdominal pain, 3 mo later had ovarian cancer

Question 2

Paranormal Dreams.defn?.can rep p, t, c.e.g.?

Answer 2

.correctly represent unlikely future event (precognition), another’s mental state (telepathic), location or physical properties of some distant object (clairvoyance).e.g. Aberfan discovered kid had dream black mud covering village, before a giant mudslide

Question 3

Lucid Dreams.still considered, even tho?.NOT?.red lights?.ends?.triggers?.accompanied by an.cognition not as

Answer 3

.still considered twilight zone even tho evidence for them.NOT all or nothing (some control dreams but not lucide, and vice versa).red lights shone in participant eyes can trigger lucid dreams.excitemend ends lucid dreams, stay chill.bizarre pre-lucid dreaming triggers it.accompanied by intense sense of realism.cognition not as good as in waking

Question 4

2 research challenges for Twilight Zone dreams1. information tends to be?.can’t be? exa? selectively r?2. Research is very?.BUT, that doesn’t mean. critical but?

Answer 4

1. Information tend to be anecdotal.can’t be verified, exaggerated in retelling, positive occurrences selectively remembered2. Research is very difficult to control.BUT that doesn’t mean does not exist, we tend to dismiss in our positivist age.be critical but don’t close your mind either!

Question 5

Ullmann & Krippner.when where.receiver? locked, sleep? wakened?.sender? locked, when, told?.target, was? sender what do it when?.monitor, watched? wakened sender/receiver?.one target, from? in?.in morning? had to? rank?.results? 9 of? had? supporting?.strict?.Foulkes?

Answer 5

.1980s/90s, Maimonides Hospital in NYC.receiver locked in room, sleep monitored, wakened from REM to report dream experience.sender in another room, when receiver went into REM, told to “send”.target, was a work of art (sculpture/painting) sender had to “Send” by focusing on it however he wanted (talking, dancing, visualizing) when receiver in REM.monitor watched receiver EEG, wakened sender when receiver in REM, wakened receiver after in REM for while.one target randomly selected from 100s in sealed envelopes, given to sender.in morning, receiver had to pick correct from 8, rank them based on confidence.9 of 13 studies had statistically significant positive results, suggesting ESP or some kind of phenomenon.STRICT controls for cheating.Foulkes tried to replicate, but conditions were harsh and made it impossible to replicate, otherwise his career!