Training Flashcards
• To examine the effects of career self-management training on career self-management involvement• Career self-management involves developmental feedback seeking and job mobility preparedness (prepares for internal or external career opportunities)• Results:o Career self-management training affected feedback seeking and job mobility, but in the negative directiono Older employees more likely to seek feedback and to develop job mobility• Why the unexpected findings?o Backlash from employees for having to attend a mandatory training o Unmet expectations regarding org env for trying new strategies
Kossek et al. (1998)
• Factors associated with motivation to engage in training and career development• Individual differences – cognitive ability (fluid intelligence +ly with training, crystallized intelligence +ly with career dev), objective and subjective constraints, self efficacy, big 5, human capital factors (working class employees, minorities with higher education, geographic mobilitiy, parents’ education level)• Job content/context – motivating potential of job, job empowerment, challenge & hindrance stress, org level of ees• Context of T&D – on site training, supervisor support, task assistance, length of training, composition of trainer and participants• Org and env context – financial performance, promote from within/outside hiring, tech intensity of workplace, feedback culture
Feldman & Ng (2008)
• Meta-analysis on moderators influencing the effectiveness of error-management training (EMT)• EMT will result in better post-training performance compared to traditional proceduralized and exploratory training, but not better within-training performance• EMT will result in better adaptive transfer tasks, and not so much for analog transfer task• Active exploration and error encouragement are critical components of EMT’s effectiveness
Keith & Frese (2008)
• To examine the cognitive, motivational, and emotional processes involved in active learning approaches o And how core training design elements and individual diff infl learning and transfer• Active learning – trainees control their own learning• Results:o Exploratory learning – higher analog and adaptive transfer (vs. proceduralized learning)o Error framing – higher adaptive transfer (vs. error avoidant approach)o Emotion control strategy – lower anxiety levelso Self-evaluation and metacognitive act expl effects of exploratory learningo Error framing increased intrinsic moti and SE – interacted with trait mastery orientation to infl state mastery orientationo Emotion control strategy reduced state anxiety
Bell & Koslowski (2008)
• To identify conditions necessary for Multisource Feedback (MSF) to be effective• Conditions necessary: 1) feedback must be relevant• 2) clear 3) credible 4) person must be ready to change• GAPS – acronym for info needed to identify meaningful developmental goalso Goals and values – what matters to the persono Abilities – how the person sees him/herselfo Perceptions – how others see the persono Success factors – what’s important to others• Other conditions: broaden network of others who can help, change before it’s nec, target weaknesses only if critical for job perf, focus on high voltage potential exp (novel, challenging, high stakes, interaction), take intelligent risks with reasonable chance for success, seek ongoing feedback (ask short, focused questions to many, and get help from colleagues to monitor progress)
Peterson et al (2001)
• Overview of content and format of multisource feedback (MSF) reports• Introductory information – purpose of MSF, definitions, how to read report• High level summary of data – explain how data was aggregated, highest & lowest item/competencies• Detailed presentation of MSF data – at the item and competency level• Gaps analysis – compare part ratings to a benchmark at the competency level• Presentation of verbatim comments – both strengths and weaknesses• Developmental suggestions – beh on the job, classes, training courses, readings
Dalessio & Vasilopoulos (2001)
• Examine influence of team cross-training on dev of shared team mental model (TMM), team coordination and perf• Cross-training – instructional strategy where members are trained in duties of other memberso Positional clarification – verbal infoo Positional modeling – verbal info and obso Positional rotation – active participation in tasks• Cross-training will increase ability of members to predict coordination and backup needs of team members via better TMM• Results:o Cross-training (positional modeling and rotation) improved TMMo Cross-training -> TMM -> team coordination/backup -> team performance• Implication: not nec to undergo intensive positional rotation to achieve similar effects
Marks et al (2001)
• Examine influence of trainee characteristics, team leader support, and team climate in transfer of training• Maximal vs. typical perf – explicit vs. discretionary elicitation of trained beh – typical assessment condition might be more accurate judgment of actual perf in work setting• Team leader support – informal reinforcement of trained beh• Results:o Typical assessment conditions elcited more trained beg in actual work settingo Trainees with supportive beh demonstrated more trained beh o Supportive leader -> perceptions of team climate -> posttraining beho Ind with external locus of control were more affected by team climate in demonstrating trained beh
Smith-Jentsch et al. (2001)
• Present a multilevel model of training implementation and training transfer that incorporates 3 elements from org theory: levels of analysis, content, and congruence among content and levels• 3 levels: org, team/unit, and individual• content: technostructural (more tangible and concrete aspects of the org/team) and enabling structure (interpersonal and relational components)• congruence – top-down contextual constraints on training skills and beho upward congruence effects that looks at aggregation of ind trained skills on higher level processes• Expands traditional models of training transfer to include vertical linkages across levels
Kozlowski & Salas (1997)
• Learning concept – a process aimed at producing relatively permanent cognitive/motivational/beh change• Reasons for learning – job changes, changes in psych contract, demo changes in workplace – render learning nec• Formal learning act – structured initiative by org e.g. lectures, cross training, active learning etc. – imp challenge – transfer of training• Informal learning act – ind adaptation and org socialization• Formal dev act – ee assessments, mentoring, job exp• Informal dev act – ind initiated need to learn• Approaches to learning – learning strategies, deliberate practice, learning through exp, situated learning • Ind characteristics influences on learning – goal orientation, motivation to learn, cog ability, age• Sit influences on learning – org arrangement, social factors, technology• Disc – imp to implement interventions to enhance learning
Sonnentag et al (2004)
• Outlined a multidimensional model of learning outcomes • Cognitive learning outcomes: verbal knowledge, knowledge organization (TMM), cognitive strategies (metacognitive activity)• Skill-based learning outcomes: skill compilation – less error, more task focused and skill automaticity – perform task outside consciousness, can work on parallel tasks• Affectively-based learning outcomes: attitudes – includes socializationo Motivational outcomes – mastery/perf orientation, self-efficacy, goal setting
Kraiger et al (2003)
• There are 3 levels of training needs assessment: org analysis, operations (task analysis), and person analysis (which employee needs training)• Level-of-Analysis Perspective (LAP): Events must be viewed in a larger context; analysis of individual elements is useless• Training needs assessment from LAP: The conceptualization is described for the org, subunit and ind level. Goals from each operational level (organization, subunit, individual) must be analyzed. • Task analysis: technical environment and situational constraints relevant; Person analysis: two major constructs (skill and climate)• Too little research about training needs assessment at organization/macro level of analysisSteps for conducting a needs assessment:• 1) Identify levels of analysis relevant to the current needs assessment, 2) Identify conceptual variables of interest for the appropriate levels of analysis, 3) Develop causal pathways or models that link variables within/across levels of analysis, 4)Measure variables and interpret results at the appropriate level of analysis, 5)Use levels perspective to guide training design and evaluation
Ostroff & Ford (1989)
• Meta-analysis was used to examine the relationship between specified training design and evaluation features and the effectiveness of training in organizations. • The results suggest a medium to large effect size for organizational training (effect sizes ranged from .60-.63 depending on criterion type – these are large effect sizes)• The training method used, the skill or task characteristic trained, and the choice of evaluation criteria were related to the effectiveness of training programs.• Type of evaluation criteria: Reaction criteria (affective and attitudinal responses); learning criteria; behavioral criteria (actual on the job performance); results criteria (productivity or company profits)• A systematic needs assessment can guide and serve as the basis for the design, development, delivery, and evaluation of the training program
Arthur et al (2003)
• Trainee reactions can be conceptualized as hierarchical, with overall sat explaining associations among distinct reaction facets (enjoyment, relevance, technology satisfaction). • Trainee reactions were predicted by trainee characteristics (mastery orientation, interest) and technology. Reactions related (+) to learning process (engagement) and outcomes (intentions regarding delivery technology, content, learning).• Content interest was positively related to trainee reactions• Learners who are higher in mastery orientation had more positive reactions than learners lower in this dimension• Learners who report more positive reactions were a) more engaged in training, and b) reported more positive training-related intentions at the end of training
Brown (2005)
• Refined model of training effectiveness• Learning during training is influenced by factors both prior to and during the training itself• Pretraining influences = org, social, team, or ind level influenceso Org-level: org support, mandatory/voluntary, org goalso Social-level: supervisor support during and after training, supervisor positive reaction to training, peer-level comments (usually neg)o Ind-level: trainee readiness, motivation to learn• Readiness for training: state of preparedness – sufficient cog ability, sufficient understanding of job, free from anxieties about learning environment• Motivation to learn: believe training is relevant, willingness to exert effort, past successful experiences w training or high self efficacy, pos influences from other levels• Training motivation influenced by both individual(achievement motivation, internal locus of control, conscientiousness) and situational characteristics (org climate transfer, manager and peer support)• Meta-analysis summarizes the literature on training motivation, its antecedents, and its relationships with training outcomes • Because self-efficacy and valence (+) motivation - trainers should leverage both these constructs at the beginning of training. • Cognitive ability (+) training outcomes, but g-centric approach insufficient for training success• Motivation to learn (+) internal LOC, achievement motivation, job involvement, org commitment, career planning & exploration, supervisor and peer support, and positive climate• Compelling support was for the partially mediated model: personality, age, and climate (distal variables) explained incremental variance in motivation to learn, declarative knowledge, skill acquisition, posttraing self efficacy, reaction, transfer and posttraining job performance
Colquitt et al (2000)