Performance Appraisal & Feedback Flashcards
• Distinction bw job analysis and competency modelingo Breadth of analysis: job analysis provides more complete picture of jobo Type of Characteristics studied: competency modeling focuses on any attribute related to perf, job analysis can be work or worker orientedo Unit of Analysis: competency modeling can focus on the job or the orgo General Use of Data: competency modeling is more prescriptive or future-oriented, job analysis is descriptiveo Methodological Rigor: job analysis usually involves multiple methods and competency modeling is identified by talking to management – no reason why they should differ
Schippmann et al. (2000)
Scientist-Practitioner Model - practice that has no scientific basis and research that has no clear implication for practice
Murphy & Saal (1990)
book summarizing O*NET research
Peterson et al. (1999)
• Examines the influence of demo charac of managers’ referent group on mgr’s pay level• Women tend to make less money, occupy lower status occupations, and as % of women increase in org, pay levels of org decreaseso Supply-side perspective – women devote less hrso Associate men with more status and authorityo Mismatch between stereotype of women and job• Pay generally increases with age• Results:o Men and whites had greater compensationo Age → +ly with compensationo Overall, - rel between female composition and compensationo Overall, curvilinear but positive rel btw age and compensation• Demo charac of workgroup important to consider
Ostroff & Atwater (2003)
• MA of antecedents and consq of pay satisfaction• Equity theory – perceived amount of pay deserved and perceived amount of pay received will be primary determinants of pay sat• Moderator – type of pay sat measure (global or level)• Results:o Ees perception of perf reward contingency → pay sato Pay comparisons → pay sato Distributive justice stronger correlate than procedural justice → pay sato Turnover intentions related to pay sato Type of pay sat measure moderated rel btw justice and pay sat
Williams et al. (2006)
competency modeling = the practice of identifying the characteristics or attributes that are needed for effective perf on the job
DuBois (1999)
goal of strategic job analysis = to determine the tasks that will be performed and the abilities required for effective performance in jobs (that may or may not exist) as they are expected to exist in the future
Schneider & Konz (1989)
• 16 potential social and cognitive sources of inaccuracy in job analysis• suggested that researchers have largely ignored issues of accuracy• 4 categories of inaccuracies:• Social Influence Processeso Apply when job analysis judgments are made in groups• Self-Presentation Processeso Impression management, social desirability, etc.• Information-Processing Systems of Respondentso Information overload• Bias in Information-Processing Systemso Job satisfaction, etc.
Morgeson & Campion (1997)
• Old Psychological Contract:• Stability, predictability• Permanence• Standard work patterns• Valuing loyalty• Paternalism• Job security• Linear career growth• One-time learning• New Psychological Contract• Change, uncertainty• Temporariness• Flexible work• Valuing perf and skills• Self-reliance• Employment security• Multiple careers• Life-long learning
Rousseau (1996)
• Examined formal mentoring programs from both protégé and mentor’s perspective and reported formal mentoring program characteristics and mentoring relationship outcomes• Reported formal mentoring program characteristics and mentoring relationship outcomes from both mentor and protégé perspective• Protégé as voluntary participant: makes little difference • Input into matching process critical for both• Orgs shouldn’t be concerned with matching from different locations/departments• Protégé more likely to role model individuals closer to their own rank while mentor reported the opposite- more to offer to lower ranked• Training quality and # of hours (less better) of training important
Allen et al (2006)
• To summarize mentoring research and methodological concerns• More longitudinal studies and lab research needed • Less self-report data• Formal vs. informal: consider dyadic relationships• Use content and construct measures• Manipulate race and gender, conduct global research• Use Kram’s (1985) stages: mentoring-initiation, cultivation, separation, and redefinition
Allen et al (2007)
• Study examined Five Factor model (FFM; Big 5) in relation to job performance criteria for 5 occupational groups• Conscientious is a consistently valid predictor across occupational and performance criteria types• Results suggest that agreeableness, openness, and emotional stability is not an important predictor for job performance, even in jobs with a large social component• Being courteous, trusting, straight forward and soft hearted has a smaller impact on job performance than being talkative, active, and assertive.• All of the big 5 positively predict training proficiency
Barrick & Mount (1991)
• Self- monitoring (SM) attenuates the relationship between Extraversion (ET.), Emotional Stability (ES), and Openness to Experience (OE) and interpersonal performance rating of supervisors (This was the case for peers for only ET and ES)• High SM continually scan the social climate and adapt their behavior to be appropriate; are motivated to engage in behavior that help gain social status• Low ET people had relatively strong interpersonal performance when SM is high• ET and SM – individual must be high in one of the two in order to be successful in settings where status is important• ET and AG are highly correlated with interpersonal performance• SM may not be good for all jobs – certain jobs simply require straightforward interactions• SM plays an instrumental role in predicting work-related outcomes in jobs with a large interpersonal component
Barrick et al (2005)
• Only conscientiousness and emotional stability show nonzero correlations with overall performance criterion• Authors call for a moratorium on this research• Future Researcho Research is needed to explore levels of analysis o Research is needed that investigates process models of personality that seek to explain how personality affects job performance- motivation?o Research is needed that continues to examine critical issues pertaining to the measurement of personality measures in construct valid wayso Get measures of Big Five supplied by external observers (supervisor, co-worker, customer, etc.)
Barrick et al. (2001)Moratorium on Personality - JP
• Org socialization: newcomers make transition from outsider to insider (meta-analysis)• Newcomer adjustment: role clarity, self-efficacy, social acceptance• Socialization outcomes: job sat, org commitment, job perf, intentions to remain/turnover• Org socialization tactics → adjustment → socialization outcomes• Information seeking → newcomer adjustment → socialization outcomes
Bauer et al (2007)
• Org socialization is a process where one acquires attitudes, behavior, and knowledge needed to participate as an org member• Trends: • 1. Socialization in the context of diversity: cultural differences will affect socialization tactics, behavior by employees to newcomers, and outcomes defining success• 2. Socialization in context of temporary employment relationships: contingent employment relationships = more informal for temporary workers, individual socialization and different socialization outcomes (i.e. commitment less important for temporary• 3. Socialization in context of downsizing: orgs less invested in socialization, newcomers seek less information• Socialization outcomes measure should go beyond attitudes: involve existing org members= study quitters
Bauer et al (1998)
• Realistic Job Preview (RJP): job specific and job-content laden and serves to reduce expectations of org newcomers• Expectation Lowering Procedure (ELP): not job specific and relatively content free• Perceptions of orientation helpfulness: RJP > ELP > control (normal orientation of the org studies)• Pre-beginning interventions → expectations → turnover• ELP and RJP yield similar positive org outcomes• Increase job sat, decrease turnover• ELP & RJP best combo
Buckley et al (1998)