Trade in Energy, OPEC and the IPE of Climate Change Flashcards
The energy trilemma
Unlike the monetary policy trilemma, this is not a strict trilemma, it’s hard but not impossible to obtain all three
- Stable energy supply
- No energy poverty
- Climate change mitigation
Why is stable energy supply important?
- Energy is a good that is more fundamental to our economies and lives than almost any other, we need it to:
– Power production
– Fuel most forms of transportation
– Heat our homes
– Supply electricity to our homes - Abundance of reliable, cheap energy fuels economic development
- Lack of reliable, cheap energy can cause deep economic crises
Institutions governing energy policy
- No one institution or agreement governing energy policy
- Main institution oil exporters: Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC)
- Main institution oil importers: International Energy Agency (IEA)
- A lot of other related to energy
– UNFCCC (United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change)
– IRENA (International Renewable Energy Agency)
– IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency)
– World Bank
OPEC history
- First half of 20th century: Oil production dominated by “Seven Sisters”
– Now: Exxon, Shell, BP, Chevron - 1960: 5 countries (Saudi Arabia, Iran, Iraq, Kuwait, Venezuela) form OPEC to “stabilize prices” and “ensure a fair return on capital for investors”
– = trade union to negotiate with oil companies - 1970s: OPEC asserts power, oil embargo
- From 1980s: Mandatory production quotas for members to keep supply steady and prices high
– = OPEC becomes a “cartel” - 2016: OPEC+ (coordination with Russia and others)
OEPC oil embargo 1973
- By 1973: OPEC’s production of oil at over 50% world share
- 1973: Yom Kippur War
- Arab members of OPEC impose an oil embargo on US and Netherlands and cut production
- Result: Price of imported oil to US quadruples, double-digit inflation
Oil cartel and oil prices
- OPEC negotiates to curb production through quotas, keep prices high for everyone
– eg. oil prices drop after 2008 financial crash - OPEC countries jointly reduce output - But: Coordinated output curs hard to maintain - prisoner’s dilemma
- Some argue that Saudi Arabia - OPEC’s biggest producer - tries to uphold discipline through tit-for-tat
OPEC today
- 13 member countries
- Still accounts for more than half of world’s crude oil
- Shale boom (fracking) in US and Canada has undermined OPEC’s influence in North America
The IEA (an organization for oil consumers)
- Created in 1974 under OECD framework (= only developed country members)
- Goal: Reliable energy supply, avoid future oil shocks
- Measures:
– Emergency stocks and collective oil emergency response
– Promote energy efficiency and diversification
– Research into energy markets and consulting
– Promote Clean Energy Transition
International climate negotiations
- 1992: Countries agree on UNFCCC
– Conference of the parties (COP) held every 2 years
– COP 28 held in UAE right now - 1997: Kyoto Protocol
– Set limits for developed countries to make cuts
– US never ratifies, Canada pulls out
– Emerging economies (China, India) grow rapidly but have no obligations under Kyoto
The Paris Agreement
- More politically palatable (than Kyoto Protocol)
– Everyone has to do “something”
– Countries themselves decide how much: Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs)
– Designed to allow US president to circumvent Congress
– (Some) Climate finance - Core issues today
– Stock-take: How have countries done so far?
– Phasing out of fossil fuels
– “Loss and damage” fund
Domestic interests in climate action
Climate action requires that we restrict GHG-intensive activities through higher prices, bans, quota, in the long run, we all win from policies to mitigate climate change but in the short-medium run:
- Winners among producers
– Producers of green energy
– Producers of green transportation
- Losers among producers
– Fossil fuel producers
– Energy-intensive producers
– Producers that use energy-intensive inputs
– Petrol car producers
– Airlines
– Cattle farmers
Domestic collective action problems of climate action
- The costs of effective climate action are acute and concentrated = easy for industry to organize and lobby
- The benefits of effective climate action are diffuse, they benefit everyone in the world = most (young) citizens benefit, but easy to free-ride off others’ climate protests
Two outcomes that can arise from collective action problems of climate action
- Climate action is stopped / watered down due to forceful lobbying
- The costs of climate action are born by consumers not businesses
– eg. The German Energy Transition largely paid for by energy taxes on households, not businesses
Energy poverty
- When the price of GHG-intensive products rises, not all households can
– Pay to insulate their homes
– Pay for an electric car
– Install solar panels and heat pumps - Problem: The poorest households spend the biggest share on energy
3 common policy approaches to climate action
- Carbon taxes
- Emission trading
- Green industrial policy