Torts - General Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

How does the law regard plaintiffs’ super-sensitivities?

A

Plaintiff’s super-sensitivities are not taken into account unless facts show ∆ knew of them in advance.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is the test for intent of intentional torts?

A

A person “intends” the consequences of her action if:

(1) it was her purpose to bring about the consequence, or
(2) if she knows to a degree of substantial certainty that the consequences will occur

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What are the elements of battery?

A

(1) Intent
(2) harmful/offensive contact
(3) with plaintiff’s person

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What counts as “offensive” touching, as an element of battery?

A

offensive = unpermitted

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What counts as the “plaintiff’s person” for purposes of battery elements?

A

Liberally construe; anything connection with the plaintiff will suffice.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What are the elements of assault?

A

(1) Intent
(2) reasonable apprehension of
(3) immediate unpermitted contact

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is usually necessary to fulfill the “immediacy” element of assault?

A

(1) Typically, words + conduct

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What are the elements of false imprisonment?

A

(1) Intent
(2) sufficient act of restraint
(3) to a bounded area
(4) π generally must be aware of confinement at the time it is taking place

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What counts as a “sufficient act of restraint” for purposes of a false imprisonment claim?

A

(1) threats can be enough

(2) inaction is enough if there was an understanding that ∆ would act for the π’s benefit

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What counts as a “bounded area” for purposes of a false imprisonment claim?

A

No reasonable means of escape of which the plaintiff is aware. (reasonable, is key)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

If no other torts seem to fit, what should you fall back on?

A

IIED

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What are the elements of IIED?

A

(1) Intent
(2) outrageous conduct
(3) Damages (severe emotional distress)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What are some of the factors that can make regular conduct more “outrageous”?

A

(1) Continuous conduct
(2) Type of π (child, elderly, pregnant)
(3) Type of ∆ (common carrier, innkeeper- but plaintiff must be passenger/guest)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What are the elements of trespass to land?

A

(1) Intent (no need to know you’re crossing border)
(2) act of physican invasion
(3) land

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

For the tort of trespass to land, what about the airspace above the land?

A

If the landowner can make reasonable use of the space, then invasion of that space = trespass to land

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What are the elements of trespass to chattels?

A

(1) Intent
(2) act of invasion
(3) to personal property
(4) w/ some damage

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

What are the elements of conversion?

A

(1) Intent
(2) act of invasion
(3) to personal property
(4) w/ serious interference of possessory rights

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

What are the defenses to intentional torts?

A

(1) Consent
(2) self-defense
(3) Defense of others
(4) defense of property
(5) necessity
(6) reasonable discipline

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

What types of plaintiff’s lack capacity to consent?

A

(1) children
(2) mentally impairs
(3) πs that were coerced/forced
(4) consent given under fraud

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

How do courts analyze a defense of implied consent?

A

(1) Reasonable person standard
(2) look at custom and usage, or
(3) look at π’s own conduct

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

What is the test for a valid self-defense defense?

A

Reasonable belief that there is an imminent threat of force against the ∆ (both objective and subjective)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

When is the use of deadly force still a valid use of self-defense?

A

Only if the ∆ reasonably believed she was facing the threat of deadly force herself.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

When is defense of others a valid defense?

A

A person may defend another person in the same manner and under the same conditions as the person attacked would be entitled to defend himself.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

How do mistaken beliefs apply to the defense of defense of others?

A

A ∆ will not be liable if he reasonably believed that another person was endangered (think plainclothes police officer situations)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

When is defense of property a valid defense?

A

A person may use reasonable force to defend his real or personal property, but never deadly force.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

When is force allowed to recapture property?

A

∆ may only use reasonable force to recapture property if in “hot pursuit”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

What typically goes along w/ “shoplifter” fact patterns?

A

False imprisonment claim vs. Defense of Property;

∆ can detain shoplifting using reasonable force for reasonable time

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

For what types of torts is necessity a potential defense?

A

Intentional torts to property.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
29
Q

What is the defense of necessity, and what does it protect the ∆ from?

A

Tort on property to prevent a greater harm.

Public Necessity: unlimited privilege
Private Necessity: qualified privilege, still have to pay for damage caused

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
30
Q

When is “discipline” a valid defense to an intentional tort?

A

Teachers/parents can use reasonable force to discipline a child (spanking)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
31
Q

What are the common law prima facie elements of the tort of defamation?

A

(1) False and defamatory statement
(2) of and concerning the π
(3) Publication
(4) damages

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
32
Q

What counts as a “defamatory statement” for the tort of defamation?

A

A false statement that injures the plaintiff’s reputation (something fairly serious)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
33
Q

Concerning the tort of defamation, what is a common issue with the element “of and concerning the π”?

A

If the statement refers to a group, the π’s claim may depend on how large the group is.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
34
Q

For the tort of defamation, what counts as “publication”?

A

The statement must be communicated to a third person who is capable of understanding the statement. (third person can’t be secret eavesdropper)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
35
Q

What are the two different types of defamation claims?

A

(1) slander (spoken defamation)

2) libel (written/broadcast defamation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
36
Q

When can a plaintiff recover presumed damages (require no proof of actual damages) for defamation?

A

Slander per se:

(1) statements that impune π in trade/profession
(2) accusations of a serious crime
(3) statement that π has a loathsome disease
(4) Impute on chastity of a woman

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
37
Q

What are the common law defenses to defamation?

A

(1) Consent
(2) Truth of statement
(3) Absolute privilege (3 categories)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
38
Q

When does a ∆ have absolute privilege as a defense to a defamation claim?

A

(1) statements in the course of judicial proceedings
(2) statements in the course of legislative proceedings
(3) statements between spouses

39
Q

What level of fault must a π prove for her prima facie defamation claim?

A

π is Public Person: ∆ must have actual malice (knew falsity and still published)

π is Private Person: ∆ must have been at least negligent

40
Q

What must a π show to recover presumed or punitive damages for a defamation claim?

A

If the matter is of public concern, π must prove actual malice to recover punitive or presumed damages

41
Q

What is the tort of “appropriation”?

A

(1) Use of π’s name or picture for commercial advantage w/o permission
(2) newsworthy use is okay

42
Q

What is the tort of “intrusion”?

A

(1) Interference with a plaintiff’s seclusion in a way that would be highly offensive to a reasonable person
(2) π must be in a place where there is an expectation of privacy
(3) Fallback- IIED

43
Q

What is the tort of “false light”?

A

The widespread dissemination of information that is in some way inaccurate and would be highly offensive to a reasonable person

44
Q

What is the tort of “public disclosure of private facts”?

A

The widespread dissemination of factually accurate information that would normally be confidential and the disclosure of which would be highly offensive to a reasonable person.

45
Q

What are the elements of a prima facie fraud claim? (5)

A

(1) Affirmative material misrepresentation
(2) Fault (scienter)
(3) Intention to induce reliance
(4) Actual and justifiable reliance
(5) Actual damages

46
Q

What are the types of intentional interference with business relations?

A

(1) Inducing Breach of Contract
- -ex: pay someone to breach
(2) Interference with Contractual Relations
- -ex: buy out all the supplies someone else needs to perform a contract
(3) Interference with Prospective Economic Advantage (hard to prove)
- -ex: telling everyone to stop using π’s service

47
Q

What are the claims a π may make for wrongful institution of legal proceedings?

A

(1) Malicious prosecution: improper purpose/no probable cause
(2) Abuse of process: ulterior motive or improper purpose of legal process

48
Q

What are the elements of a claim for negligence?

A

(1) Duty
(2) Breach
(3) Causation (in fact and proximate)
(4) Damages

49
Q

To whom does a negligent ∆ owe a duty?

A

(1) all foreseeable victims
(2) πs who are foreseeable AMOL: rescuers, viable fetuses

Note: on bar exam, most victims are foreseeable

50
Q

What is the required duty of care to avoid being negligent?

A

Care of a “reasonably prudent person under the same or similar circumstances.”

51
Q

How is the duty of care adjusted to people with above-average or below-average abilities?

A

(1) superior abilities ARE taken into account
(2) the RP standard is adjusted to account for physical disabilities
(3) below-average abilities are not taken into account (too bad for dumb ∆)

52
Q

What level of care is required for children?

A

Majority: “reasonable child of like age, intelligence, and experience,” UNLESS:
-engaged in adult activity

Minority: Rule of Sevens
1-7: incapable of negligence
7-13: rebuttable presumption of incapable of negligence
14+: rebuttable presumption of capable of negligence

53
Q

What level of care is required for professionals?

A

knowledge and skill of an “ordinary member in that profession in good standing.”

54
Q

What are some particular issues to look for in a professional malpractice case?

A

(1) medical malpractice - often informed consent

(2) legal malpractice - π must prove causation

55
Q

What level of care does a landowner owe to undiscovered trespassers?

A

None.

56
Q

What level of care does a landowner owe to discovered trespassers?

A

Activities: reasonable care

Conditions: known man-made death traps

57
Q

What level of care does a landowner owe to a licensee (social guest)?

A

Activities: reasonable care

Conditions: protect from concealed, known dangers

58
Q

What level of care does a landowner owe to an invitee (open to the public)?

A

Activities: reasonable care

Conditions: concealed and known (or should have known) dangers

59
Q

How can a land owner satisfy his legal obligation in a question about a static condition?

A

(1) make condition safe, or

(2) give a warning

60
Q

What if someone is injured by an open and obvious condition on a landowner’s property?

A

The π will almost always lose

61
Q

What two questions need to be asked to apply the doctrine of negligence per se?

A

(1) Is this the class of person this law is meant to protect?
(2) Is this the type of harm/risk that the law is meant to prevent?

62
Q

What are some exceptions to the application of negligence per se?

A

(1) If following the statute would have actually been more dangerous under the circumstances
(2) Compliance w/ the law is impossible under the circumstances

63
Q

What is the law on the duty to rescue?

A

(1) No general duty to rescue

64
Q

What exceptions are there to the common law rule regarding the duty to rescue?

A

Duty to rescue IF:

(1) ∆ put π in peril
(2) Relationship:
- (a) Close family
- (b) Common carrier/innkeeper
- (c) Invitee (often business)
(3) Duty to control third persons
- (a) ∆ must have ability and authority to control (mom and kid)

65
Q

What are the most likely fact patterns for liability under the tort of negligent infliction of emotional distress?

A

(1) Zone of Danger Rule
- (a) π is in physical risk + later physical manifestation of emotional distress

(2) Bystander Recover
- (a) π @ scene @ time of event and close relationship w/ victim

66
Q

When analyzing the element of “breach” in a negligence case, how does the court treat evidence of custom?

A

Always admissible, never conclusive.

“Everybody does it this way”
-everyone may be overly cautious, or may all be negligent

67
Q

When and how will the court apply the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur?

A

Desperate π doesn’t know precisely what happened.

π must prove:

(1) the event is one that does not normally occur in the absence of negligence
(2) any negligence should be attributed to ∆- ∆ was the one who could have prevented

Then π will get to the jury

68
Q

What are the tests for causation in fact for a prima facie negligence claim?

A

(1) “But for” test (primary)
(2) “Substantial factor” - used w/ commingled causes (pollution cases)
(3) Burden shifting - multiple ∆s, known who caused b/c circumstances make difficult to tell

69
Q

What question should you ask when analyzing proximate cause?

A

When you saw ∆ was breaching a duty, is this the type of risk you were concerned about?

70
Q

What are the basic rules of direct cause fact patterns and proximate cause?

A

(1) Unforeseeable intervening cause + unforeseeable result = ∆ wins
(2) Foreseeable result + foreseeable intervening cause = π wins

71
Q

Which intervening causes almost NEVER cut off the ∆’s liability?

A

(1) Subsequent Medical Malpractice
(2) Negligent Rescue from risk caused by ∆
(3) Reaction forces - other people react to ∆’s negligence
(4) Subsequent diseases or accidents (infections and falling off crutches

72
Q

When should ∆, if possible, anticipate an intervening cause (proximate cause)

A

(1) Negligence of a 3rd Party
(2) Criminal conduct of a 3rd Party
(3) Predicted acts of God (weather predicts windstorm)

73
Q

What are the elements of a typical personal injury award?

A

(1) Past/future medical expenses
(2) Past/future lost income
(3) Pain and suffering

74
Q

What is the “eggshell plaintiff” rule?

A

A ∆ is liable for the full extent of damage he causes, even if the extent was unforeseeable

75
Q

What are the defenses to negligence?

A

(1) Contributory Negligence (abolished in most states)
(2) Assumption of the Risk
(3) Comparative Negligence

76
Q

What are the traditional rules of contributory negligence?

A

(1) Recovery is completely barred.

(2) “Last clear chance” doctrine likely applied.

77
Q

What are the traditional rules of assumption of the risk?

A

(1) Recovery is barred
(2) More likely to be applied for recreational activities
(3) Absence of an alternative destroys voluntariness
(4) Emergency situations destroy voluntariness

78
Q

What are the types of Comparative Negligence doctrines?

A

(1) Pure: π always gets something

(2) Modified: π recovery barred @ 49/50% fault

79
Q

If we are in a pure comparative fault jurisdiction, what is the one defense that still may bar recovery?

A

Express assumption of risk

80
Q

What areas of tort law are typically strict liability torts?

A

(1) Animals
(2) Abnormally Dangerous Activities
(3) Product Related Injury
(4) Private Nuisance
(5) Public Nuisance

81
Q

What are the typical rules of liability regarding animals?

A

(1) SL for foreseeable harm caused by non-household trespassing animals
(2) Injury caused by wild animal, strict liability
(3) Injury caused by domesticated animal, only strict liability if ∆ knew of dangerous propensities in advance

82
Q

What are the attributes of “abnormally dangerous activities”?

A

(1) Incapable of being conducted w/o inherently high risk
(2) If harm occurs, it is likely to be severe
(3) Activity must be uncommon, atypical, or unusual in the community

83
Q

What are the elements of a prima facie case for strict product liability?

A

(1) ∆ is merchant is these products
(2) Product is defective
(3) Defect existed when it left ∆’s hands
(4) π made foreseeable use of product

84
Q

What are the different types of product defects that are possible?

A

(1) Manufacturing defects (this particular one is dangerous)
(2) Design Defect (must show RAD)
(3) Warning defect

85
Q

What are the defenses to a product liability claim?

A

(1) π’s use was unintended and unforeseeable
(2) Assumption of the risk
(3) Comparative fault
(4) Adequate warning (gets away from Strict Libaility)
(5) Product was incidental to a service (not a true product sale)- so SL not available

86
Q

What are the elements of a private nuisance claim?

A

Substantial and unreasonable interference with use and enjoyment of land.

87
Q

What are the elements of a public nuisance claim?

A

Conduct that causes physical or moral harm to the public in general.

Private plaintiff may bring an action if she suffers an injury different than that of the general public.

Ex: Dumping toxic chemicals in the river, kills π’s commercial fish operation

88
Q

What are the tests for employer liability for employee torts?

A

(1) Scope of employment
(2) Detour vs. frolic
(3) Employer not liable for employee’s intentional torts, unless violence is part of the job
(4) Employer not liable for independent contractor torts unless:
- (a) IC engaged in inherently dangerous activity
- (b) hiring of known problem IC (public policy)

89
Q

Are automobile owners vicariously liable for the torts of people driving their car?

A

(1) Generally no
(2) Exceptions:
- (a) Family car states
- (b) Permissive use states
- (c) Direct liability (giving keys to drunk friend)

90
Q

What are the different types of actions relating to death via tort?

A

(1) Wrongful death action: for family’s own loss of support and companionship
(2) Survival Actions: claims actually on behalf of decedent

91
Q

Can family members sue each other?

A

(1) Majority, yes.

(2) Minority, Family immunity

92
Q

Can a charitable organization be sued?

A

Yes, charitable immunity has been abolished in most jurisdictions.

93
Q

Can the government be sued?

A

(1) Immunity for normal government actions, but

(2) No immunity when engaged in “proprietary functions”—stuff normally done by private citizens