Administrative Law Flashcards
What are the two steps to a bar question on administrative law?
(1) What did the agency do wrong from the individual/business perspective?
(2) What defenses are available to the agency action from the agency perspective?
How do you identify an administrative law bar question?
(1) Is there a state/federal agency named in the question?
(2) Has the Oregon legislature or US Congress given authority in a statute to an agency to implement a policy by writing rules, imposing penalties, or hearing appeals of individuals/corporations affected by the statute?
What is the basic factual structure of an administrative law bar question?
(1) Societal problem and legislative delegation to agency
(2) Agency makes rules
(3) Person/business violates rules and agency investigates
(4) Person appeals to agency and loses
(5) Person goes to court
Which laws apply to which administrative law questions?
Federal or State Constitution:
(1) Due process clause, to see if hearing was fair
(2) Standing, ripeness
(3) Investigations - search and seizure
Oregon Administrative Procedures Act (OAPA)
(1) Were state agency procedures followed?
(2) All actions by Oregon state Agencies
Federal Administrative Procedures Act (FAPA)
(1) Federal agency actions
What are the three basic things that OAPA does?
(1) Procedures for writing rules/regulations
(2) How to conduct administrative hearings
(3) Tells courts how/when it can review agency regulations and hearing decisions
What are the three actions that administrative agencies take?
(1) Rulemaking - act like legislature
(2) Adjudication - act like court
(3) Investigation - act like cops
What is the tip-off that there is a rulemaking issue in the question?
(1) Legislature passes a statute that empowers an agency to implement a program/policy by making rules
What is the standard for proper delegation by the legislature to an administrative agency?
minimal direction in the statute or even its legislative history about the nature of the agency’s power and who is to exercise it
What is an “ultra vires” action by an agency?
Agency action that goes beyond the power it is given by the enabling legislation
What are the two ways that federal agencies may make policies?
(1) Writing Rules
(2) Case-by-case adjudication, BUT:
Case-by-case method struck down when:
(1) party detrimentally relies on prior agency decision, and
(2) hardship on the party is greater than the public harm, and it was an innocent act
In what ways may Oregon administrative agencies make rules?
Writing rules is the only acceptable method.
Adjudication method is not allowed for Oregon agencies.
What counts as a “rule” for administrative law purposes?
A statement of general applicability and future effect prescribing or interpreting law, policy, or procedure.
What are four examples of actions that are NOT within the “rulemaking” procedures?
(1) Statements of internal agency policy
(2) Interpretive and policy statements
(3) Permissible construction of statute or prior rule
(4) Rule has no practical impact on any client
What is the effect of failing to follow the proper administrative procedures in rulemaking (comment and notice)?
The action is void.
What are the FAPA rulemaking procedures?
Two Methods:
(1) Formal Rule Making:
- (a) Hold trial-like procedure to write the rule
- (b) “on the record after a hearing” = need formal rule making
(2) Informal Rulemaking Requirements:
- (a) Notice published in federal register; description of the issues in the rule
- (b) Comment: public can comment, in writing; not right to oral testimony or present witnesses
- (c) Publish the final rule in the federal register w/ concise statement of the basis of the rule and its purpose
What are the requirements for informal rule making under FAPA?
(1) Notice published in the federal register w/ a description of the issues in the proposed rule
(2) Public may comment in writing
(3) Publication of the final rule in the federal register with a concise statement of the basis of the rule and its purpose
When should you discuss hybrid rule making under FAPA?
Only if the enabling legislation has specific procedures that are different than the typical two methods of rule making under FAPA
What are the requirements for rule making under OAPA?
Informal Rule Making Requirements:
(1) Notice in the Secretary of State bulletin, at least 21 days before the effective date of the rule
(2) Public Comment: in writing, but-
- (a) If 10 or more people request, agency must provide for oral testimony at a public hearing
(3) File the final rule
Under OAPA, what content must public notice of a proposed rule contain?
(1) Subject matter and purpose of rule
(2) statutory authority for rule
(3) need for rule
(4) fiscal impact statement
(5) time, place, manner for public comment in writing
(6) request for public comment on possible alternative options for achieving the goals of the rule
What is the exception to the OAPA Rulemaking requirements?
Temporary Rules may be issued w/o notice and comment IF:
(1) there is an emergency, and
(2) failure to act will result in serious prejudice to the public, and
(3) the rule will only last 180 days, maximum
Who has standing to challenge an Oregon Agency rulemaking procedure?
(1) Any person, or
(2) Any organization that was adversely affected by the rule or was a party to the agency proceeding, or if specific statute grants organizational standing
Where does a challenger file a challenge to an Oregon Agency rulemaking procedure?
Files directly to the Oregon Court of Appeals
If a challenger challenges the procedures used to create a rule under OAPA to the Oregon Court of Appeals, what is the record used?
Record is limited to:
(1) the authorizing statute
(2) The rule itself
(3) the documents showing procedural compliance with OAPA
What is the statute of limitations for challenging a rule under OAPA?
2 years from the date the rule goes into effect
What are the types of challenges are there to an administrative rule under OAPA?
(1) Substantive - ultra vires action or unconstitutional, or
(2) Procedural; agency did not comply with OAPA’s notice and comment requirements
What are the two issues in agency adjudications?
(1) Does the person have a right to a hearing at all?
(2) If yes, did the agency hearing have enough PROCESS to be fair?
How does a person know whether they have a right to a hearing in agency adjudications?
Neither FAPA nor OAPA give a right to a hearing, so
(1) what language was used when the agency was authorized action under the enabling legislation?
(2) Procedural due process of the 5th and 14th Amendments
When is there a right to an administrative hearing in front of Federal Agencies?
(1) If authorizing statute or rule says “On the record after an opportunity for an agency hearing,” or
(2) if there is a constitutional right to a hearing