Torts Flashcards

1
Q

Elements of Intentional Torts

A

Requires an act
Intent to bring physical or mental effect
Causation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Intent for Torts

A

Either desire or purpose OR

Knows w/ substantial certainty effect will occur

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Transferred Intent Torts

A

Same tort different person
Different tort same person
Different tort different person
Cannot be invoked w/ conversion or IIED

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Causation Intentional Torts

A

Need not be direct (i.e. setting in motion)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Assault Tort

A

Intentional causing of an
Apprehension of an
Imminent
Harmful or offensive contact

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Apprehension Assault

A

Must be reasonable

Must be aware

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Imminent Assault

A

Apparent present ability to
Carry out threat
Not future or hypothetical harm

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Harmful or offensive contact Assault

A

Touching that causes pain or bodily damage OR

Offends reasonable person’s sense of dignity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Battery Tort

A

Intentional infliction of
Harmful or offensive
Bodily conduct

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Harmful or offensive Battery

A

Touching that causes pain or bodily damage OR

Offends reasonable person’s sense of dignity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Bodily conduct Battery

A

Can be indirect including contact w/

Object closely identified w/ plaintiff’s body

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

False Imprisonment

A

Intentionally causes
Plaintiff to be confined, restrained or detained to
Bounded area w/ no reasonable means of escape
Plaintiff is either aware or harmed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Plaintiff to be confined, restrained or detained to False Imprisonment

A

Use of physical force, threats, duress,

Invalid legal authority OR refusing safe means of escape

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Shopkeeper’s privilege

A

For reasonable time and manner
Detain suspected shoplifter
Typically 10-15 minutes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Bounded area False Imprisonment

A

Can be large and does not have to be stationary

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Plaintiff is either aware or harmed False Imprisonment

A

Must be conscious or, if not

Must be harmed in some way

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

IIED

A

Intentional or reckless infliction of
Severe emotional or mental distress caused by
Defendant’s extreme & outrageous conduct

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Intent IIED

A

Desire or
Knows w/ substantial certainty OR
Reckless disregard for high
Probability distress will occur

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Severe emotional or mental distress IIED

A

Beyond reasonable person should endure
Can be evidenced by defendant’s conduct
Hypersensitivity
Only liable if defendant knew of sensitivity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Extreme & outrageous conduct IIED

A

Beyond all possible bounds of decency
Usually if defendant in position of
Authority or influence OR
Plaintiff member of group w/ heightened sensitivity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

3rd Party Liability IIED

A

Plaintiff physically present & known by defendant AND
Close relation to other person OR
Suffers bodily harm as result of distress

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Trespass to Land

A
Can be brought by anyone w/ legal possession; not just owner
Intentional 
Physical invasion to
Land of another
Mistake of fact not defense
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Physical invasion Trespass to Land

A

Entry w/ out permission
Remaining w/ out right to be there OR
Placing or projecting object w/out permission

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Trespass to Chattel

A
Intentional
Interference w/ use or possession
Of chattel
Damages
Mistake of fact not defense
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Interference w/ use or possession Trespass to Chattel
Owner precluded from using or possessing | Typically temporary
26
Damages Trespass to Chattel
Actual damages Loss of value caused by loss of use OR Cost of repair
27
Conversion
Intentional Interference w/ use or possession that So substantial warrants full value Damages
28
Interference w/ use or possession that Conversion
Sells to 3rd party Refuses to give back OR Destroys
29
So substantial warrants full value Conversion
``` Courts take into account: Duration & extent of interference Intent to assert right inconsistent w/ Rightful possess w/ good faith Expense or inconvenience to plaintiff Extent of harm ```
30
Damages Conversion
FMV at time of conversion
31
Self Defense Torts
``` Reasonable force to prevent Threatened harm or offensive contact AND Threatened confinement or imprisonment Deadly force: Only allowed if defendant in Danger of death or SBI Degree of force: Only degree necessary to Prevent threatened harm ```
32
Defense of Others Torts
Reasonable force to defend Another when Reasonably believes that other person Could have used force to defend himself
33
Defense of Property Torts
Reasonable force to defend against Tortious harm to property Warning required unless appears futile or dangerous Deadly force: Only if non-deadly force will not suffice AND reasonably believes danger of death or SBI NO mechanical devices (i.e. Home Alone)
34
Recapture of Chattel
Reasonable force to regain possession if: Fresh pursuit NO deadly force
35
Consent Defense Torts
May be express or implied Scope: Not beyond what consented to Express or Implied
36
Express Consent Defense Torts
Must be willing and knowing Consent by mistake valid defense Consent by fraud invalid if essential matter
37
Implied Consent Defense Torts
Emergency Injuries arising from athletic contests Mutual consent to combat
38
Defense of Necessity Torts
Enters land or interferes with property to Prevent injury or severe harm Private or Public
39
Private Defense of Necessity Torts
Must pay for actual damages caused Not liable for nominal damages Landowner may not use force to exclude
40
Public Defense of Necessity Torts
When necessary to protect | Large number of people from public calamities
41
Insanity Defense Torts
Generally no defense if able to | Form requisite intent to do so
42
Negligence Torts
Defendant’s conduct imposes Unreasonable risk upon another Resulting in injury Duty Breach Causation Damages
43
Duty Negligence
``` Act as reasonable person Who is it owed to Foreseeable plaintiffs (majority): In the zone of danger Everyone (minority): Including unforeseeable ```
44
Standard of Care Duty
Reasonable person under circumstances Physical characteristics of defendant Voluntarily intoxicated held to same standard as sober Not mental characteristics
45
Special Duties Negligence
``` Common carrier Innkeepers Automobile drivers Special relationship Causing the danger Volunteer assistance ```
46
Common carrier Duty
Highest duty of care w/ | Practical operation of business
47
Innkeepers Duty
``` Ordinary negligence (majority) Slight negligence (minority) ```
48
Automobile drivers Duty
``` Ordinary care (majority) Refrain from wanton & willful misconduct (minority) ```
49
Special relationship Duty based on:
Business or landowner holding premises open to public Landlords and tenants Or other special relationships
50
Volunteer assistance
Must proceed w/ reasonable care
51
Professional Duties
Required to possess knowledge and skill | Of their profession or occupation
52
Fireman's Rule
Risk takers are prohibited from suing or | Injuries stemming from assumed risk of profession
53
Children Duties
Conform to conduct of child of like Age, intelligence, and experience Exception Child engaged in adult activity (i.e. driving)
54
Bailor Duties
For gratuitous, bailor must: Inform of known, dangerous defects in chattel Bailment for hire Inform of defects of which should know
55
Bailee duties
``` Sole benefit for bailor Standard is low Sole benefit for bailee Higher standard of care Mutual benefit Ordinary standard of care ```
56
Land Duties
Off Premises Trespassers Invitee Licensee
57
Dutiy to Off Premises Injuries
Not liable for injuries resulting from natural conditions
58
Duty to Trespassers
Owes no duty to undiscovered trespassers but | Must refrain from willful, wanton, or intentional misconduct
59
Duty to Discovered Trespasser
Warn or protect against concealed | Dangerous artificial conditions
60
Duty to Undiscovered Trespasser
``` No duty unless owner should Reasonably have known trespassers Entering land Then use reasonable care No duty to inspect ```
61
Attractive Nuisance
``` Liable to trespassing children if Artificial condition poses Unreasonable risk of SBI AND Because of age, children cannot Appreciate danger or do not find Burden of eliminating danger Slight compared to risk of harm AND Owner fails to exercise reasonable care ```
62
Duty to Invitees
``` One who enters land in response to Invitation by owner to do Business w/ owner OR Public invitee for land open To public at large ```
63
Non-Delegable Duties
Make reasonable inspection to Find hidden dangers AND Take affirmative action to remedy
64
Duty to Licensee
``` One who enters land w/ owner’s consent For his own purpose (social guest) Duty to: Warn to all known dangerous conditions that Create unreasonable risk of harm that Unlikely to discover AND to use Reasonable care in conducting activities NO duty to repair or inspect ```
65
Negligence Per Se
Criminal or regulatory statute imposes specific duty Establishes duty and breach Must still prove causation and damages
66
Req of Negligence Per Se
Violation of statute W/ in class of people intended to be protected Harm statute intended to protect against If fails, consider regular negligence
67
Negligence Per Se Excused if:
Compliance creates greater risk of harm Reasonable under circumstances Statutory vagueness or ambiguity Violations by plaintiff deemed comparative negligence
68
Breach Negligence
When defendant’s conduct fails to | Conform to applicable standard of care
69
Trad Breach Negligence
What reasonably prudent person would do
70
Cost-Benefit Analysis Breach Negligence
Unreasonableness of risk vs | Utility of act
71
Res Ipsa Loquitur
Establishes breach in situations where | Event creates an inference defendant likely negligent
72
Elements of Res Ipsa Loquitur
Ordinarily not occur in absence of negligence Cause w/ in exclusive control Not due to action by plaintiff
73
Modern Trends Res Ipsa Loquitur
Shifts burden of medical holding all jointly and severally liable Products liability when came from upstream Generous interpretation of exclusivity
74
Actual Causation
But for defendant’s act, | Injury would not have occurred
75
Multiple Tortfeasors/Multiple Possible Causation
Substantial factor test Concurrent tortfeasors acting in concert Alternate causation
76
Substantial factor test
More than one at fault and Conduct combined caused harm Negligence was substantial factor to harm
77
Concurrent tortfeasors acting in concert
Joint and several liability
78
Alternate causation
Two acts of negligence, only one could Cause injury but unknown Burden shifts to defendants to show not them
79
Proximate Causation
Reasonable foreseeability | Liable for all harm reasonably foreseeable
80
Eggshell-skull plaintiff
Liable for unforeseen harm that may be Increased b/c of plaintiff’s pre-existing Physical or mental conditions or vulnerability
81
Intervening Causes Proximate Cause
Foreseeable, then still liable: I.e. medical malpractice or negligence by rescuers Unforeseeable, generally not liable if Broke chain of causation: I.e. fender bender, get hits by another car
82
Collateral Source Rule
Benefits from outside sources (P’s insurance) not Credited against liability BUT D’s insurance is Modernly statutes have eliminated or modified
83
Negligent infliction of emotional distress (NIED)
Liable when defendant engages in Negligent conduct that causes plaintiff to Suffer serious emotional distress
84
Types of NIED
``` Actual impact or threat OR Zone of danger OR Bystander but must be Related and Personally witnessed OR Special relationship (i.e. mishandling a corpse or misdiagnosis) ```
85
Negligence Defenses
Contributory negligence Comparative Negligence Assumption of Risk
86
Contributory negligence
Negligence on part of plaintiff | Bars recovery
87
Comparative Negligence
``` Negligence on part of plaintiff but Does not bar recovery Pure: Reduces in proportion to fault Partial Comparative Negligence: Reduces if less than 51% Bars if more than 50% ```
88
Assumption of Risk
Bars if assumed risk of damage where Knew of risk and voluntarily consented Comparative fault May reduce recovery but does not bar
89
Strict Liability
Held liable for activities regardless of Precautions taken to prevent harm Animals or Abnormally Dangerous Activity
90
Trepass of Animal Strict Liability
Liable if | Reasonably foreseeable damage
91
Wild animals Strict Liability
Not custom to keep type of animal S/L despite precautions so long as Arises from dangerous propensity of animal OR Which owner knows about S/L for fearful reaction of unrestrained animal No S/L of undiscovered trespasser EXCEPT vicious watchdog
92
Domestic animals Strict Liability
S/L if knows or reason to know of Dangerous propensities and harmful results Public stray, then negligence
93
Abnormally Dangerous Activities
High degree of risk or serious harm Cannot be eliminated by exercise of reasonable care Danger outweighs activity’s value to community Not appropriate for location Not common activity
94
Defenses to Strict Liability
Assumption of risk | NOT contributory negligence
95
Products Liability
Liability of seller of tangible item, which Because of defect causes injury to purchaser User or bystander
96
Intent Products Liability
Defendant intended consequences or Knew to substantial certainty to occur Defenses same as intentional torts
97
Strict Products Liability Elements
Product was defective Defect existed when left defendant’s control (actual cause) Caused injury when used in foreseeable way (proximate cause) Damages
98
Types of Strict Products Liability
Manufacturing defect Design Defect Failure to Warn
99
Manufacturing defect
Product deviated from intended design
100
Design Defect
``` Consumer Expectation Test Less safe than ordinary consumer would expect Risk-utility Test If risks outweigh benefits Must show reasonable alternative design ```
101
Failure to Warn
``` Foreseeable risk NOT Obvious to ordinary user Prescription drugs Warning goes to doctor UNLESS Marketed directly to consumers (more common now) ```
102
Damages Products Strict Liability
No recovery for purely economic loss
103
Defenses to Products Strict Liability
``` Assumption of risk Comparative negligence BUT NOT If plaintiff’s neg or misuse foreseeable Disclaimers not effective Compliance w/ industry standards NOT defense ```
104
Negligence Products
Retailers and wholesalers rarely liable | Manufacturer likely could be
105
Types of Warranties Products Liabilities
Express Implied Warranty of Merchantability Fitness for Particular Purpose
106
Express Warranty Products Liabilities
Statement of fact or promise concerning goods | Only need to show did not live up to promise
107
Misrepresentation Products Liability
Liable for misrepresentation of fact when Statement was material fact concerning Quality or uses of goods AND Seller intended to induce reliance buyer AND Buyer did in fact rely Must still prove causation and damages
108
Defenses of Misrepresentation Products Liability
Comparative | UNLESS intentional
109
Types of Privacy Claims
Misappropriation Intrusion into Seclusion False Light Public Disclosure of Private Facts
110
Misappropriation
Unauthorized use of plaintiffs Picture or name for Defendant’s commercial advantage
111
Intrusion into Seclusion
Intrusion into private aspect of plaintiff’s Life in private place Highly objectionable to Reasonable person
112
False Light
One attributes to plaintiff views he does not hold Objectionable to reasonable person under circum Publication is public If public interest, malice required Truth not defense
113
Public Disclosure of Private Facts
Public disclosure of private facts that Not matter of legitimate public concern Objectionable to reasonable person
114
Public Nuisance
Substantial, unreasonable interference w/ Health, morals, welfare, safety, or prop rights to community Only if: Suffered damage different in kind AND Not merely in degree
115
Private Nuisance
Substantial Unreasonable interference with Another private individual’s Use or enjoyment of his land
116
Substantial Private Nuisance
Interference offensive, inconvenient OR | Annoying to average person
117
Unreasonable interference Private Nuisance
Harm caused outweighs utility OR Harm caused greater than Should be required to bear
118
Defenses to Nuisance
Legislative authority Persuasive but not absolute Assumption of risk and comparative neg IF Complaint rests on neg theory Coming to nuisance Only for sole purpose of Brining harassing lawsuit
119
Fraud Misrepresentation
``` Common law fraud or deceit Misrepresentation of material fact Scienter Intent to induce plaintiff’s reliance Causation Justifiable reliance Damages ```
120
Fraud Misrepresentation Justifiable reliance
Obviously false or opinion
121
Fraud Misrepresentation Damages
Actual economic loss/consequential damages No nominal No damages for emotional distress
122
Negligent misrepresentation
Misrepresentation in business or professional capacity Acted w/ no reasonable grounds for believing misrep to be true Intent to induce plaintiff reliance Causation Justifiable reliance Defenses Damages
123
Malicious Prosecution
Institution of criminal proceedings against plaintiff Prosecutors immune from liability Termination of proceedings in plaintiff’s favor W/ no probable cause Improper purpose of accuser in bringing suit Damages
124
Abuse of Process
Intentionally misuses legal procedures (i.e. depos, discovery) For ulterior motive AND Defendant committed willful act in wrongful manner Caused damage to plaintiff
125
Intentional interference with Business Relations
Existence of valid contractual relationship OR valid business expectancy Defendant knew or should have known of relationship Intentional interference by defendant inducing breach Damages
126
Vicarious Liability Torts
When one person commits tortious act Against third party AND Special relationship between tortfeasor & defendant
127
Respondeat superior
When employee commits tort Employee is one who works subject to Close control of person who hired him During course and scope of employment Acting w/ intent to Further employer’s business purpose Even if act itself forbidden Employer liable
128
Independent Contractor Torts
One who hires independent contract Generally not liable UNLESS Employer neg in hiring them OR duty non-delegable b/c work occurs in public place OR involves inherently dangerous activity
129
Multiple Defendants
Jointly and severally liable where | Two or more negligent acts combine for cause
130
Contribution for Multiple Defendants
Allows defendant who Pays more than his pro rata share To obtain reimbursement for Amount paid over his share
131
Fed Gov't Immunity Torts
Traditionally immune but Now limited by FTCA Waived for intentional torts Committed by law enforcement
132
State Gov't Immunity Torts
Most states have waived immunity
133
Wrongful Death
Recovery for pecuniary injury resulting to spouse AND Next of kin for wrongful death AND Allows for loss of support and consortium
134
Defamation
Defamatory Statement Of/Concerning Plaintiff Published to 3rd Party
135
Defamatory Statement
False statement that holds plaintiff Up to contempt or public ridicule Opinions or true statements NOT Advance affect on rep
136
Of/Concerning Plaintiff
Plaintiff must be identifiable
137
Published to 3rd Party
Heard/Understood Republication identifying OG Speaker uncertainty to statement May still satisfy element
138
Types of Defamation
Libel (Written) Slander per se Slander
139
Libel (Written)
Damages Presumed
140
Slander per se
``` CLUB: Crime Loathsome disease Unclean woman Business/Profession Damages Presumed ```
141
Slander
Must show special damages
142
Private Person/Public Concern
``` Falsity Actual Malice OR Knowledge of falsity or Reckless disregard for truth By clear and convincing evidence Negligence AND Actual Injury ```
143
Public Figure/Public Official
``` Falsity AND Actual malice Knowledge of falsity or Reckless disregard for truth By clear and convincing evidence Damages Presumed ```
144
Defenses to Defamation
Truth Absolute Privilege Qualified Privilege
145
Truth Defense to Defamation
Don’t have to defend if falsity is element
146
Absolute Privilege Defense to Defamation
Remarks during judicial or legislative proceedings By Fed gov’t and state officials Between spouses
147
Qualified Privilege Defense to Defamation
Affecting important public interest In interest of defendant OR Third party Can be lost if defendant abuses w/ actual malice