Evidence Flashcards

1
Q

Logical relevance

A

Tendency to make more or less probable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Legal Relevance

A

Probative value outweighs

Danger of unfair prejudice, confusing court or misleading jury

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Authentication

A

Must produce sufficient evidence to support a finding the thing is what the proponent claims

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Physical Evid Auth

A

Distinctive characteristics or

Chain of Custody

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Demonstrative Evid Auth

A

If fair representation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Writings/Record Auth

A
Admission
Eyewitness
Voice ID
Handwriting verifications
Circumstantial evidence
Ancient documents:
More than 20 years old
Free from suspicion
Found where they would be kept
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Self Authentication

A
Public docs bearing gov’t seal
Certified copies of public record
Official publications by public authority
Notarized docs
Newspapers and periodicals
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

FRE Self Auth

A

Business records AND

Trade inscriptions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

BER

A

Requires original writing,

Photograph, or recording to be produced

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

FRE BER

A

Duplicates allowed unless content disputed OR

Unfair to admit the duplicate

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Exceptions to BER

A
Lost or destroyed
Proponent not acting in bad faith
In possession of opponent
Not obtainable by judicial process
Collateral matter
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Voluminous Writings

A

So voluminous can’t be conveniently
Introduced into evidence
Summary may be introduced

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Form of Question Obj

A
Leading
Compound
Facts not in Evidence
Non-Responsive
Narrative
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Witness Competency

A

Personal knowledge
Swear oath or affirmation
Understand duty to tell truth

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

FRE Age Witness Competency

A

Intelligence/maturity
Ability between truth and false
Understand importance in truth

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Dead Man’s Statute

A

Limits ability of witness to testify about

Transactions w/ people who now deceased

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Impeachment

A

Attacks credibility of testifying witness by one’s own testimony, testimony of another OR extrinsic evidence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Ways to Impeach

A
Untruthfulness
Prior Criminal Conviction
Bias
Capacity to Perceive/Remember
Contradiction
Prior Inconsistent Statement
Prior Consistent Statement
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Untruthfulness Impeachment

A
By reputation or opinion
Honesty only when truthfulness attacked
No extrinsic
Specific allowed on x-exam if probative
Must accept answer
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Prior Criminal Conviction Dishonesty

A

Crimes involving dishonesty allowed to challenge truthfulness within 10 years

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Prior Criminal Conviction Felony

A

Admissible UNLESS
Defendant witness
Reverse 403

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Bias Impeachment

A
Extrinsic allowed:
Friend or relative of party
Bears grudge against party
Business relationship w/ party
Leniency on pending crim case
Financial interest in outcome
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Capacity to Perceive Impeachment

A

Allowed to show witness
Diminished capacity to perceive
Extrinsic evid allowed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Contradiction Impeachment

A

Evidence to challenge underlying facts
If extrinsic, independent admissibility
Non-collateral matters only

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Prior Inconsistent Statement Impeachment
Inconsistent statement material to witness’ testimony Extrinsic inadmissible UNLESS given opp to explain or deny If under oath, may be for substantive truth Otherwise, impeachment Not allowed for collateral matter
26
Prior Consistent Statement Impeachment
Admissible to rebut recent Fabrication, improper influence or motive Must be before bias or motive
27
Recollection Refreshed
A witness may examine any item | “Refresh” Cannot read from it
28
Lay Opinion
Rationally based on witness perception Helpful to jury Not based on scientific or technical knowledge
29
Expert Opinion
Scien, tech, or spec knowledge, skill, training Reasonably relied on in field Criminal no opinion about mental state or condition element
30
Character Evidence
Inadmissible to show acted in accordance
31
Other Purpose Character Evidence
``` Allowed if: Opportunity Knowledge Motive Intent Absence of Mistake Identity Common Plan or Scheme ```
32
Character Evid Civil
Rarely allowed BUT Reputation, opinion or prior bad acts Allowed if trait essential element
33
Character At Issue
Rep or opinion if essential element
34
Character Defendant of him/herself in Crim
Reputation or opinion only UNLESS trait essential element Prosecution may rebut with same pertinent trait by rep or opin Cross-X allows specific instances Extrinsic not allowed to contradict witness’ testimony & prosecution must accept answer
35
Character Defendant of victim of Crim
``` Rep or opin only Prosecution may rebut by rep or opin NOT for rape victims Cross-X allows specific instances Extrinsic not allowed to contradict the witness’s testimony & prosecution must accept answer ```
36
Character Defendant claim first aggressor
Homicide by rep or opin to Rebut non-character evidence by Defense that victim first aggressor Cross-X allows spec instances
37
Character Rape or Sexual Assault
Prohibits exam of victim promiscuous or sexual activities, sexual history, behavior, and preferences
38
Exceptions to Character Rape or Sexual Assault
Source of semen, injury, or physical evid Sexual acts w/ defendant for consent Sexual acts w/ defendant by prosecution Crim if violates defendants con law rights Civil case if prob value substantially outweighs danger of harm to the victim or unfair prejudice to any party
39
Character Sexual misconduct of accused in sex crime
Plaintiff/pros against Defendant of prior, similar, wrongful sex or Child molest acts for any purpose by spec instances
40
DV, Child Abuse or Elder Abuse
Allows evid of prior DV, child abuse, or More than 10 years Inadmissible UNLESS In interest of justice
41
Policy Exclusions Evid
``` Subsequent Remedial Measures Insurance Plea Discussions Pay medical bills Negotiations ```
42
Subsequent Remedial Measures
``` Remedial measures that would have made injury less likely to occur Not allowed for: Negligence Culpable Conduct Defect in product or design Need warning instruction Except: Ownership or control Feasibility of precautionary measures ```
43
Insurance Evid
Inadmissible to show neg or wrongful Admissible to show bias or Prove agency, owner, or control
44
Plea Discussions Evid
Guilty plea withdrawn Nolo contendere plea Made w/ assistance of pros
45
Exceptions to Plea Discussions Evid
Allowed if made in same plea as another statement that has been introduced if statements should be considered together or in criminal proceeding for perjury and statement was made under oath, on record, and w/ attorney present
46
Pay medical bills Evid
Inadmissible to prove liability | Statements may be severed
47
Negotiations Evid
Validity or amount of disputed claim OR Impeach for PIS Only excluded if made after claim filed
48
Privileges Evid
Can limit party’s ability to demand info about specific communications made w/ certain relationships Holder of privilege holds power to claim or waive
49
Attorney/Client Privilege
Protects confidential conversations related to legal advice between lawyer and client Client holder of privilege Underlying info not privileged Does not survive death
50
Exceptions to Attorney/Client Privilege
Crime likely to lead to death or GBI Breach of duty by either Services for crime/fraud
51
Spousal Privilege
Cannot be compelled to testify against spouse Testifying spouse is holder FRE: Crim only
52
Exceptions to Spousal Privilege
``` One spouse against another Commit spouse Establish competence Crimes against spouse or children Invalid marriage ```
53
Marital Conversation Privilege
Spouse may not disclose Confidential comm made during marriage Survives death and divorce Joint holders of privilege
54
Exceptions to Marital Conversation Privilege
``` Crime/fraud Commit spouse Competence hearing Proceeding between spouses Criminal case against spouse or for children Juvenile proceeding Spouse defendant in crim and offers ```
55
Doctor/Patient Privilege
Made in confidence by examination | Patient holder of privilege
56
Exceptions Doctor/Patient Privilege
``` No privilege in crim Proceeding to recover damages for Patient conduct (good cause) Crime/Fraud Commitment Competence ```
57
Psychotherapist/Patient Privilege
Persons who are or are reasonably believed By patient to be someone involved in Mental health services or counseling Patient holder
58
Exceptions to Psychotherapist/Patient Privilege
``` Patient puts mental condition in issue Services for crime/fraud Dispute between psycho/patient Patient dangerous to self/others Therapist court appointed Patient minor and possible crime victim ```
59
Clergy/Penitent Privilege
Protects confidential communications between Clery/penitents Joint privilege
60
Hearsay
Out of court statement | Made for truth of matter asserted
61
Not Hearsay
``` Non-assertive conduct Effect on listener State of Mind Indirectly Impeach credibility Legally operative fact ```
62
Non-Hearsay
Prior Inconsistent Statement Prior Consistent Statement Prior Identification Party Admission
63
Prior Inconsistent Statement
Declarant testifies at current hearing Subject to x-exam Prior OOC inconsistent w/ current testimony Prior statement under oath
64
Prior Consistent Statement
Declarant testifies at current Subject to x-exam Prior OOS consistent with current Offered to rebut recent fabrication OR Acted under improper influence or motive OR Rehabilitate when attacked for other reason
65
Prior Identification
Declarant testifies at current Subject to x-exam Prior statement identifies as someone Declarant perceived earlier
66
Party Admission
Made by opposing party
67
Vicarious Party Admission
If employee, spokesperson, agent
68
Co-Conspirator Party Admission
Conspiracy existed Defendant and declarant same conspiracy Made in furtherance & during conspiracy No bootstrapping
69
Declarant Unavailable
``` Cause through no fault of proponent Prevents witness from testifying including Death, mental or disability Beyond subpoena power Invokes privilege Refuses after order Cannot recall subject matter ```
70
Exceptions Declarant Unavailable
Dying Declaration Former Testimony Forfeiture Statement Against Interest
71
Dying Declaration
``` Declarant unavailable Sense of immediate and impending death Must relate to cause of death Personal knowledge Homicide or civil case ```
72
Former Testimony
``` Declarant unavailable Primary issue of former hearing & current same Similar motive and interest to x-exam Criminal same party Civil same or party in predecessor ```
73
Forfeiture by Wrongdoing
Declarant unavailable | Must intend to deprive court of testimony
74
Statement Against Interest
Declarant unavailable Conscious statement against interest Crim needs corroborating circumstances
75
Exceptions Availability Doesn't Matter
``` Present Sense Impression Excited Utterance State of Mind Medical Treatment Past Recollection Recorded Business Records Public Records and Reports Final Judgment of Previous Conviction ```
76
Present Sense Impression
Made while or immediately after Describes or explains event Personal knowledge
77
Excited Utterance
Sufficiently startling event Declarant dominated by shock of event Relates to event Declarant has personal knowledge
78
State of Mind Evid Excep
Then existing physical or mental state Directly stated Is at issue Does not apply to memory or belief UNLESS relates to execution, revocation, id or terms UNLESS declarant’s will
79
Medical Treatment
Statement for diagnosis or treatment Pertinent to diagnosis or treatment Describes medical history, symptoms, or general cause
80
Past Recollection Recorded
Read into record if declarant testifying First-hand knowledge at some point Lacks sufficient recollection of event Record of some sort Made or adopted by declarant at or near event Record accurately reflects facts once knew
81
Business Records
``` Record of act, event, condition, or diagnosis First-hand knowledge Bus duty to acquire info & report it Made at or near event by someone w/ duty to record Part of regular course of bus Kept in regular course of bus Opponent no lack of trustworthiness Crim: no police observations ```
82
Public Records and Reports
Office’s activities Matter observed while under legal duty to report Exception crim case observations by law enforcement Civil case or evidence by defendant against gov’t in crim Factual findings from authorized investigation
83
Final Judgment of Previous Conviction
``` Judgment from trial or guilty plea Crime was felony Prove fact essential in judgment When offered by pros in crim other than impeach Judgment was against defendant ```
84
Hearsay Catchall
Does not fit within 803 or 804 Equivalent guarantees of trust offered as evid of material fact More probative than other evid for reasonableness on particular point Best serves these rules and justice Proponent give adverse party notice
85
Criminal Case 6th Amend
“In all crim prosecutions the accused Shall enjoy the right...to be confronted With the witnesses against him.”
86
Testimonial for 6th Amend
Under circumstances which Lead an objective witness to Reasonably believe the Statement would be used at trial
87
Judicial Notice
Process of establishing facts Without presenting evidence Facts not subject to reasonable dispute: Generally known within JDX Capable of accurate and ready determination by Source who cannot be reasonably questioned
88
Civil Judicial Notice
Must accept
89
Crim Judicial Notice
May find
90
Presumptions Evid
Switches burden of proof
91
Civil Presumptions
``` Operates to shift burden of: Producing evidence to opposing party Rebuttable presumptions Mail delivery Legitimacy Sanity That death is not suicide Death from seven years’ absence ```
92
Crim Presumptions
No criminal case presumption Both burdens on pros Beyond a reasonable doubt
93
Prelim Hearings Evid
Court decide prelim questions about witness qualified, privilege exists, or evidence admissible MUST conduct hearing prelim question outside presence of jury if: Hearing involves admissibility of confession Testifying defendant in criminal case requests OR Justice so requires