Tort - Vicarious Liability Flashcards
Reasons for vicarious liability
Employer in better position to compensate victim
Compulsory insurance
Employer exercises control over employees
Employer obtains benefit, should take burden
Encourages better training, supervision and control of employees
Elements of Vicarious liability
Tort committed by another
Employment relationship
In course of employment
Control test
Yewens v Noakes
Organisation test
Stevenson v MacDonald
Economic reality test
Ready Mixed Concrete - remuneration, control, provisions of contract
Warner Holidays
control, provision of tools, salary, tax, sick pay, control over hours, right to do other work (Argent), mutuality of obligations (O’Kelly)
Massey
Description of relationship is evidential, not conclusive
Generally employer remains liable for employee lent to another
Mersey Docks
Possible for both employers to be vicariously liable for the same employee if both entitled and obliged to control the employee’s actions
Viasystems
Course of Employment
Winfield:
- expressly or impliedly authorised
- unauthorised manner of doing something authorised
- necessarily incidental to work employee is employed to do
bus driver racing = in course of employment
Limpus v London General Omnibus
train porter pulled passenger off train = in course of employment
Bayley v Manchester Railway
Frolic of his own
Joel v Morrison
bus conductor drove bus - frolic
Beard v London General Omnibus
Bouncer hit plaintiff twice - once inside club (vicariously liable) and once outside club (not vicariously liable)
Daniel v Whetstone