General Defences Flashcards
Volenti criteria
Claimant:
- knew of risk
- voluntarily agreed to the risk of being injured by D
(- voluntarily agreed that there should be no legal liability for this)
Plaintiff accepted lift with drunk pilot
Morris v Murray - claimant’s drunkness had to be taken into account by court when determining whether he appreciated the danger involved
Voluntary consent is in addition to knowledge. Employees who know risks are not necessarily voluntarily agreeing
Smith v Charles Baker
Implied consent - spectators at dangerous sport
Hall v Brookland Auto Racing Club
Claimant must possess mental capacity to consent
Kirkham v Chief Constable of Greater Manchester Police
Volenti will not apply to a rescuer
Haynes v Harwood
Volenti may apply in non-urgent situation so person who interferes is not a rescuer
Cutler v United Dairies
Driving instructor had not agreed to be injured by learner
Nettleship v Weston
No implied agreement unless risk is so extreme that it is the equivalent of meedling with an unexploded bomb
Dann v Hamilton
Drunk student dived into swimming pool without checking depth
Ratcliffe v O’Connell
Volenti cannot be used by motorists against their passengers
s149 Road traffic Act
Guilty of contributory negligence if he reasonably ought to have foreseen that if he did not act as a reasonably prudent man, he might be hurt
Jones v Livox
Contributory negligence - an obviously incorrect valuation should’ve put claimant on alert
Cavendish v Henry Spencer
It does not matter that the claimant has no broken the law
Froom v Butcher
Allowances are made for a claimant who has been placed in an emergency or difficult dilemma
Jones v Boyce