Duty of Care Flashcards

1
Q

Caparo v Dickman

A

Is damage reasonably foreseeable? Is there sufficient proximity between claimant and defendant?
It is just fair and reasonable to impose a duto of care?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

police liable for operations

A

Rigby v Chief Constable of Northamptonshire

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

police not liable for policy/failure to apprehend criminals

A

Hill v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Police do not owe a duty of care to check property or respond to alarm

A

Alexandrou v Oxford

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

police held duty of care to mentally ill prisoner who committed suicide

A

Reeves v MPC

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Fireman ordered sprinkler to be turned off

A

Capital and Counties v Hampshire CC

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Fire brigade left scene before ensuring fire was properly extinguished

A

John Munroe v London Fire

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

fire service failed to ensure adequate supply of water

A

Church of Jesus Christ

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Acceptance of 999 call by ambulance establishes duty of care

A

Kent v Griffiths

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

HA failed to identify risks presented by dangerous outpatient. HA not liable as insufficient proximity

A

Palmer v Tees HA

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

No duty to be a good Samaritan, but law looks favourably on rescuers

A

Haynes v Harwood

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

No risk so not a rescue

A

Cutler v United Dairies

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Claimant must be foreseeable

A

Palsgraf v Long Island

Bourhill v Young

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Sufficient that class is foreseeable

A

Donoghue v Stevenson

Haley v London Electricity Board

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Liable for omissions where high degree of control over claimant by defendant

A

Reeves v MPC

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Assumption of responsibility - liability for omissions

A

Costello v CC of Northumbria Police

17
Q

Liability for omissions - defendant created risk

A

Capital and Counties v Hampshire CC

18
Q

Generally courts reluctant to impose duty where tort committed by a third party

A

Perl v Camden

19
Q

Duty for 3rd party where there is sufficient proximity between the defendant and claimant

A

Stansbie v Troman

20
Q

Duty for 3rd party where there is sufficient proximity between defendant and third party

A

Home Office v Dorset Yacht Club