Duty of Care Flashcards
Caparo v Dickman
Is damage reasonably foreseeable? Is there sufficient proximity between claimant and defendant?
It is just fair and reasonable to impose a duto of care?
police liable for operations
Rigby v Chief Constable of Northamptonshire
police not liable for policy/failure to apprehend criminals
Hill v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire
Police do not owe a duty of care to check property or respond to alarm
Alexandrou v Oxford
police held duty of care to mentally ill prisoner who committed suicide
Reeves v MPC
Fireman ordered sprinkler to be turned off
Capital and Counties v Hampshire CC
Fire brigade left scene before ensuring fire was properly extinguished
John Munroe v London Fire
fire service failed to ensure adequate supply of water
Church of Jesus Christ
Acceptance of 999 call by ambulance establishes duty of care
Kent v Griffiths
HA failed to identify risks presented by dangerous outpatient. HA not liable as insufficient proximity
Palmer v Tees HA
No duty to be a good Samaritan, but law looks favourably on rescuers
Haynes v Harwood
No risk so not a rescue
Cutler v United Dairies
Claimant must be foreseeable
Palsgraf v Long Island
Bourhill v Young
Sufficient that class is foreseeable
Donoghue v Stevenson
Haley v London Electricity Board
Liable for omissions where high degree of control over claimant by defendant
Reeves v MPC