Standard of Care Flashcards
Defendant must behave as a reasonable man
Blyth v Birmingham Waterworks
The man on the Clapham Omnibus
Hall v Brooklands
Reasonable man is not the paragon of circumspection
AC Billings v Riden
Learner driver judged by standard of ordinarily competent driver
Nettleship v Weston
Person does not have to do everything possible to prevent harm, only what a reasonable person would do
Etheridge v East Sussex CC
Reasonable man is free from over confidence and over apprehension
Glasgow Corporation v Muir
Professional standard - D must exercise the ordinary skill of an ordinary competent man exercising that particular art (not the highest expert skill
Bolam
For children test is the reasonable child of D’s age
Mullins v Richard
Junior doctor judged by standard of reasonably competent doctor in that field
Wilsher v Essex HA
Jeweller ear piercing = standard of reasonable jeweller
Philips v William Whiteley
DIY fanatic = standard of reasonable man, not carpenter
Wells v Cooper
professionals claiming to possess greater skill than that normally possessed by member of their profession still judged by standards of the ordinary reasonable member of their profession
Wimpey Construction v Poole
If the defendant takes on a task that he ought to know is beyond his capabilities, that may be evidence in itself of negligence
Greaves v Baynham
elderly man suffered stroke whilst driving. he was judged according to the standard of a reasonably competent driver. He should have stopped as soon as he realised he was being affected
Roberts v Ramsbottom
lorry driver crashed after suffering hypoglycaemic state. There was no evidence that he knew that his ability to drive had been impaired – judged against a reasonably competent driver who is unaware that he is suffering from such a condition
Mansfield v Weetabix