topic 3: attachment Flashcards
define attachment
a two-way, enduring emotional tie to a specific person
how can you tell if someone has an attachment
- a desire to be close to them
- become distressed when separated from the attachment figure
what did Woolf say about The Cry
there are 3 different cries that babies have
1. basic cry; hunger
2. angry cry
3. pain cry
what was discovered about facial preference?
facial preference in babies from 1 hour old, orientation to face-like stimuli from birth.
what is a social releaser
any behaviour that encourages a caregiver reaction from another person
eg. smiling, crying, laughing
what are caregiver behaviours
sensitive responsiveness
motherese/caregiverese - a slow, high pitched, song like way of talking to babies
what is reciprocity in interactions
each party responding to the other’s signals to sustain interaction, caregiver-infant interaction is a two-way process that can happen from 1 month old
e.g mother hugging baby in response to it crying
evidence for reciprocity in adult and baby interactions
there was an observation where an interaction was analysed frame by frame, to find that babies co-ordinate their actions in sequence to speech in the form of turn-taking conversations
what is interactional synchrony
when the caregiver and infant act so that their actions and emotions seem to mirror each other
outline the still face experiment, tronick
primary caregivers interacted with young babies normally then became emotionless
the babies reacted with grasping, crying, pointing, smiling etc. to get their attention
outline Schaffer and Emerson’s stages of Attachment
- asocial, 6 weeks
they show a similar response to people and objects - indiscriminate attachment, 6 weeks - 6 months
baby becomes more sociable and prefers general human company
comforted by anyone, don’t prefer particular people but are increasingly able to spot unfamiliar faces
- no stranger/separation anxiety - discriminate attachment, 7 months
separation anxiety, prefer to stay close to the primary caregiver and protest when they leave
- shows stranger and separation anxiety - multiple attachments, 10 months
form multiple strong emotional ties with major caregivers; parents/siblings/grandparents/childcare staff
known as secondary attachment
- has separation anxiety with >1 attachment figure
the study’s results indicate that attachments ar more likely to form with those that responded to the baby’s signals correctly, not who they spend the most time with
- named this; sensitive responsiveness
evaluate the stages of attachment; Schaffer and Emerson
+ naturalistic investigation, has high ecological validity
– the sample is only 60 and they’re all Glaswegian working class babies; the limited sample isn’t representative of the target pollution and can’t be generalised
+ BUT it has been repeated with many different samples and population with the same results; it is reliable
+ there is triangulation of data
the findings of the observer match up with the information from primary caregiver interviews, supporting fear of strangers
+ can be applied in healthcare
useful during transitions at around 7months+, can help parents understand why the child seems sp afraid suddenly
how do fathers act as primary caregivers
there is evidence that suggests that when fathers take on this role and become the PAF also, they are able to adapt to the more emotional role that is more commonly associated with mothers
outline the study comparing male primary care givers, female primary caregivers, male secondary caregivers and female secondary caregivers
Tiffany Field 1978
they filmed 4 month old babies in face-to-face interactions with male primary care givers, female primary caregivers, male secondary caregivers and female secondary caregivers
primary caregivers, both male and female, were found to spend more time smiling, imitating and holding babies more than secondary caregivers
- these behaviours are all part of reciprocity and interactional synchrony
outline the study of how attachments with different parents as a baby affect those as a teen
Grossman et al. 2002
longitudinal study
researchers investigated how behaviours of both parents related to the quality of the babies later attachments to others
they found that only the quality of a mothers attachment to the baby was related to their later attachments in adolescence, which suggests that attachment in fathers is less important than attachment in mothers
BUT, they found that the quality of a father’s play with babies was related to the quality of adolescent attachments; so fathers may just have a different role that is based more on play and simulation
what statistics did Schaffer and Emerson discover surrounding who was a babies PAF
7 month ish:
father - 3%
father+mother as joint - 27%
by the time they reached 18 months:
75% of fathers become an important attachment figure
evaluate studies on the role of the father
— societal bias can cloud judgement of researchers and the idea that dads are more playful could stem from observer bias
— we don’t have a clear explanation as to why dads can’t form primary attachments it may be gender stereotypes or it may be that oestrogen is linked to being more nurturing
– there is a lack of consistency in the research
different research states different things about the roles of a father as they all researching different things; some look at the role as a secondary attachment figure and some as a primary
secondary - distinct rule, playing and simulations
primary - they can take on a more maternal role
+ practical IRL application
Paternity/maternity leave
Custody of children: Men gaining more equality in this
Role modeling parental skills in young men
– children turn out the same whether they are from homo or heterosexual parents
Grossman suggests that fathers have an important and distinctive role in their Childs development BUT if this was true then there would be a difference so whether they have a distinctive role or not is unanswered
+ HOWEVER, fathers may in fact take on a distinctive role in 2 parent hetero families but single mothers/lesbian families just adapt to take on more of a father’s role
+ the research can offer support and advice to parents
parents don’t have to worry about following social norms because there’s proof that either can be the primary caregiver and it will work out
so parental anxiety can be reduced and lesbian/gay parents don’t have to worry because there is evidence of adaptation both ways
define imprinting
a form of irreversible attachment where offspring (often seen in birds) follow the first large, moving object they see
outline the experiment done on Imprinting
done by Lorenz
he split a clutch of geese eggs into 2 groups
group 1 stayed with mum, hatched in her presence and followed her around as they had imprinted on her
group 2 hatched in an incubator, they followed around Lorenz as they imprinted on him
he then put them in a box together and they reliably segregated to either their mum or Lorenz according to who they were exposed to first
it showed that there must be a critical period in the development of the brain and behaviour; Lorenz found it to be around 0-32 hrs in ducks by varying the time between birth and seeing the first moving object
the experiment showed how young imprints can affect later life; their mating habits were affected, they need to reproduce to continue their genes but they tried mating with Lorenz’ wellies
discuss the idea of a sensitive period and any supporting evidence
Sluckin isolated a duckling for 5 days, which is past the critical period, and found that it was still possible for the duckling to be imprinted
they then thought that it could be a sensitive period rather than critical period
sensitive period - best time for attachments to occur, but not the only time as they can still occur after
vs critical period - only time for attachments to occur
why do animals imprint
- foraging for food
- escape from predators, for protection
- reproduction of the species; they’re given a model of their species and who to mate with
what research learnt about the nature of the bond
Harlow
reared rhesus monkeys with 2 surrogate mothers from birth
1. wire mother producing milk
2. cloth covered mother
if the biological approach was 100% right the monkeys would stay with the wire mother but harlow found them clinging to the cloth mother most of the time even though it couldn’t feed them
this suggested that monkeys need contact comfort
what was learnt about the importance of forming attachments
Harlow found he could introduce monkeys to the colony after 3 months, it was part of the sensitive period and they were usually accepted and able to adapt well
But with a delay over 6 months the monkeys were severely withdrawn or violent, the found it difficult to mate and females didn’t know how to care for any offspring they produced and no one cared for the offspring either
he concluded that maternal deprivation in all primates leads to later distorted development
outline the study about love in infant rhesus monkeys
the strange situation
harlow left the monkey in a room with toys and one mother
cloth mother: ran to mother, was comforted, had the courage to explore
wire mother: huddled in a frozen state of terror, away from the mother
he placed a scary toy in front of the baby monkey, it was loud with big teeth and loving parts and the baby repeatedly went to the cloth over the wire mother after seeing it
after going ti the mother it began to try and confront the scary toy
so the monkey did love its mother bc it went to it when scared and felt comofrted
evaluate animal studies in attachment
+ they have taught us about critical/sensitive periods
the monkey that formed no attachments over 6 months struggled when it was released, it couldn’t mate and couldn’t care for any offspring if they were produced as it was never taught through seeing it
+ IRL application, eg in post-natal depression
medical professionals are aware of it and can intervene earlier to help the formations of an attachment
depression can leave the mother feeling numb and unable to form a bond but now that we know the consequences if no bond we can intervene to help the formations of an attachment
+- can the data be extrapolated?
we can experiment in monkeys because they aren’t too similar to us but how can they also be similar enough to produce data that can be generalised to humans, they must also be able to experience similar pains and anxiety
+ animal studies prevent us harming young children who we are certain experience the same levels of pain and anxiety
how can attachments be explained
classical and operant conditioning
babies learn to associate the feeder with the comfort of being fed; the attachment is learned when the infant is happy and comforted when the primary caregiver is present
the baby learns because it’s behaviours are positively reinforced; crying gives them milk, smiling gives them attention
the caregiver learns through negative reinforcement; unpleasant crying leads them to feed/comfort the baby as it removes the crying
what is the secondary drive hypothesis
the primary drive is something the infant biologically needs to survive, eg. food
the secondary drive is a stimulus that reinforces everything after being associated with the primary drive, eg. emotional closeness from PCG
the attachment begins when the infant starts looking for the secondary drive instead of the primary drive
evaluate the behaviourist explanation of attachment
+ scientifically reliable explanation
it seems highly likely that simple association between the provision of needs essential for survival and the person providing those needs can lead to strong attachments
– contradictory evidence
Harlow found monkeys to attach to the cloth mother even though it didn’t provide food and satisfy the monko’s needs; so classical conditioning doesn’t explain attachment formation in infant monkeys as they aren’t linking the food with pleasure
+ BUT maybe to monkeys, clinging is more important than food because in the wild they would have to cling to their mother to survive so classical conditioning could still explain it
– the air blast experiment
halo made the cloth mother blast cold air out when the baby hugged it that flung the monkey but the baby still went back to cling to it’s mother
– Schaffer and Emerson found quality > quantity
learning theories use a quantity explanation based on repeated associations but there’s evidence of over 50% of infants getting attached to a person that isn’t doing the most feeding, nappy changing etc.
what are the types of observations
- controlled
- naturalistic
- covert
- overt
- participant
- non-participant
- direct
- indirect
describe and evaluate a controlled observation
Watching and recording behaviour in a structured environment e.g. lab setting
+ high control of extraneous variables, making results less valid
– low ecological validity
describe and evaluate a naturalistic observation
watching and recording behaviors in a natural situation i.e. don’t create conditions
+ high ecological validity
– low control of extraneous variables, making results less valid
describe and evaluate a covert observation
participants are unaware of their behaviour being watched and recorded
+ high ecological validity because of natural behaviour
– ethical issues from a lack of informed consent