topic 2- educational policies Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

what education act brought about the tripartite system

A

the 1944 butler education act

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

what idea was the 1944 education act shaped by

A

meritocracy- the idea that people should achieve their status and status should not be ascribed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what idea did the 1944 butler education act enrich

A

the idea that that every child should be given an equal opportunity to develop his/her talents within a free system of state education

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what was the tripartite system

A

when children were were selected and allocated to one of three different schools according to their abilities

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

what was the tripartite system designed to provide

A

equal but separate schooling

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

what were the three schools in the tripartite system emphasised to have

A

parity of esteem

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

how were the abilities and aptitudes of children identified

A

by the 11+ exam

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

what were the three schools in the tripartite system

A

1) secondary grammar schools
2) secondary modern schools
3) technical schools

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

what were secondary grammar schools (3)

A
  • for pupils who passed the 11+ exam
  • mainly middle class pupils
  • offered an academic curriculum which provided access to non-manual jobs
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

what curriculum did the secondary grammar schools offer

A

an academic curriculum

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

what were secondary modern schools (3)

A
  • offered a non-academic practical curriculum and access to manual jobs
  • mainly for working class pupils
  • for pupils who failed the 11+
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

what was bad about the tripartite system (4)

A
  • in reality schools did not have parity of esteem- grammar schools were seen as the best schools
  • reproduced class inequality and was socially divisive as middle class students went to grammar schools
  • reproduced gender inequality as girls had to achieve a higher mark to go to a grammar school
  • the school you go to may limit your career choices
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

which group of sociologists critique the tripartite system

A

marxists- as class inequalities are reproduced

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

when were LEAs instructed to convert to a comprehensive system of schooling

A

in 1965

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

what was the comprehensive system designed to do (2)

A
  • overcome the class divide of the tripartite system and make education and society more meritocratic and egalitarian
  • it emphasised integration and inclusion
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

how did the comprehensive system work- what schools did pupils go to

A

-all pupils within the same catchment are would attend the same mixed ability school

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

what was a drawback of the comprehensive system (LEAs) - (2)

A
  • it was left to the LEA to decide whether to go comprehensive and not all did
  • therefore, some grammar schools still existed and so middle class students went there and working class students went to comprehensive schools
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

what was good about the comprehensive system (2)

A
  • all pupils were given access to the same schools, resources and curriculum
  • everyone was given the same chances to flourish and do well as they followed the same curriculum
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

what do critics argue about the comprehensive system (3)

A
  • pupils were still segregated as pupils were put into different sets and bands
  • different classes may therefore follow a different curriculum according to ability
  • some schools were still ranked and seen as supreme
  • some grammar schools still existed
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

what were the first labour policies influenced by

A

new right

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

what were the first labour policies that were influenced by new right aimed to do

A

promote diversity, competition and choice

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

labour policies (NR) - 2006 policies (name it and describe it)

A

-the 2006 education and inspections act- gave schools greater freedom to be selective by setting their own admission arrangements

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

labour policies (NR)- failing schools

  • the programme introduced
  • key objective
A
  • failing schools, often in low-income areas were closed because they failed to meet targets.
  • as part of a ‘fresh start programme (2001), they were re-opened as city academies
  • the key objective was to improve educational standards
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

labour policies (NR)- 2006 additional table based on social factors (4)

A
  • labour accepted that competition between schools would raise standards
  • and they retained league tables
  • 2006 introduced an additional table based on social factors
  • schools in low-income areas with average exam results might score highly because their results are better than expected
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

labour policies (NR)- 1998 teaching and higher education act

A

-labour introduced tuition fees for undergraduates and postgraduates

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

labour policies (reducing inequality)- the new deal 1998

A

for young people aimed to help the young unemployed gain qualifications to improve their chances of finding work

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

labour policies (reducing inequality)- the aim higher initiative 2004

A

-aimed to widen participation in higher education particularly among students from low-income backgrounds

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

labour policies (reducing inequality)- raising the school leaving age in 2008

A

-raised to 17 (then 18 in 2015) was designed to reduce to number of neets

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
29
Q

labour policies (reducing inequality)- education action zones 1997

A

-in 1997 some disadvantaged communities were identified and designated Education Action Zones (EAZ) providing additional resources and funding

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
30
Q

explain why critics argue that labour’s policy attempts to get more working-class students into uni was contradictory

A

-because labour introduced uni fees and working-class students will not be able to afford it

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
31
Q

what were coalition gov policies influenced by

A

new right ideas about reducing the role of the state in education through marketisation and privatisation

32
Q

what were academies encouraged to do from 2010

A

-to leave LEA control and to become academies

33
Q

what are academies

A

-publicly funded, independent schools

34
Q

3 things that academies could do

A
  • freedom from local authority control
  • ability to set own pay and conditions for staff
  • freedoms around the delivery of the curriculum
35
Q

what could academies benefit from

A

-greater freedoms to invoate and raise standards

36
Q

how do academies get their funding

A
  • from the Education Funding Agency rather than from local authorities
  • the school has power over how the money should be spent
37
Q

what was bad about academies

A

-schools didn’t focus on reducing inequality as the budget as used to benefit students

38
Q

what are free-schools

A

-all- ability, state funded schools set up in response to what local people say they want and need in order to improve education for children

39
Q

what are teachers, parents and others able to do through the free schools programme

A

open schools to address real demand within an area (those people did not need an educational qualification to work there e.g. teachers

40
Q

what do supports of free schools say (2)

A
  • that it gives parents and teachers the opportunity to create a new school if they are unhappy with the state schools in their area
  • they also argue that they improve educational standards by taking control away from the state and giving power to parents
41
Q

what does Allen argue about free schools (criticises the idea) (2)

A
  • it only benefits children from highly educated families
  • free-schools are socially divisive and that they lower standards (they take fewer disadvantaged pupils than nearby schools)
42
Q

what does Ball argue about promoting academies and free-schools (2)

A
  • it has led to fragmentation which has led to greater inequality of educational opportunity
  • it has led to centralisation of control: central gov has increased its power over education and has reduced the role of LEAs
43
Q

what are the 5 things that the coalition gov introduced

A
  • e-bac
  • a-levels
  • vocational subjects being stripped off
  • academies
  • free-schools
44
Q

what is E-bac

A

-it is awarded to pupils who achieve GCSEs in english, maths, foreign language and a humanity at grade C or above

45
Q

what E-bac designed to ensure

A

that all pupils have the opportunity to study a broad core of subjects ensuring that all doors are not closed in terms of future progression e.g. if they want to go uni

46
Q

what was the coalition government’s policy on vocational subjects (2)

A
  • in january 2012, vocational subjects were to be stripped from school league tables
  • therefore, schools were made to drop valuable, technical, practical, work-related courses or risk getting no credit for the provision
47
Q

what did Gove change about A-levels

A

that it must be taken as a linear two year course, with exams at the end of the two year period

48
Q

what new thing did Gove introduce with A-levels

A

new league tables giving special credit to students who get AAB in facilitating subjects

49
Q

what two policies did the coalition gov introduce to reduce inequality

A
  • free school means for all pupils in KS1- you did not have to prove eligibility
  • pupil premium- where schools receive funding for each pupil who comes from a disadvantaged background
50
Q

what is marketisation

A

the process of introducing market forces of consumer choice and competition into education

51
Q

what has marketisation created

A

an education market by reducing direct state control over education and increasing both competition between schools and parentocracy

52
Q

what gov policy introduced marketisation

A

the 1988 Education Reform Act introduced by the conservative gov

53
Q

give examples of the policies introduced by the 1988 ERA (5)

A
  • national curriculum
  • testing and attainment targets (SATs)
  • league tables and ofsted reports
  • parental choice
  • funding formula
54
Q

what was the national curriculum designed to ensure

A

that schools and pupils concentrate on what they saw as core and foundational subjects- schools had to follow what the gov stated in the NC

55
Q

what was testing and attainment targets introduced to ensure

A

that targets were being met and maintained e.g. through SATs

56
Q

what was league tables and ofsted reports designed to ensure

A
  • schools were ranked according to exam results

- this allowed parents to see what schools wee best or their chilred

57
Q

what was funding formula

-what did this encourage schools to do

A
  • when schools were given money for each pupil that went to their schools
  • this is why schools were encouraged to to recruit pupils up to their maximum capacity
58
Q

what did Lawton argue about the national curriculum in terms of power

A

that it undermined the democratic control of education and the independence of teachers by centralising power to the gov

59
Q

what did Lawton argue about the national curriculum in terms of the NC itself
(how did he describe the NC)

A
  • it was very traditional and unimaginative

- it excluded certain subjects such as politics

60
Q

what did Johnson argue about the NC

A

-that it defined certain types of knowledge worthy of study while excluding other subjects

61
Q

what did Johnson argue about a single curriculum for all pupils

A

-the use of a single curriculum for all pupils based on a common culture did not encourage equality of opportunity

62
Q

what did McNEIL argue that the NC reflect

A

white anglo-saxon culture and it ignored the culture of other ethnic minorities

63
Q

what do critics argue about SATs (2)

A
  • that it has turned education into a rat race- it is about competition and not learning as children want to get into the best secondary schools
  • also that frequent formal testing at such a young age can lead to labelling
64
Q

what do critics argue about league tables for parents (2)

A
  • that it gives parents a misleading impression of the quality of a school
  • league tables conceal under-performing schools that may work hard to improve the educational standards. However, due to a lack of funding they may not be able to become better in terms of results
65
Q

what do critics argue about league tables for poorer schools

A

that it is harder for poorer schools to improve as pupils may go to schools with good results and so the poorer schools will receive less funds as they have less pupils

66
Q

what does Bartlett et al argue that that league tables encourage schools to participate in (2)

A
  • cream-skimming: good schools an be more selective, choosing their own customers and recruiting high achieving, mainly middle class pupils
  • silt-shifting: good schools can avoid taking less able students who are likely to get poor results and damage the schools league table position
67
Q

funding formula- what is happens to popular schools (3)

A
  • they gain more funds as they are able to attract a lot of customers
  • they can afford better qualified teachers and better facilities
  • their popularity allows them to be more selective and attract more able, mainly working class students
68
Q

funding formula- what happens to unpopular schools

A
  • they lose income as they are not able to attract a lot of customers
  • they find it difficult to match the teacher skills and facilities of more successful rivals/schools
69
Q

funding formula- what did the international study of patterns in educational inequality find out

A

that competition-orientated education systems produce more segregation between children of different social backgrounds

70
Q

what did Ball and Gewirtz argue that schools are now focused on

A

schools are more focused on attracting the best pupils rather than improving educational standards

71
Q

parental choice- what did the increased emphasis on testing and competition between schools do

A

it undermined the principles of comprehensive schooling and represented a move back to the era of the tripartite system

72
Q

parental choice- what did critics argue that giving power to parents on what schools to choose, led to

A

it led to increased segregation between working and middle class pupils as middle class parents were in a stronger position to choose schools with a good academic record

73
Q

what are the 3 types of parents- identified by Ball and Gewirtz

A
  • privileged- skilled choosers
  • disconnected- local choosers
  • semi-skilled choosers
74
Q

what are privileged skilled choosers (3)

A
  • professional middle class parents who can exploit the new market place in education more effectively than working class parents
  • they can use their economic and cultural capital to ensure that their children go tot he school of their choice
  • they can read ofsted reports, look at league tables etc
75
Q

what are disconnected-local choosers (2)

A
  • working class parents whose choices are restricted by their lack of cultural and economic capital
  • they may not be able to manipulate the education system to their advantage
76
Q

what are semi-skilled choosers (2)

A
  • mainly working class parents, but compared to disconnected-local choosers they are more ambitious for their children
  • however, they too lack economic and cultural capital and so find it difficult to understand the education market
77
Q

what do Ball and Gewirtz argue about parentocracy

A

that it is a myth; middle class parents possess cultural and economic capital and have more choice than working class parents