Topic 2 Flashcards

1
Q

why was ACL only partially recognized historically

A

for the purposes of control

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

did the interim constitution provide directly for recognition of customary law

A

NO - its exact status was unclear

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what did the constitutional principles which guided the final constitution required the final constitution to recognize

A

recognize indigenous law like common law and guarantee the application of customary law in the courts , subject to the constitution and legislation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what did the epilogue of the interim constitution contain reference to that was subsequently removed from the final constitution

A

ubuntu but S v Makwanyane confirmed it as a constitutional values

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

what were references to indigenous law replaces with in the final constitution

A

customary law

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

what sections protect customary law in the final constitution

A

S30, 31 and S211 (3)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is recognition of ACL subject to in the constitution

A

S39 (2)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

what are 3 approaches courts take to recognition

A
  1. non-recognition
  2. recognition of ACL subject to constitution
  3. Recognition and exempt from the constitution
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

in what ways do we see the subjection of indigenous law to the constitution

A

The Constitution can either be applied directly or indirectly

The courts can develop or uphold indigenous law

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

what are the two interpretations of the courts approach that himonga and bosch offer

A
  1. strong interpretation

2. second interpretation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

what is the himonga and bosch strong interpretation

A

Declare law / conduct inconsistent with the Constitution and invalid to the extent of inconsistency. So, in developing the law, courts strike down a rule

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

what is the himonga and bosch second interpretation

A

Adapt a rule of indigenous law to bring it in conformity with the spirit, purport and objects of the Constitution’s Bill of Rights (BoR)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

what are the two interpretations lehnert offers of courts power to develop ACL

A

Active and Passive

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Lehnert active development

A

Create a new rule: either by re-formulating existing indigenous law or formulating altogether a new rule

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Lehnert passive development

A

Look at current practices of people and recognise them as binding rules

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly