Conflict of Laws Flashcards

1
Q

what is lex fori

A

the law of the forum; the law of the court hearing and disposing of an action

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

lex causae

A

the law of the cause; where there is a conflict of laws , the law which has precedence to dispose of the action

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

lex loci celebrationis

A

the law of the place where marriage is celebrated

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what are the two situations where conflicts can arise

A
  1. private international law

2. personal or internal conflict of laws

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

when does a personal or internal conflict of laws arise

A

different legal systems operating within a single national legal system

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

did conflict laws exist in precolonial times

A

yes , a false impression is created that it is a foreign concept introduced from people outside of Africa

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

In precolonial times where did conflicts of law arise

A

precolonial Africa had kingdoms which applied different legal systems, conflicts of law could arise between people from different jurisdictions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

what imefecane or difaqane

A

social upheavals caused by wars among the African communities of SA by the end of the second decade of the nineteenth century. These lead to the emergence and consolidation of new nations.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Under S1 (3) of LEAA what must the courts first do

A

must first make a finding as to whether the parties agreed expressly or tacitly as to the version to be applied in judicial proceedings

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Under S1 (3) of LEAA what happens if the parties made an express agreement about which law to apply

A

the courts must simply implement the agreement because people have a freedom to choose a legal system (protected by the right to culture)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Under S1 (3) of the LEAA what happens if the agreement between the parties to apply law is tacit

A

the court will impute the terms of agreement to the party taking into account

  1. prior conduct
  2. cultural background
  3. nature of the transaction
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Under S1 (3) of the LEAA what happens if there is an absence of agreement between the parties as to what law applies

A

the court will apply the customary law that applies to the place where the defendant resides or works if such if the only prevailing law

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Under S1 (3) of the LEAA, what happens if there is an absence of agreement but there are more than 1 version of customary law at the place where the defendant resides

A

The court applies the first mentioned version

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Under the BAA what system of law was used

A

customary law applied only to black people and all transactions involving other races were dealt with according to the common law

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

what replaced the BAA

A

the LEAA

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Is S1 (1) a law of conflicts rule?

A

Bennet says no but he regards the repugnancy clause bit to

17
Q

Is S1 (1) a law of conflicts rule?

A

Bennet says no but he regards the repugnancy clause bit to be

18
Q

in this situation is the repugnancy clause applied as a conflict of law rule:
In Case C , customary law rule X conflicts with the common law rule Y. The court finds X to be repugnant and strikes it down. The court then applies rule Y to the case.

A

yes

19
Q

In this situation is the repugnancy clause applied as a conflict of law rule:
`in case C , customary law X conflicts with common law rule Y. After the court has consulted the conflict of law rules and the parties agreement, the court decides rule X is applicable. If the court finds rule X to be repugnant and strikes it down, it does not apply rule Y to the case.

A

NO

20
Q

In Mabuza v Mbatha what did the court argue was the correct test for for the validity of customary law

A

the constitution and not the repugnancy clause

21
Q

Is S211 (3) a conflict of law rule

A

yes

22
Q

Although S211 (3) does not tell us how to resolve conflicts, what mechanism can we use to do so when determining conflicts between customary law and customary law

A

S1 (3) of the LEAA

23
Q

what factors can be used to determine conflicts between common law and customary law

A
  1. agreement and intention
  2. nature of the transaction
  3. subject matter of the transaction
  4. lifestyle of the parties
  5. exemption from customary law
  6. marriage by christian rites
  7. testate or intestate succession
24
Q

explain the factor of “agreement and intention”

A

parties to a contract can agree which legal system will regulate their contractual rights and duties

25
Q

explain “nature and environment of the transaction”

A

focuses on the cultural environment in which the transaction took place regardless of factors such as race and wealth. The form and nature are dealt with as one.

26
Q

explain “the lifestyle of the parties”

A

looks at whether the people abided by customary law , mostly used in delictual claims

27
Q

explain “exemption from customary law”

A

this rule has no place in a constitutional dispensation - old rule where natives could prove they were civilised enough to have common law and not customary law apply