Topic 17 Moral Ignorance Flashcards

1
Q

What is moral ignorance?

A
  • not knowing/understanding difference between right + wrong
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Why might someone be morally ignorant?

A
  • never been taught right from wrong / lack capacity to understand difference between right / wrong
  • potentially haven’t educated themselves
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What does Christianity teach about moral ignorance?

A
  • everyone has capacity to distinguish right from wrong
  • most of the time, ignorance not a valid excuse for doing wrong
  • COUNTER ARGUMENT - jesus did say ‘father forgive them for they know not what they do’ (Luke 23)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What did aquinas believe about moral ignorance (religious)?

A
  • human beings = rational -> want to do good
  • can sometimes use rationality wrongly to think that something is right when actually morally wrong (eg lie to someone to make them feel better)
  • when you use your reason wrongly because sometimes not fully informed
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What are some examples of aquinas’ belief about moral ignorance (mistaking apparent good for real good)

A
  1. Euthanasia
    - relieves suffering but (according to aquinas) primary precept = preserve life (so it is apparent good not real good)
  2. buy cheap things
    - can get more for family -> make them happy
    - things made by exploiting others - apparent good not real good
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What would non Christians say about moral ignorance?

A
  • important that people learn right + wrong

- society expects that parents + schools play a part in encouraging correct moral conduct

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What would hard determinists (everything in your life already determined) argue?

A
  • don’t have any free will at ALL
  • everything we do determined by variety of factors
  • SO we don’t have any freedom to choose what we do + thus have any moral responsibility

EG in case of Leopold + Loeb

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Describe the case of Leopold + Loeb

A
  • graduates 18-19 from uni of Chicago
  • kidnapped 14 yr old boy - Loeb hit + gagged boy
  • made ransom demands to his family
  • boys body found and teenagers arrested (they confessed their guilt)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Describe why their sentence was reduced

A
  • death penalty was demanded
  • BUT attorney Clarence Darrow (determinist) said that ‘to believe any boy is responsible for himself or his early training is an absurdity’
  • argued that boys had difficult upbringings
  • abusive parents + no good moral instruction
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What do many non Christians believe about moral ignorance?

A
  • unstable moral grounding -> person cannot be blamed for actions
  • especially if they believe they are doing right thing
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What does Michael Zimmerman believe? (Non religious)

A
  • argues that in actions done through moral ignorance, person culpable for it if her is culpable for ignorance that lead him to act in such a way

Eg Edlington brothers

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Describe the Edlington attacks

A

2009 - brutal robbery + torture of two young boys, by two brothers aged 10 and 11

  • both initially charged with attempted murder + robbery of both boys
  • Sheffield crown court - hearing revealed that there was sexual abuse + strangulation + stoning + burning
  • both pleaded guilty to causing grievous bodily harm with intent, robbery and forced sexual activity + more
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What sentence was given to the brothers?

A

Indeterminate

Toxic family background etc.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

How does Luke 23 inform the Christian view on ignorance human wrongdoing?

A
  • ‘father forgive them for they know no what they do’ - people who killed Jesus
  • suggests that human moral ignorance = cause of Jesus’ death
  • thus believe that ignorance is root of much human wrongdoing
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

How does Aquinas’ argument enforce to Christians that ignorance is a root of human wrong doing?

A
  • reason we do wrong = misunderstanding of natural law + misuse of rationality to work out what is morally right + wrong
  • leads to apparent goods + real goods (moral actions deriving from the natural law)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

How does peter 1;14, for fundamentalists, show that ignorance = root cause of human wrong doing?

A

‘As obedient children, do not conform to the evil desires you had when you lived in ignorance’

  • fundamentalist interpret this as if you are not Christian (ignorant) more likely to be swayed into doing evil
  • this ignorance is root cause of human wrongdoing
17
Q

What are some non religious views on moral ignorance as root cause of human wrongdoing?

A
  1. Many crimes occur due to moral ignorance (Edlington brothers)
  2. Society more fragmented -> moral upbringing in different places = different , children not always being taught right from wrong, greater surge of actions that hurt others
  3. Psychological conditions -> unaware of what morally right / wrong is -> incapacity to understand -> bad things (kleptomania - stealing addiction)
18
Q

Why would some non religious people argue that moral ignorance isn’t the root cause of human wrong doing?

A
  • no excuse

- people claim moral ignorance to cover up bad actions made on own terms