Topic 1 (Part 1) - Organisations and Movements Flashcards
1
Q
Church
A
- TROELTSCH
- Large organisations often with millions of members, e.g., Catholic Church
- Monopoly of truth (WALLIS) = know the correct way to live, this is exclusive
- Generally run by a bureaucratic leadership team, e.g., professional priests
- Headed by the sovereign state, e.g., the Queen
- Universalistic = appeal to whole society
2
Q
A03 Church
A
- Due to their organisational structure, they generally appeal to the middle class = prefer conservative means of living = maintains status quo rather than challenge it
3
Q
Sects
A
- TROELTSCH
- Small, exclusive groups
- Claim to have monopoly of truth
- Run by small-scale charismatic leadership (someone who is convincing can appeal to those who are lost)
- Appeals to marginalised groups who are facing disprivilege in their lives = offer salvation
- Challenge status quo
4
Q
Denominations
A
- NIEBUHR
- Midway between Churches and Sects = Methodism
- Tolerant of other religious group’s beliefs = inclusive and pluralistic in nature = status quo challenged
- Run by similar bureaucratic leadership to that of a church, hierarchy of leadership, but not as complex
- Broad appeal e.g., banning alcohol
- Membership is not exclusive
5
Q
Cults
A
- NIEBUHR
- Very small scale organisations (highly individualistic)
- Tolerant of other religious beliefs = approved by postmodernist
- Specific capabilities to be able to improve life on earth = likely to appeal to those marginalised and require salvation
- Not bureaucratic but run by “practitioners” or “therapists”
- Special knowledge, e.g., scientology
- Appeal to small scale groups with similar interests
6
Q
A03 Is it really a clear cut?
A
- BRUCE argues trying to categorise religious organisations is not a clear cut
- E.g., BRUCE says that the Church is now a Denomination as it is no longer universalistic
7
Q
A03 Church attendance
A
- DAVIE argues that religion is not declining and church attendance figures are not evidence to suggest secularisation is taking place
- Instead she argues that people still hold religious views but are more privatised with their beliefs
- “Believing without belonging”
8
Q
New Religious Movements (NRM’s)
A
- WALLIS
1. World Rejecting Groups
2. World Accommodating Groups
3. World Affirming Groups
9
Q
World Rejecting NRMS
A
- WALLIS
- Similar to Sects in that they claim to have a monopoly of truth = seen as deviant by rest of society
- E.g., The Children of God
- A definite notion of what God is
- Highly critical of the outside world, and challenge the status quo (exclusive)
- Salvation = sharp break from their former lives
- Restricted contact with outside world, and live communally
10
Q
A03 World Rejecting NRMS
A
- “Brainwashing” criticisms from the outside world
11
Q
World Accommodating NRMS
A
- WALLIS
- Breakaway organisation from mainstream organisations e.g., the Church, beliefs vary slightly
- Seek to restore purity of which the main organisation failed to satisfy
- E.g., Neo-Pentecostalists (more spiritualism than Catholicism)
- Respectable, not deviant
- Similar to denominations
- Maintains status quo
- Conventional lives lead
12
Q
World Affirming NRMS
A
- WALLIS
- Lack characteristics of a traditional religion (structure, “one” metaphysical being)
- Not organised into a bureaucratic structure, having a “looser” command structure than traditional religions
- E.G., Scientology
- Promise followers success in the world (careers and relationships) = “psychologising religion”
- Inclusive and tolerant of other religious groups
- Most are cults (members as customers)
- Appeal to wealthy groups
13
Q
Comparison of NRMS
A
- World Affirming NRMS are the most successful of the groups WALLIS studied, e.g., scientology has 165,000 members in the UK compared to 1,200 Moonies (World Rejecting)
14
Q
A03 NRMS
A
- Ignores diversity within NRM
- WALLIS recognises that rarely fit into 1 type, some have features of all 3
- STARK and BAINBRIDGE categorising is too simplistic, as these have too many similarities with the main 4, e.g., Scientology is both a Cult and World Affirming
15
Q
Two organisations in conflict with society
A
- STARK and BAINBRIDGE
1. Sects
2. Cults
16
Q
Sects - STARK and BAINBRIDGE
A
- Result of a disagreement (schism) with a mainstream organisation e.g., Church
- Members begin to feel “ethically deprived” and feel the religious organisation is not correct in its ethical code = disagreement with doctrine
17
Q
A03 Sects (S&B)
A
- LENIN, STARK and BAINBRIDGE acknowledge that sects are much like an ideological apparatus in Marxism, when subordinated individuals beginning to feel an element of alienation
18
Q
Cults - STARK and BAINBRIDGE
A
- Cults develop to offer “this worldly” benefits such as better help, or peach of mind (prevent anomie/cure it)
- “Psychic deprivation”
- Other benefits which cults attempt to remedy are economic deprivation, as it is “this worldly benefit”, attempt to remedy organismic deprivation or ill health