To What Extent Was Germany Responsible For The Outbreak Of The First World War 1914? Flashcards
Intriduction
Responsibility for outbreak of First World War controversial. Article 231 of treaty of Versailles blames Germany.
Opinions: Fischers was result of aggression. David Loyd George “slithered over the brink into the boiling could ten of war”. (Aggression, alliances).
What Is The Acronym?
HAIGE (Hungry-Austria, Alliances, Individuals, Germany, Everyone)
Germany’s Aggression
Weltpolitik. Flottenpolitik. Support for Austria. 1912 War Council. Kurt Reizlers Diaries.
Weltpolitik
Seen as far back as Bulow (1897-1900). Expressed by Moroccan crises in 1995 and 1911. Crises highlights features of Weltpolitik as only small bits of land acquired (I.e. Two small strips of the Congo).
HIGHLIGHT INDIVIDUAL ROLES AS ALTHOUGH POLICY NOT PUBLICALLY OPPOSED, NOR WAS IT PUSHED (SO COULD BE INDIVIDUAL AGGRESSION).
Flottenpolitik
Tirpitz naval laws (1898, 1900, 1906). Competing with British navy (I.e. 1996 naval law in response to release of HMS Dreadnought.
NAVAL RACE MAY NOT HAVE BEEN RACE, BRITAIN MAY HAVE BEEN WINNERS ALL ALONG. CAN BE ARGUED AS INDIVIDUAL AGGRESSION, NO PUSH BY PEOPLE.
Support For Austria
Blank cheque issued 5th July 1914 (indirectly highly aggressive). CAN BE ARGUED IT WAS THE AGGRESSION.
Fischer argued Germany hoped this would lead to war.
1912 War Council
Controversy over whether indicates plan or precaution for or incase if war. Fischer in ‘war of illusions’ believed it showed aim for war by Germany.
HISTORIANS BELIEVE IT WAS TO DISCUSS OUTCOMES OF WAR AND PREPARE FOR WORST. CAN ARGUE ROLE OF INDIVIDUALS.
Kurt Riezlers Diaries
Private sec to Bethmann-Hollweg. Annexation plans for what was thought to become peace talks (9th September 1914). Fischer bases evidence off these arguing plans can’t come from nowhere and must have been thought of pre war
MAY NOT HAVE BEEN THOUGHT PRE WAR OR JUST ALTERED. POTENTIAL TAMPERING WITH RIEZLER DIARIES
The Role Of Individuals In Germany
The Kaiser. Opposition Parties. The army. Nationalist pressure groups. Bethmann-Hollweg. Schlieffen Plan.
The Kaiser
Was in charge of all policy. Military minded man who turned to them for advice. Had chance to stop but didn’t.
ARGUED THAT GERMANY SITUATION LEFT NO CHOICE BUT TO PUT ATTENTION TO FOREIGN POLICY.
Opposition Parties
I.e. SPD leader August Bebel. Argued parties placed strain onto political system leaving Kaiser etc, have no choice but to distract public using f.p.
OTHER POSSIBILITIES THAN FOREIGN POLICY FOCUS (I.E. MORE REFORMS TO SETTLE TENSIONS).
The Army
Namely Tirpitz (Moltke too). Had personally aggressive aims. Naval laws in 1898, 1900 and 1906 are examples. More powerful than the moderate politician of that time.
Nationalist Pressure Groups
Pushed for aggressive expansion. Pushed those in power to f.p.
NOT INCREDIBLY LARGE OR POWERFUL.
Bethmann-Hollweg
Fischer placed him at centre using Kurt Riezlers diaries.
POSSIBLE TAMPERING WITH DIARIES. 29th JULY 1914 BETHMANN URGED AUSTRIA TO NEGOTIATE WITH RUSSIA. BETHMANN NOT INVITED TO 1912 WAR COUNCIL AND DIDNT ADVOCATE WAR PUBLICALLY.
Schlieffen Plan
Field marshal from 1891-1905. Blitzkrieg war to capture France then move to east and Russia. Aggressive plan which included annexation. Would drag Russia into war.
NOT JUST HIS PLAN, WAS AGREED UPON