THERMIDORIANS Flashcards
(88 cards)
what were the problems that the thermidorians were facing
- lack legitimacy and lack a mandate - not democratically elected - power by coup
- excess radical / jacobin sentiment
- france is extremely factionalised (difficult to pose as a uniting force)
- lack of clear leadership in france
- the war is still continuing - feel that there are internal and external threats
- politics is too reliant on violence
what were the priorities of the thermidorians after rob is executed
- reunifying france and reduce political polarization
- restore religion
- recentre france
- removing this reliance on violence and terror as a mechanism for conformity and order
- make power less centralised and increase provincial power
- bring back french economic power and prosperity
- ensure that power is not entrenched with a minimal number of people
- break SC power
- dissolve radicalism
describe the white terror (starts around 14th feb 1795, ends around october 1795)
- period of terror officials being beaten by chouan rebels (carrier, billaud, callot)
- the parisian and thermidorian government lack decisive authority and cannot control provinces
- local leaders use this as an opportunity to seize power, given the therms were weak and not legitimate
- the government was being led by people
key figures of the white terror
- barras
- freron
regional differences in the white terror
some regions had minimal violence:
- rheims
- seine-et-marne = no deaths
some regions had extensive violence:
- lyons
- vendee
- marseille
how did the white terror not bring political stability
- no working justice system
- the inequality and wealth gap is still extremely wide
- bourgeoisie led
- there is no strong legitimate government as decentralisation allowed for expansive provincial power
- the government was being led by the people
- hoche is forced to get rid of 20000 rebels with 140,000 milita (lack of strength + economic burden)
how did the white terror bring political stability
- limits and suppresses power of radicals
- parisian commune is reduced by 31st august
- jacobin club is closed on 12th november
- french association with instability is limited and no effective leadership of radicals - political bridge
- the national guard was happy to work with the convention and were not polarized
- key drivers of terror killed (callot, herbois)
- 31st july = moderates (ie tallien) are appointed to CGS + CPS - economic stability
- people were lavishly spending
- law of maximum repealed on 24th december
germinal uprising and outcome
1st april 1795
- 10,000 SC invaded the convention and demanded ‘bread and a constitution’ due to bad 1795 harvest
- assignats drop to less than 5% of their original value
- bread prices increase from 6 livres in middle of april to 16 livres later
- rationing to only 60g bread a day
*protestors withdrew without resistance when the national guard ordered them to disband
consequence:
- paris = under martial law under pichegru
- montagnard deportations are sped up (billaud-varennes)
- thermidorians break power of SC (due to their lack of leadership)
- sets a precedent for government
prairial revolt and outcome
20-23rd may 1795
- bread rations fell to 2 ounces per head
- there was a fear that because saint-antoine was rising, other districts would rise too
- murder feraud
- demanded release of jacobins, the 1793 constitution and control of supplies
- the national guard support the insurrectionists
- women and men united in this revolt - mobilisation
outcome:
- food commission created
- 20,000 sans culottes proceed to storm in the next day, 40,000 soliders needed to dispel violence
- sans culottes withdrow
- the government forced SC weapons to be conceded
- 42 were executed by government
- 24th may - enforce disarming suspected terrorists
- members of rev committees are arrested
- in september 1795, jacobin suspects are released into prais
vendemiaire rising and outcome
5th october 1795
- royalist uprising against a plebicite for a new constitution which was rigged
- discontent over the 2/3 law, which 47/48 sections opposed
- protesters gather in dreux
- 7 sections declare themselves in insurrection
- these people heavily disliked any republican government
- 25,000 parisians march on convention
- napoleon takes control of 5000-6000 troops
- napoleon is outnumbered 6:1, but fires on the crowd killing 300
outcome:
- 10 sentenced to death
- amplifies the persona of napoleon
- national guard abolished
- get rid of sectional assembly
24th may military commission
1795
- would allow for the trial of execution of people with a badge or who rebel
- over 19 people condemned to death - 6/19 were montagnards
significance of 1795 uprisings
- stability could only be brought with violence - no political authority
- thermidorians rely on opposing political groups to bring stability and counteract one another
- no executive authority
2/3 law
- law claiming that 2/3 of deputies that sat in the assembly before would sit in the new legislature
- 25% of departments oppose
- right wing voters are angry at this law and newspapers release articles against it
council of 500 + role
- men of at least 30
- renewed each year by 1/3 (no entrenched power)
- nominated by electorate
role:
- prepare a list of members for the directory to present to council of elders
- propose and draw up new laws
council of ancients + role
- composed of 250 men
- must be aged over 40
- must be married or a widower
role:
- choose the 5 members of the directly from secret ballot
- examine and approve legislation
executive / directory composition + role
- men at least of 40 years of age
- could not be in the legislature
- appointed by the ancients
- one member was removed annually
role:
- protect french national security
- right to be sent before a police officer in 2 days
- issue proclamations to conform to laws
- warrants of arrest against those plotting against french security
(ie sieyes, carnot, ducos, barras)
strengths of 1795 constitution
- checks and balances / separation of power
- bicameral nature = allows for discussion and power checking power
*strengths are same as weaknesses
ie:
- no entrenched power
- political gridlock fuels discussion etc
representation:
5.5 million/8 million vote for electors (but only if you are in bourgeoisie + over 21) - enfranchisement
weaknesses of 1795 constitution
- lacks consistency
- constant changing of members in the legislature and directory
- doesn’t allow for continuity + laws to be seen through
- high turnover / no stability
- minimal progress
- one person can remain in power for over 5 years = encourages corruption, entrenched power etc
- 1/3 of council elected out annually (interest groups can never express opinion) - lacks representation
- age requirements
- minimal voting of women
- only 1/8 people could vote - mask unpopularity - gridlock
- political paralysis cannot be easily overcome
- only 5 directors - small group, how do you fix disagreements? - not directly elected
- vulnerable to a coup = no legitimacy
(most powerful people w most entrenched power are not directly elected)
- nobody to hold you to account
aims / nature of 1795 constitution
- bicameral legislature with checks and balances
- one and indivisible republic
- sovereignty of france
- limit power of the unelected and army (more power to bourgeoisie)
- increased representation
- no fusion of power
- prevent entrenched and centralised power
- aimed to bring political stability and moderation
- freedom of speech, religion
- pure revolution (no emigres return)
- equality of citizens
- guarantee property
describe the electoral system from 1795
directory:
- members appointed by leg
legislature:
- appointed by electoral assembly
- renewed annually by 2/3rds
electoral assembly:
- elected by primary assembly 1x a year
- must be 25 or above
- must have property valued at 200 days labour (bourgeoisie)
primary assembly:
- elected by french citizens
- 5.5/8 million people can vote here
citizens:
- pay direct tax
- at least 21
- 8 million people
when did the following occur:
1. moderate appointments were made to the CPS + CGS
2. the law of 22 prarial repealed
3. the rev tribunals reduced and then abolished
moderate appointments:
- 31st july 1794 - remove radical revolutionary edge and ensure close enemies do not rise up
law of 22 prairial:
- 1st august
- target radical edge of terror
rev tribunals:
10th august = reduced
may 1795 = abolished
what was the law on revolutionary government
- only one member of a revolutionary committee was allowed per department
- there would be 12 committees in paris
- this would break the power of the CPS who was in charge of war
- the convention would be changed by 25% a year
when did the following occur:
1. when was the paris commune power reduced
2. when was the church and state separated
3. when was the jacobin club closed
paris commuune:
- reduced on 31st august 1794
church and state:
- separated on 18th sept 1794
jacobin club closed:
- closed on the 12th november
when was:
1. the law of suspects abolished
2. the repeal of the law of maximum
law of suspects:
- abolished in october 1795
law of maximum repealed:
- 24th december