theory and methods Flashcards

1
Q

What are the key features of positivism?

A
  • developed by COMTE who believes that society can be explained with principles based on objectivity, reliability and generalisability obtained from quantitative data.
  • The main task of sociology is to discover laws of social development through:
  • laws of co-existence: looking at the relationship between parts of society
  • laws of succession: laws that govern social change
  • It is possible and desirable to apply the logic and methods of the natural sciences to the study of society
  • reality exists outside of the human mind
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is inductive reasoning?

A

Induction involves accumulating data about the world through careful observation and measurement.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is verificationism?

A

The process of confirming a theory through multiple observations.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What are the positivist ideas regarding objective quantitative research?

A
  • Positivists use quantitative data to measure patterns of behaviour and discover laws of cause and effect.
  • They believe sociologists should remain objective and not let their subjective ideas influence the research. They prefer methods which emphasise detachment to collect reliable data.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Explain Durkheim’s study of suicide.

A
  • He studied suicide to try to prove that sociology is a science.
  • He used official statistics and found patterns in the suicide rate eg rates for Protestants were higher than for Catholics.
  • He concluded that the patterns were social facts and claimed to have discovered a ‘real law’; that different levels of integration and regulation cause different rates of suicide.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is the subject matter of sociology according to interpretivists?

A

They say that the subject matter of sociology is meaningful social action. We can only understand it by interpreting the meanings of social actors. Therefore sociology isn’t a science because it only deals with cause and effect and not human meanings.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Explain the interpretivist ideas about verstehen.

A

Rather than focusing on detachment and objectivity, we need to focus on the meanings people give to their actions by focusing on the world from their viewpoint. This is what WEBER calls verstehen ie empathetic understanding to grasp meaning.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What are the two types of interpretivism?

A
  • Interactionists
    We can have causal explanations but they reject the positivist view about having hypotheses. GLASER AND STRAUSS say this is because it risks researchers imposing their own viewpoints rather than taking the actors’ viewpoint. They take a bottom-up approach/grounded theory which means our ideas emerge as we do more observations rather than starting with a fixed hypothesis. These ideas can then form a hypothesis.
  • Phenomenologists and ethnomethodologists
    eg GARFINKEL reject the possibility of causal explanations of human behaviour. They take a radically anti-structuralist view arguing that society isn’t a real thing out there determining our actions.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Explain Douglas’ views about suicide.

A
  • He rejects the positivist views about external social facts determining our behaviour.
  • To understand suicide we need to uncover the meanings for those involved.
  • Rejects Durkheim’s use of official statistics because they are social constructions. He says we should use qualitative data like case studies to investigate suicide.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What are the ideas about postmodernism, feminism and scientific sociology?

A
  • postmodernists reject the idea of scientific sociology because they regard natural science as a meta-narrative.
  • a scientific approach is dangerous because it claims a monopoly of the truth and excludes other points of view like a domination.
  • poststructuralist feminists argue that the quest for a single, scientific feminist theory is a form of domination because it excludes other women.
  • ## science is an undesirable model for sociology to follow because it hasn’t always led to progress and has sometimes has negative impacts.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What did Popper say about the fallacy of induction?

A

We can never prove a theory is true simply by producing more observations that verify it. For example, after observing many swans we may conclude that they are all white. However we can’t prove this, for example one observation of a black swan will disprove this theory.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is falsificationism?

A

The process of proving a theory wrong. Popper says a good theory is one which is falsifiable and makes big generalisations. For a theory to be falsifiable it must be open to criticism from other scientists.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is the difference between open and closed societies?

A

Open societies believe in free expression and the right to challenge accepted ideas. Closed societies are dominated by an official belief system which claims to have the absolute truth. They stifle the growth of science.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Does Popper think sociology is scientific or unscientific?

A

He says it is both
- unscientific because it consists of theories that can’t be put to the test with the possibility that they might be falsified.
- can be scientific because it is capable of producing hypotheses that can be falsified.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What are Kuhn’s ideas regarding paradigms, normal science and scientific revolutions?

A
  • a paradigm is shared by members of a scientific community which defines what their science is. Science can’t exist without it.
  • while the paradigm goes unquestioned, scientists can engage in normal science where they do puzzle solving by finding the solutions to the questions asked by the paradigm.
  • but if the puzzle solving isn’t successful then confidence in the paradigm declines and scientists form rival paradigms which mark the start of a scientific revolution. Eventually one paradigm wins and gets accepted by the scientific community, which resumes normal science but with a new set of assumptions.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Does Kuhn believe sociology is a science?

A

He says sociology could only become a science if it resolves basic disagreements.

17
Q

How do Keat and Urry distinguish between open and closed systems?

A

Open systems are those where the researcher can’t control and measure a,, the relevant variables and so can’t make precise predictions.
Closed systems are those where the researcher can control and measure all the relevant variables and can therefore make precise predictions.

18
Q

What do realists say about underlying structures?

A

They say that it’s natural and social science attempt to explain the causes of events in terms of underlying structures and processes. Although they are i observable, we can work out they exist by observing their effects. This makes sociology scientific.

19
Q

What were the views of the early positivists?

A

COMTE & DURKHEIM believed that the job of sociology was to discover the truth about how society works in order to objectively say what was best for society.

20
Q

What are the views of Karl Marx?

A

He believed his method of historical materialism could reveal the line of development of human society. This development involved evolution which would lead to a classless society. Marx therefore believed that the role of sociology was to reveal the truth of this development, especially to the proletariat who would overthrow capitalism.

21
Q

What are the views of Weber regarding values in research?

A
  1. Values as a guide to research
    Values help to select which aspects of reality to study
  2. Data collection and hypothesis testing
    We must be as objective and unbiased as possible when collecting data.
  3. Values in the interpretation of data
    Our choice of theoretical perspective is influenced by our values.
  4. Values and the sociologist as a citizen
    Sociologists are citizens and they shouldn’t dodge moral and political issues raiswd by their work by being ‘objective’ or ‘value free’.
22
Q

Give two reasons why modern positivists started to disregard values in research

A
  1. The desire to appear scientific - science is concerned with facts not values. Science has high prestige so imitating its methode would raise the subject’s status
  2. The social position of sociology
    GOULDNER: sociologists became spiritless technicians who hired themselves out to organisations to take on and solve their problems for them.
23
Q

What is committed sociology?

A
  • An approach that advocates for openly taking sides by espousing the values and interests of particular individuals or groups.
  • GOULDNER: value free sociology is
  • impossible because values are bound to be reflected in work
  • undesirable because without values sociologists are just selling their services to the highest bidder
  • BECKER: values are always present in sociology but rather than seeing things from the perspective of powerful groups, we should take the side of the underdogs in order to reveal a previously hidden side of social reality.

x Gouldner criticised Becker for taking a romantic and sentimental approach to disadvantaged groups. He says sociologists should take the side of those who are fighting back and be committed to ending their oppression.

24
Q

What is relativism?

A

The idea that different groups, cultures and individuals have different views as to what is true and there is no independent way of judging whether any view is truer than another. It argues there is no absolute truth, just many truths.

25
Q

What is the organic analogy?

A

PARSONS: identifies similarities similarities between society and organisms:
- they are both self regulating systems
- they have needs
- they function to contribute to the systems needs and ensure it’s survival

26
Q

What did Parsons say about value consensus and social order?

A

Social order is achieved through a shared culture and is only possible through value consensus- agreement on the norms and values of society.

27
Q

Describe the two methods of integrating individuls into the social system.

A
  1. Socialisation
    Internalising the norms and values of society. eg family, education, media
  2. Social control
    positive rewards for conformity and negative consequences for deviance
28
Q

What are the parts of the social system?

A

Social system
Sub systems
Institutions
Status roles
Individual actions

29
Q

What are the 4 basic needs of a system according to Parsons?

A

AGIL schema
Adaptation- economic system meets material needs
Goal attainment- political subsystem sets goals and allocates resources to achieve them
Integration- religion, education and media integrate people into society to pursue shared goals
Latency- the kinship subsystem provides pattern maintenance and tension management

30
Q

What are the two types of society identified by Parsons?

A

Modern: individual self interest, achieved status, universalistic standards
Traditional: collective interests, ascribed status, particularistic standards

31
Q

How does society change according to Parsons?

A

Change is a gradual, evolutionary process which occurs through the moving equilibrium; as change happens in one part of society, it spreads to other parts. Structural differentiation takes place where specialised institutions develop and take on the functions of the kinship subsystem, each meeting a different need.

32
Q

What is Merton’s internal critique of functionalism?

A
  1. Parsons assumes that everything in society is functionally indispensable but this is an untested assumption and functional alternatives can do the same thing that the nuclear family does
  2. Parsons assumes that all parts of society are integrated into a unified whole but instead of functional unity, some parts may have functional autonomy.
  3. Parsons assumes that everything performs a positive function for society but some groups benefit at the expense of others.
33
Q

What are manifest and latent functions?

A

Manifest functions are intended while latent functions are unintended. Merton gives the example of the Hopi Indians who dance in hopes of producing rain ( the manifest function ) which promotes social solidarity ( the latent function )

34
Q

What are the logical critiques of functionalism?

A
  1. Logical criticisms
    - functionalism is teleological ie it says that things exist because of their effect. However a real explanation should identify the cause befire the effect.
    - functionalism is unscientific because it isn’t falsifiable.
35
Q

What are the conflict perspective criticisms of functionalism?

A
  • marxists say that society isn’t harmonious like the organic analogy suggests, rather it is based on exploitation.
  • conflict theorists see functionalism as a conservative ideology legitimating the status quo.
36
Q

What are the action perspective criticisms of functionalism?

A
  • WRONG: functionalism is deterministic. Humans aren’t shaped by society, individuals create society through their ingeractions.
  • Functionalism reifies society and treats it as a distinct thing. The action approach says that the only social reality is the one individuals construct by giving meaning to their worlds
37
Q

What are the postmodernist criticisms of functionalism?

A
  • functionalism assumes that society is stable and orderly so can’t account for diversity and instability
  • functionalism is a meta-narrative. Fragmentation means that such an overall theory is no longer possible.