Theories & Questions Flashcards
Distortions
- distortion rule: procedures used to make our observations should not introduce distortions:
- From instruments used for measurements
- From observer/experimenter bias
- From sampling procedures
- From the environment
Observer bias
- occurs during the experiment/observation
- giving clues to subject or misinterpreting behaviours
- can occur during recording or analysis of data (especially during times of uncertainty)
- often unconscious
Replication
- basic idea of scientific experimental research is replication (to judge reliability) not statistical significance
- relevant to case study research
Paradigm
Set of laws, theories, methods and applications that form a scientific research tradition
Theory
- A collection of hypotheses about a specific phenomenon
- a set of assumptions about the causes of a behaviour and the rules that specify how the causes operate
Model
-a specific implementation of a theory
Principle
A generally accepted “fact” but it is not always tested
Rule
-a generally accepted process or pattern, sometimes mathematically defined
Law
Substantially verified
Hypothesis
- a statement used to test a theory or model
- a testable statement about the relation between variables
Quantitative theories
- mathematically/statistically inspired
- relationship between variables and constants are investigated
- rules, formulas, computational models are used
Qualitative theories
- verbal statements
- discourse based
- variables can be discussed, but not necessarily mathematically evaluated
Theories: levels of description
- descriptive theories: describe relationships between variables, no explanations given
- analogical theories: the relationships between variables explained via analogies and metaphors
- fundamental theories: complex new constructs and concepts are suggested
Domain or scope of theories
- can be broad or narrow
- eg. Theory of evolution vs super-male testosterone theory of autism
Roles of theory in science
- to describe phenomena
- to understand phenomena: finding the cause
- to predict phenomena
- explaining phenomena: organizing and interpreting results
- to generate research: heuristic value of theories
A good theory:
- Can account for the data collected
- Has explanatory relevance (logical soundness)
- Is testable: can be verified/confirmed or disconfirmed
Testable=falsifiable - Predicts novel events
- Is parsimonious (simple)
Steps in developing theories
- Defining the scope of the theory
- Reviewing the literature
- Formulating the theory
- Establishing predictive validity
- Testing the theory empirically
Intervening variables
- a hypothetical variable used to explain causal links between other variables
- cannot be observed in an experiment
- inferred, summary of empirical data; operationally defined
Hypothetical construct
- an explanatory variable which is not directly observable
- eg. Concept of intelligence and motivation are used to explain phenomena in psych but neither is directly observable
- inferred but untested
- not operationally defined
- properties and implications not demonstrated in empirical research
Hypotheses
- asking questions = formulating hypotheses
- tentative explanation
- includes explanation or statement about relationship between two or more variables
- should be testable
Steps in experimental research
- Ask a question: from data, observations, theories etc. Develop research idea
- Make preliminary observations: pilot project, start to formulate hypoth.
- Make predictions from hypotheses that can be tested
- Identify variables to be measured; define the problem; give operational + ostensively definitions
- Select a research approach (correlational, observational etc)
- Select subjects/participants etc
- Observations and measurements: choose suitable environment, equipment, sampling method, recording etc
- Collect sufficient data: enough subjects etc to validate hypotheses
- Statistical analysis: exploratory or confirmatory data analysis; descriptive/inferential analysis
- Report you results
Alternative approaches: Beysian
- prior probabilities ( as opposed to frequentist approach)
- new inductivism
Alternative approaches: strong inference
- inductive inference
- process of elimination: develop several alternative explanations and test all predictions
- works well with high control in an experimental context
- popular in molecular biology
- works well with precise conditions
- reduces chances of a confirmation bias (tendency to look for confirmatory information and ignore contradictory info)
- to devise alternative hypotheses: use 2 preliminary phases before experiment:
- Exploratory phase: prelim observations and tests
- Pilot phase: mini-experiment with small sample