Experimental Designs Flashcards
1
Q
Factorial designs
A
- when more than one independent variable is used
- 3 main types:
- between subject
- within subject
- combination of within and between:
1. Mixed
2. Nested
- each variable or factor has 2 or more levels
- use ANOVAs to analyze
2
Q
Between subject designs
A
2 types:
- completely randomized
- Matched group designs (must ensure groups are equal so match one participant from one group with one from other group to ensure equal STD)
3
Q
Within subject designs
A
- also called repeated measures designs or randomized-blocks designs
- 3 main types:
- same subject observed under all treatment conditions
- same subject observed before and after a treatment (pre+post test design)
- subjects are matched on a subject variable (organismic variable or individual difference variable) and then randomly assigned to the treatments
- is actually a between subject design requiring a within subject ANOVA
4
Q
Within subject design advantages
A
- need less subjects
- each level of the independent variable is applies to all subjects, so we can evaluate how each level of the independent variable affects each subject
- each subject is its own control
- excellent for assessing experiments on learning, transfer of training, practice effects
- may help increase statistical sensitivity or power (subjects are not divided into groups, all subjects involved in all conditions)
- small n research benefits from within designs
5
Q
Within subject design disadvantages
A
- practice effects: participants get better at it over time
- (if not focus of study is a problem)
- solution: appropriate counterbalancing procedures can counteract effects + make treatment order an independent variable (change it to see if it has practice effect)
- differential carry over effects: lingering effect of one or more treatment condition (often an issue in drug studies)
- solution: recovery periods
- anti-depressants good example because some have long lasting effects
- violation of statistical assumptions: not enough people etc
- solution: use more strict significance level
6
Q
Carryover effects
A
- fatigue: decreased performance with time
- contrast: treatments are compared by subjects
- habituation or sensitization: more exposure to stimulus causes increased or decreased sensitivity
- adaption: tolerance (eg drug studies)
7
Q
Nested designs
A
- similar to mixed design but levels of factor A found under difference levels of a factor B ARE NOT THE SAME
- usually because of a constraint
- eg. Difference location
-groups would be: a1b1, a1b2, a1b3… a2b4, a2b5, a2b6
- spatial: multiple samples of a single tissue type within a rat
- estuaries are unique to each river
- temporal: sub-samples in time can only be sampled at one time and not another
-more economical but some interactions cannot be evaluated
8
Q
Interactions between variables
A
- interconnectivity
- variables: x, y, z
- main effects: x, y, z
- interactions: xy, xz, yz, xyz
- you have an interaction when the effect of two or more variables is not additive
- interactions make interpretation of experimental data more challenging
- a significant interaction will often mask the significance of main effects
9
Q
Additive interactions
A
- effect of each independent variable/factor doesnt interact with the other
- eg. Effect of phototherapy and melatonin on sleep quality. then the effects of PT doesnt impact melatonin, and melatonin doesnt impact effects of PT
10
Q
Interactive interactions
A
- when the effect of on factor plays a significant role on the effect of another factor
- may look like the lines of two factors crossing/meeting
- as one factor increases it may change how the other factor works or affects the dependent variable
- if the results of one factor depend on another factor there IS an interaction
11
Q
Ordinal interaction
A
- on a graph there will be no overlap of the of the data
- eg. Lines of PT vs no PT with melatonin dont cross/overlap but there is still an interaction
12
Q
Disordinal interaction
A
- looking at a graph of both variables there will be an overlap in data
- eg. Lines of PT vs no PT with melatonin dosage will cross over or overlap at at least one point
13
Q
Antagonistic interactions
A
- certain kinds of interactions can MASK the main effects of one or more variables
- eg. (Graph with lines creating X shape) the independent variable melatonin is effective, but the statistical analysis fails to reveal statistically significant main effects for melatonin
- analysis shows that there is no numerical difference in the averages, but the graph shows that the variables clearly have different effects
14
Q
Having too many factors/levels
A
- interactions will be harder to explain
- more factors equals more possible interactions
- need more power for more interactions