Theories of romantic relationships- social exchange theory, equity theory Flashcards

1
Q

what is an economic theory of romantic relationships?

A
  • Thibault and Kelley (1959)
  • similar to how business complete costs/benefits anaylsis
  • each romantic partner wants to maximise their benefits and minimise their costs when starting/ maintaining a relationship
  • this is the min-max principle
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

rewards and costs considered:

A
  • rewards= self-esteem, financial security, entertainment, sex, friendship
  • we are more attracted to these people
  • costs= giving up time, emotional instability, stress, losing financial security, opportunity costs
  • we are less attracted to these people
  • rewards and costs are seen more or less important by different people
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what is a comparison level (CL)?

A
  • estimation of how rewarding a relationship should be
  • compare out current relationship to previous relationships, other peoples and norms and values
  • acceptable CL changes over a lifetime and is linked to feelings of self worth
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what is comparison level with alternative (Calt)

A
  • people look at other potential partners and consider if they would get a higher profit
  • if higher profit can be found with an alt, the original relationship will end
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Evaluative research: Rosbult (1983) SET in relationships

A
  • longitudinal questionnaire study with 17 M and 17 F in straight relationships
  • relationships icluded costs/rewards, investments and Calt
  • findings indicated that cost/ benefit applied less at the start of a relationship
  • considered more as relationships developed
  • costs/benefits were considered against alternatives who become more or less attractive over time that as satisfaction increased, so did commitment
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Evaluative research: Spreecher (2001) studied 101 dating couples

A
  • found as the availability of alternative partners increases so did commitment and satisfaction decreased
  • people are more satisfied when there are less alternatives
  • or satisfied people wont look for alternatives
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Evaluative research: research on activity dating couples could have low validity

A
  • very few couples will regularly intensively ‘rate’ their relationships as required by Rusbult
  • consideration of costs/ rewards are somewhat unconscious as a process
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is equity theory?

A
  • economic theory, with all the assumptions of SET
  • Hatfield (1979):
  • suggested the missing factor was fairness/ equity
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is equality in relationships?

A
  • more satisfied in a relationship if they feel the balance of rewards and costs between partners is similar or theyre getting what they deserve
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Balance in relationships:

A
  • both partners profits- loss= should be the same
  • even for different profits and losses
  • one partner may put a lot into it without getting a lot out, while the other gets much less out, but puts a lot in
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

what is an over-benefit?

A
  • if one partner gets more overall profit
  • they will feel shame and pity towards the other, other partner may feel guilty
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

what is an under- benefit?

A

if one partner gets overall costs
- they will feel resentful and become angry towards the other

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Change in perspective of costs/rewards:

A
  • over time what is considered unfair may change
  • early in the relationship attraction should be seen as more important than equity
  • Hatfield (2011) suggests that in later stages, successful couples are less likely to ‘keep score’
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Research support on equity theory: Utne (1984) equity in marriage

A
  • used self report methods of newly weds, that had been together at least 2 years
  • recorded perceived level of equity, measure of stability and distress
  • partners that had more equity thought the relationship was more stable and happier
  • no sex difference in how equity works
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Utne (1984) equity in marriage : criticisms- correlational

A
  • correlational
  • rather than lack of equity= dissatisfaction
  • it may be that dissatisfaction= more unequal levels of equity
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Evaluation of SET/Equity theory: assumes people are calculating in relationships

A
  • assumes people are logical in calculating relationship decisions
  • there are many examples of illogical individuals that have started relationships according to SET
  • e.g, people in abusive relationships with little affection
17
Q

Evaluation of SET/Equity theory: consider individuals interpretation of rewards/ costs

A
  • people have different perceptions on rewards/costs
  • able to describe a range of individual differences in relationships
18
Q

Evaluation of SET/Equity theory: when relationships enter maintenance

A
  • as they enter maintenance, physical attraction becomes less important
  • SET/Equity theory explains this more accurately
19
Q

Evaluation of SET/Equity: too simplistic

A
  • doesnt consider role of equality within a relationship
  • as long as both have profit, it will continue
  • if one has more profit than the other, one is likely to become dissatisfied
  • Rusbult’s extension considers the investment size rather than just costs or benefits
20
Q

Evaluation of SET/Equity: theory may be culturally bias

A
  • collectivist societies= individual satisfaction is less important as relationships are often arranged
  • avoiding shame may play more of a role in maintenance
  • consideration of profit/ costs by the family is present at the beginning of the relationship