Theories of romantic relationships- Rusbult's investment model Flashcards
what is the investment theory ?
- developed from SET
- when deciding to continue a relationship, potential alternative relationships and how much has already been invested are considered
Equation on commitment:
commitment= satisfaction- alternatives+ investment
what is investment size?
- what distinguishes investment from rewards/costs is once its invested into a relationship
- can’t be easily recovered in a breakup and hard to split
- because they may not be the same before and after
what is extrinsic investment?
- resources that used to be outside the relationship but have become strongly associated
- shared friendships/ memories
- shared possessions
- activities that have become associated
two types of investment?
- intrinsic
- extrinsic
what is intrinsic investment?
- resources put directly into the relationship
- emotional work
- time spent
- self disclosures
characteristics of investments:
- can be rewarding or costly
- shared friendships= rewarding
- money investments= costly
how investment affects commitment?
- commitment is increased by the amount of investment
- a person feels locked into the connection
- ending it would mean sacrificing resources
research on the investment theory: Rusbult (1983) Testing the investment model in relationships
- longitudinal questionnaire using 17 M and 17 straight couples
- questions included rewards, costs, comparison to alternative and investment
- findings indicated as relationships developed:
- increased investment size = greater commitment and a reduction in perception of the quality of alternatives
Rusbult (1983) Testing the investment model in relationships criticisms: low validity
- could have low validity
- few couples will regularly ‘rate’ their relationship like he requires
- consideration of investments are likely to be an unconscious process
research on the investment theory: Rhatigan and Axsom (2006) used the model as a scale
- used the scale measuring commitment, investment, alternatives and satisfaction on women who suffered partner abuse
- findings supported the models predictions
- higher commitment was linked to women who had made the most investments
- BUT these findings may not generalise to women outside of abusive relationships
Evaluating the investment model: differing considerations of what is considered investment
- Le and Agnew (2003)
- meta analysis demonstrated that the model applies to at least 5 different cultures and homosexual couples
Evaluating the investment model: correlational methods of research
- it could be that high investment is a result of high commitment not the other way around
Evaluating the investment model: able to explain relationships equity and SET theories cant
- explains why abused partners with low profits will remain in these relationships
- how a satisfying relationship may end due to the presence of an attractive alternative and low investments
Evaluating the investment model: good explanation for the endurance of long term relationships
- good at explaining the endurance of long term relationships
- not helpful in explaining how early relationships are able to survive difficulties, when investment costs are low