Theories of punishment Flashcards
what is punishment?
the infliction or imposition of a penalty as retribution for an offence
punishment not revenge
what is revenge, and how does it differ from punishment?
- vengeful feelings
- not necessarily a response to a breach of law or code of conduct
Walker 1991 - 7 features of punishment
1) involves infliction of something that is unwelcome to recipient
2) infliction is intentional and done for a reason
3) those who order it are regarded as having the right to do so
4) the occasion for the infliction is an action that infringes a law, rule or custom
5) person punished has played a voluntary party infringement
6) punisher’s reason for punishment is such as to offer a justification for doing so
7) It is the belief or intention of the person who orders something to be done
why punish?
- protect society
- prevent future offending
- rehab
- deterrence
- help the victim
what is manslaughter?
unlawful act involving danger of some harm, that resulted in death
what is murder?
intent to kill or cause grievous bodily harm
what is retribution?
idea that harm done to society by offender should be counterbalanced by proportionate punishment
maintains that punishment is a deserved consequence of behaviour
punishing is a duty of us all
only offender should suffer
what is the utilitarian theory of punishment?
punishment justified by anticipated future consequences
punishment is for common good
punishment useful because there is a reduction of frequency of crime, deterrence, and putting offender where they can offend no longer
useful for rehabilitation and reduction of offending
it is okay if more than one offender suffers for the greater good
public opinion of utilitarian and retributive theories
- 2 of 5 “give offender what they deserve”
- 3 of 5 endorse aims such as deterrence, public protection and reform
however, this can change depending on the specific case
what is individual deterrence vs general deterrence
individual = deterring specific individual
general = inhibiting effect of sanctions on the criminal activity of other people
what would the different approaches say about the death penalty/homicide?
retribution = crime so severe that it deserves the death penalty
utilitarian = eliminates the danger, acts as deterrence, educates people that murder is evil, satisfies the outraged
humanitarian approach = rehabilitation
what is the humanitarian approach?
clear that offenders come from disadvantaged backgrounds
given this deprivation and victimisation, it might be argued that offenders are deserving of rehabilitation
what is the just deserts theory?
- punishment should be fair, and that severity of crime should relate to severity of punishment
- retrospective rather than prospective
- punisher doesn’t need to be concerned with future outcomes, only providing punishment to the given harm
- decided by magnitude of harm and extenuating circumstances
what is the deterrence theory?
- offender’s punishment should be just sufficient to prevent future instances of the offense.
what is incapacitation theory?
aims to make it impossible for a person who has offended before to offend again