public and crime: attitudes towards the criminal justice system Flashcards
what is the criminal justice system
governmental organisations and practices that serve to both control crime and maintain control on the population
includes punishment for violations of the law
what are the priorities of the CJS
- reduce offending by using skills of public, private, and voluntary sectors
- reduce youth crime by putting education at the centre of youth justice
- build a maximum value for money prison system
- reduce cost of legal aid and ensure it helps cases that genuinely need it
- improve the way courts are run and put victim first
why should the public be heard?
public voice and opinion are core principles of democracy
without public involvement, CJS would be unable to operate (reporting of crimes, witnesses, jury system)
what does public opinion do?
- creates boundaries which community will accept
-can be misinformed about CJS
what can misinformation about CJS lead to?
media reports are often biased and selective, which can result in low confidence in the CJS and therefore reduce reports of crime and encourage criminals
what is restorative justice
recognition of the community, rather than criminal justice agencies, as the prime site of crime control
crime defined as injury to victims and community peace
government should be responsible for preserving order, and community for establishing peace
what is required for restorative justice to work
- public preference in less serious cases particularly for property/juvenile offenders
- confidence that serious offenders do not pose a threat, and that victim is satisfied with outcome
what is the problem with public opinion?
public opinion is vital to CJS, however this opinion needs to be based on all the facts
e.g., opinion that CJS is too lenient may come from lack of knowledge and understanding of how CJS operates
what are some common misconceptions about CJS
- belief that crime is increasing
- overestimations in the rates of violent crime
- lack of knowledge regarding sentencing
- underestimation of prison use for serious offenders
where does knowledge about CJS come from
direct experiences:
- jury duty
- witness
- secondary victimisation
indirect experiences:
- vicarious victim of crime
- knowing others who have been victims
- common knowledge
- media
what did Matthews et al find around jury duty (increased/decreased confidence)
increased confidence associated with:
- jury diversity
- adherence to due process
- process being considered to be fair
decreased confidence was associated with:
- poorly prepared cases
- poor quality evidence
- hearing of cases considered to be minor
what did Angle and Whitehead find around witnesses?
- 75% witnesses reported being satisfied with their experience of the CJS, dissatisfaction related to feeling that they were taken for granted, and intimidation by the process or environment
- experience as a witness influences witness’ opinion of CJS
secondary victimisation
actions of CJS can have effect of further victimising those who come to them as victims
fear of not being believed
process can be intimidating
only 5.3% of rape cases result in conviction