Theories About Interpersonal Relationships Flashcards

1
Q

Personal relationships defined as….

A

Quantitative- two, diadic encounters (one on one encounters)

Qualitative: Impersonal Interpersonal

What moves us closer to the interpersonal end?
Attraction, time, experiences ,talk self disclosure , uniqueness, irreplaceable.

“A voluntary commitment between irreplaceable individual who are influenced by rules, relationship dialectics, and surrounding contexts”(wood, 2005)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Relational Culture

A

Dyadic relationships develop a unique set of constitutive and Regulative rules that guide how partners communicate and interpret one another’s messages.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Relational Culture

A

Dyadic relationships develop a unique set of constitutive and Regulative rules that guide how partners communicate and interpret.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

SocialExchange Theoty: Thibaut & Kelly

A

Evolved from the heuristic nature of symbolic interactionism.

Economic metaphor for interpersonal relationships.

Exchange resources or currencies

  • Rewards
  • Costs
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Relational Currencies

A

Physical

  • Money
  • Sex
  • Expertise
  • Work
  • Taking out to dinner
  • Protection

Psychological

  • Essential interpersonal needs (Schutz)
    • Inclusion
    • Affection
    • Control
  • Emotional Support
  • Compliments
  • Self disclosure
  • Face
  • Access rights
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Schutz Basic Interpersonal Needs

A
Bi-directional needs
 Give ---- Receive
-Inclusion
- Affection
- Control
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Currencies have idiosyncratic value

A
  • Liking
  • Supply and demand
  • Changeable…
    • Person to person
    • Time to time
    • Relationship to relationship
    • Culture to culture
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Rational for giving currencies

A
  • Dependency
  • Return of previous exchange
  • Obligating
  • Enjoyment
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Rationale for withholding currencies

A
  • Don’t think other will respond in kind
  • Don’t think it’s possible to return the exchange
  • Don’t have the time or resources
  • Feel relationship will suffer
  • feel they don’t need it
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Cost and Benefit Analysis

A

Satisfaction = Rewards > Costs

Dissatisfaction = Rewards

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

When is a Cost/Benefit Analysis Done?

A

We don’t always evaluate everything as a balance sheet

We DO when

  • feeling particularly good/bad
  • Have strong expectations for a good or bad outcome from and exchange
  • When we are contemplating the a change of a particularly high value currency.
  • When trying to manipulate others
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

How is a cost/benefit analysis done?

A

Time Frame - Analysis of current, past, and future encounters

Comparison Level- General, Alternatives Comparison levels

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Dialectic tensions : 3 most common

A

They both exist but it becomes a juggling act between the 2

autonomy & connection

Novelty & predictability

Openness & Privacy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Managing Dialectical Tensions

Neutralization 
Separation
Segmentation
Alteration
Denial
Reframing & Integration
A

Neutralization: Compromise both needs met but not completely (most people use this but in the long run it provides very mixed results)

Separation: Favors one need, dismisses the other, Typically the least satisfying tactic.

Segmentation: Meet the need in certain contexts, with certain folks, but not in other contexts, with other folks. Can be. Functional or very dysfunctional ex. Affairs

Alteration: switch back and forth

Denial: Ignoring the situation and pretending the need doesn’t exist (opposite of separation)

Reframing & Integration: Transcend the apparent contradiction to see dialectics as mutually enhancing.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly