theft Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

r v morris
FACTS

A

d switched labels in a supermarket to obtain a lower price one of the ds was caught before he paid

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

r v morris
LEGAL PRINCIPLE

A

there doesn’t need to be an appropriation of all the rights of an owner. The appropriation took place when there was a negative adverse interference

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

r v gomez
FACTS

A

d worked in a shop and conspired with a person who came in and used fake cheques t buy electrical goods. D convinced the store manager to accept these cheques

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

r v gomez
LEGAL PRINCIPLE

A

d argues property was given by managers consent but courts said if there is consent and d is dishonest to get it, there is still and appropriation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

r v hinks
FACTS

A

d, a young mother, befriended a 58yr old man called john who had been left money by his father and he was naïve, gullible and of limited intelligence. over 7 months d influenced and manipulated him into withdrawing £60,000 to her account

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

r v hinks
LEGAL PRINCIPLE

A

HofL said even though it was a gift there as still and appropriation - would an ordinary member of the public see it as dishonest for theft

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

oxford v moss
FACTS

A

d was a student of engineering and took an exam paper with the intention of returning it and had the intention of using the paper to cheat

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

oxford v moss
LEGAL PRINCIPLE

A

the confidential information contained in the paper didnt amount to intangible property for the purposes of the theft act 1968

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

r v smith
FACTS

A

smith arranged to meet jordan in order to buy some heroin from him. When jordan arrived at the meeting point the other appellants emerged from an alleyway to attack jordan. Jordan handed over the heroin after being attacked

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

r v turner
FACTS

A

d took his car to the garage the car was completed and the car was left on the road by the garage. D said he would collect it and pay for it the4 next day. instead he took it from the road without paying for it

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

ricketts v basildon
FACTS

A

d took a bag of clothes from outside a charity shop so he could sell them at a car boot sale

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

ricketts v basildon
LEGAL PRINCIPLE

A

the goods outside belonged to the person who donated them until the charity took possesion of it.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

williams v phillips
FACTS

A

a householder put refuse out for collection by the local authority refuse workers. They stole some of the propety

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

williams v phillips
LEGAL PRINCIPLE

A

it still belongs to the people who put them there

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

davidge v bennett
FACTS

A

D received cheques from her flat mates which where to pay for the communal gas bill. D spent it on Christmas presents and let the house without paying the gas bill

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

attorney generals reference (no1 of 1983)
FACTS

A

d, a police woman, received an overpayment in her wages by mistake. she didn’t say anything even though she noticed this. she didn’t withdraw any from her bank account

17
Q

attorney generals reference (no1 of 1983)
LEGAL PRINCIPLE

A

possible for a theft conviction as there was a legal obligation to return the money

18
Q

holden
FACTS

A

d took some used tyres and was convicted of theft. He argued it wasn’t dishonest as others did it and he though he was allowed to do the same

19
Q

holden
LEGAL PRINCIPLE

A

conviction quashed, judged subjectively

20
Q

r v robinson
FACTS

A

d was owed money (£7). D went to get it back and a fight developed which a £5 note fell out of a pocket, d picked it up and kept it

21
Q

r v veluumyl
FACTS

A

d was a company director who took money from the company’s safe and claimed he intended to return after the weekend

22
Q
A