Factual Causation Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

r v white
FACTS

A

The defendant put some poison in his mother’s milk in an attempt to kill her. She died that night because of a heart attack and not the poison. The defendant wasn’t liable her death as poisoning her kilo didn’t kill her

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

r v white
LEGAL PRINCIPLE

A

This case established the but for test - would the result occurred but for the action of the defendant if yes - the defendant isn’t liable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

r v pagget
FACTS

A

The defendant killed a police officer who tried to arrest him and subsequently attempted to use a pregnant girl as a human shield to defend himself The officer returned fire, killing the girl. The defendant was acquitted of murder but convicted of manslaughter which ne appealed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

r v pagget
LEGAL PRINCIPLE

A

The actions of firing at the police officer and forcing the victim to shield him from return fire was a more than minimal cause to the victims death

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

r v smith
FACTS

A

The victim was stabbed and taken to a medical centre. On the way to the medical centre he was dropped twice.at the medical centre he had to wait 45 minutes for treatment and the treatment he received was poor

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

r v smith
LEGAL PRINCIPLE

A

The defendants was still the legal cause of the victims injury’s because the original injury was an operating and significant cause

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

r v robert’s
FACTS

A

The victim hitched a drive, when the car started the driver touched the victim frightening her. Fearing she was going to be attacked she jumped out of the car causing some injury’s

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

r v robert’s
LEGAL PRINCIPLE

A

Is the victims own actions are reasonable and foreseeable, there wont be a break in the chain

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

r v dear
FACTS

A

The defendants daughter accused a man of sexually assaulting her. The defendant went after him and repeatedly slashed him with a knife. The victim received medical treatment but later reopened his wounds in what was thought to be a suicide attempt and died two days after the initial attack

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

r v dear
LEGAL PRINCIPLE

A

The defendants conviction was upheld as the wound was the operating and substantial cause of death

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

r v jordan
FACTS

A

The defendant stabbed the victim, the victim was taken to the hospital and given antibiotics after snowing an allergic reaction to them. He was also given an excessive amount of intravenous liquids. He died of pneumonia eight days after being admitted to the hospital.at the time of his death his wounds started to heal.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

r v jordan
LEGAL PRINCIPLE

A

The victim died of the medical treatment and not the stab wound. The defendant wasn’t liable for his death as the medical treatment he received was palpably wrong

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

r v blaue
FACTS

A

The defendant stabbed the victim and the victim was taken to hospital where she needed a blood transfusion. The victim was a Jehovahs witness and refused the blood transfusion and died

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

r v blaue
LEGAL PRINCIPLE

A

The thin skull rule applies where the defendant must take their victims as they find them

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly