The Widening Of The Cold War (4) Flashcards
When was Eisenhower inaugurated (start office as president)?
Jan 1953
Who was Eisenhower?
- President of US 1953-1961
- Liberal Republican (described himself as “middle of the road”)
- Background in military + foreign relations (Army Chief of Staff, then Supreme Commander of NATO)
How can Eisenhower’s liberal stance be seen in national policy?
- Democrats controlled Congress 3/4 time
- Continued The New Deal (programme of internal reforms proposed by Roosevelt in 1933 with aim of using gov resources to combat the Depression)
Who opposed The New Deal (US internal reforms)?
The rich (involved higher tax for them)
Who supported The New Deal (US internal reforms)?
Some politicians (E.g. Huey Long) believed it wasn’t doing enough to help the poor
Briefly outline Truman’s Cold War policy
‘IRON FIST’(HARD ON COMMUNISM)
- USA must retain sufficient influence in W.Europe (NATO)
- USA must retain sufficient influence in Asia (DPS, Japan, Korea)
- Soviets are threatening communist expansion which must be contained (Truman Doctrine)
- USA must retain strong conventional forces + nuclear arsenal, even if this uses lots of money + men (NSC-68)
Briefly outline Eisenhower’s Cold War Policy
NEED TO STOP COMMUNISM, BUT MORE PEACEFUL
- USA must retain sufficient influence in W.Europe (NATO cont, FRG join NATO)
- USA must retain sufficient influence in Asia (DPS cont, SEATO)
- Soviets are threatening communist expansion which must be contained (Truman Doctrine cont) + rolled back (NLP)
- USA must retain a strong nuclear arsenal, but reduce military spending + use of men (NLP)
What were the key similarities between Truman + Eisenhower’s Cold War Policies?
- Need to maintain influence in W.Europe
- Need to maintain influence in Asia
- Need to contain communist threat
- Need to have a military capable of dealing with the communist threat
What were the key differences between Truman + Eisenhower’s Cold War Policies?
- Eisenhower placed more emphasis on alliances
- Eisenhower also wanted to rollback communist threat
- Eisenhower wanted to reduce loss of money + men by reducing conventional forces + increasing nuclear forces
What alliances did Eisenhower strengthen/form?
- SEATO (Sept 1954)
- Baghdad Pact (Feb 1955)
- Strengthened relationship with FRG (joined NATO May 1955)
What was SEATO?
Southeast Asia Collective Defence Treaty (Sept 1954)
- Alliance of: USA, Britain, France, NZ, Australia, Pakistan,Thailand, Philippines
- Aimed to prevent communist expansion in SE Asia
- Provoked by Sino-Soviet Pact (May 1953)
Why did SEATO receive some criticism?
Only included 3 Asian states, leaving out many territories it had the intention of protecting (e.g. Burma, S.Vietnam, Laos, Cambodia), so some saw it as Western Colonialism
Why did SEATO struggle more to collaborate than NATO?
- No collective military force
- No collective way of gaining intelligence
What was the Baghdad Pact?
The Baghdad Pact (Feb 1955)
- Alliance between southernmost member of NATO (Turkey) + westernmost member of SEATO (Pakistan) to link together the two alliances + protect Middle East from communism
- Opened up for other states to join (Britain, Iraq, Iran)
Was USA in the Baghdad Pact? Why?
No
- USA joining would have implications regarding the Arab-Israeli conflict
How did restrengthening + allying with the FRG benefit the USA?
- Reduced chance of falling to communism (if weak)
- Reduced chance of independent threat (if unmonitored)
- Benefits of an alliance (influence + lower cost)
Why did Eisenhower have a greater focus on alliances?
Enabled him to keep sufficient influence in different areas, whilst lowering spending on defence (other countries could provide conventional forces if included in USA’s nuclear umbrella)
When did the FRG join NATO?
May 1955
What was the Soviet response to the FRG joining NATO?
- Recognised sovereignty of E.Germany
- Warsaw Pact
What was the Warsaw Pact?
Warsaw Pact (May 1955)
- Alliance to legitimise Soviet influence in E.Europe
- Presented as peaceful but had potential for violence
- Formed in response to FRG joining NATO