The social learning theory Flashcards
what was social learning theory to bandura?
- agreed with principles of behaviourism
- human behaviour requires recognising learning as a cognitive process
- which happens in a social context
what is observations involvement in social learning theory?
- others serve as a template for our actions
what is vicarious reinforcement?
- when we see someone being rewarded for a certain behaviour
- we mimic the behaviour to also try and be rewarded
What is vicarious punishment?
- seeing someone being punished for their actions
- makes us less likely to want to mimic it
- to avoid the same response
what is modelling?
- individuals we observe and emulate
- live models= family, friends, parents
- symbolic models= characters from movies or books
what is identification?
- we are more likely to imitate models that are similar to us
- e.g. gender, age
- or people who are perceived to be attractive or of a higher status
what are mediational processes to social learning theorists?
- human behaviour cant be fully understood without including the role of cognitive processes
- these happen between stimulus and response
what are the 4 mediational processes?
- attention
- retention
- motor reproduction
- motivation
- must happen between observing a model and imitating the behaviour
what is attention?
- to learn from a model
- individuals must pay attention to the model by focusing on specific behaviours
what is retention?
- the ability to remember the observed behaviours
- encoding the observed behaviours into memory
- for it to be retrieved later
what is reproduction?
- individuals believe in their ability to replicate the behaviour the model has demonstrated
- depends on individuals physical capabilities and remembered details of the behaviour
what is motivation?
- the willingness to perform the behaviour
- influences by the expected outcomes
- rewards and punishments
- based off observing the consequences of behaviour in others
how are behaviours internalised?
- behaviours are stored as memories for use when needed
- potentially long after the initial observation
what were banduras aims of the bobo doll study?
- to test SLT concepts of modelling and imitation
- wanted to see if children would copy aggressive behaviour demonstrated by an adult towards an inflatable toy
Bandura’s bobo doll- procedure:
- kids aged 3-6 divided into two groups
- 1st= observed an adult show physical and verbal aggression towards the bobo doll in a room full of toys
- 2nd= watched adult interact non-aggressively towards different toys
- experimenter observed and recorded the kids physical and verbal aggression behind a one-way mirror
Bandura’s bobo doll- findings:
- children shown an aggressive model were more likely to be aggressive for themselves
- identification was seen especially with boys
- more likely to mimic behaviour if shown male role model
- compared to those who saw aggressive female role model
Bandura’s bobo doll: 1963 variation- procedure:
- children shown real aggressive adult
- cartoon w/ aggressive cat
- recording of an aggressive adult
- all towards a bobo doll
Bandura’s bobo doll: 1963 variation- findings:
- findings indicated all comparable levels of aggression
- showing models live or symbolic are imitated
Bandura’s bobo doll: 1965 variation- procedure:
- looked at vicarious reinforcement
- watched adults be aggressive towards bobo doll followed by rewards, punishment or neither
Bandura’s bobo doll: 1965 variation- findings:
- children who observed the adult being punished displayed less aggression to the bobo doll compared to the kids in the other conditions
SLT evaluations: strength, supported by robust evidence
- supported by robust evidence
- bobo doll study done in controlled lab= high internal validity
- environmental control= pp followed same procedure in same room w same toys
- matched pairs design= control pp variables
- each group has an equal mix of aggressive kids
SLT evaluation: limitations, only demonstrated short- term social learning
- aggression may not be imitated weeks or months after the observation
SLT evaluations: limitations, lack ecological validity
- aggression in a controlled lab may not translate to real-world scenarios
- imitating televised violence in a school setting
- doubts about applicability of SLT to everyday life
SLT evaluations: limitations, relies on inferences
- research supporting SLT relies on inferences
- identification, vicarious reinforcement, mediating cognitive factors arent directly observable but inferred
- inferences could be incorrect
- true causes of behaviour could be completely diff