The behaviourist approach Flashcards
Defining features of learning theories:
- behaviour is learned through experiences and interactions with the environment
- Pavlov and Skinner lead theorists
what are stimulus response mechanisms?
- only possible to scientifically investigate what can be directly observed and measured
- what you do to something living and how it reacts
how are internal mental processes rejected?
- mind cant be directly observed
- argue it is a ‘black box’
- not suitable for scientific study
what is environmental determinism?
- behaviour is the result of experience
- behaviour can be predicted and controlled by manipulating the environment
what is classical conditioning by pavlov?
- learning by association
- unconditioned response can be triggered by a neutral stimulus through repeated pairing
- soon the neutral stimulus alone triggers a conditioned response
what was pavlovs research?
- neutral stimulus (metronome) that didnt give significant response
- unconditioned stimuli (food) that naturally gave a reflexive response (salvation)
Pavlovs procedure:
- paired neutral stimulus w unconditioned stimulus over several trials
- neutral stimulus presented just before unconditioned stimulus
- recoded dogs salivary responses
Pavlovs findings:
- dogs began to salivate bc of metronome and not just food
- even when food wasnt present
- dogs learned to associate the neutral stimulus with food
what is operant conditioning?
- learning by reinforcement
- does voluntary responses and learns by the consequences of those actions
- rewards= reinforce behaviour
- punishment= behaviour performed less
What was Skinners research?
- involved rats and pigeons
- used ‘skinner box’
- controlled environment used to study operant conditioning
Skinner’s procedure:
- animals placed in skinner box without prior training
- observed how the animals learned to operate leavers to gain rewards or avoid punishment
Skinner’s findings:
- behaviour is influenced by the consequences that follow
- rewarding consequences= more likely to be repeated
- undesirable consequences= less likely to occur
types of reinforcement?
- positive reinforcement
- negative reinforcement
- punishment
what is positive reinforcement?
- adding a pleasant stimulus to encourage a desired behaviour
what is negative reinforcement?
- removing an unpleasant stimulus to encourage the behaviour
- e.g. skinner gave an uncomfy electric shock but when the animal pushed the lever the shock stopped
what is punishment?
- discourages behaviour
- positive= adding unpleasant stimulus following undesired behaviour
- negative= removing a pleasant stimulus
what is extinction?
- if the reinforcing consequences stop
- then the person or animal will stop performing the behaviour
what is behaviour shaping?
- it is possible to train animals to perform complex behaviours through operant conditioning
- simple behaviours are rewarded
- then behaviours that are closer to the desired behaviour are rewarded
Classical conditioning: involuntary response
- unconditioned and conditioned reflex like responses are automatic
- not under control of the organism
- dogs doesn’t decide to drool at metronome it just happens
Operant conditioning: voluntary response
- behaviours are controlled by the organism
- produce behaviour with an understanding that certain consequences follow
- operates on environment
- to gain reward or avoid consequence
classical conditioning: acquisition of response
- explains how automatic responses happen through association with new stimuli
- initial learning phase
- two stimuli linked together= new learned response
operant conditioning: maintenance of responses
- explains how behaviours are continued or modified over time based on the types of reinforcement
Evaluations: strength, scientific
- studies objective variables and measurable stimulus response mechanisms
- measure systematically in highly controlled lab experiments
- use standardised procedures
- pavlov and skinners work=replicated
Evaluations: limitations, lack generalisatability
- animal findings may not be generalisable to human behaviour
- complex social and cultural forces behaviour
- humans= more illegent
- simple S-R mechanisms may not adequately explain human behaviour