The Person of Jesus Christ Flashcards
3 potential aspects of JCs authority
- As Son of God
- As a teacher of wisdom
- As a liberator
meaning of ‘son’ - hebrew/greek and how this was used in old testament
• In the East ‘Son’ or ‘Bar’ in Hebrew can mean someone’s actual son, but can also be symbolic to mean that someone is like someone else i.e. holiest person to ever have lived in JC’s case as he would be the person who shows what God is like more than anyone else.
• Old Testament
o Hosea 11:1 - the whole people of Israel are called God’s son; Kings of Israel also called Son of God
o Psalm 2:7 - in this context, used as a metaphor to mean a very holy person who was close to God.
o First Xians used the term in the OT to mean the Jewish Messiah who was the special servant of God.
o Only later that the term meant JC was divine.
o Incarnation of JC not found in early NT, at end of first century that John speaks of JC as God incarnate.
christology from above
• Christology from above - scholars who place emphasis on JC as divine. Has strong scriptural backing, particularly in John 1. JC becomes flesh and reaches out to humanity. Starting point of Christology used by Aquinas and Barth.
christology from below
• Christology from below - starts from the humanity of JC and then works its way towards JC being divine. Bible support within Matthew 1, who shows JC as coming from the house of David. Used by Pannenberg and J. A. T Robinson.
biblical support of JC as son of god
Scriptural support all comes from John’s Gospel. JC is recast as the incarnate Son, identified with the divine logos.
• John 14:6 - ‘I am the way, the truth and the life; no one goes to the father except me’
• It suggests JC has a unique connection and knowledge of God. Fundamentalists interpret this to mean that only Christian will go to heaven.
• John 10:30 - ‘The Father and I are one’
• Suggests that JC knew who he was. Supports higher Christological view that JC was the Son of God in the divine sense.
• John 14:28 - JC is about to go through the passion, he says that he is going to the Father, who is greater than him.
• Appears contradictory in that he is not the same as God, but that God is greater. Supports Christology from below.
problems with jesus’ humanity and divinity
o To save humanity, JC had to be divine as only God has that redemptive power
• If Jesus was God, did he really suffer on the cross?
• If Jesus didn’t feel pain, the resurrection is not real and Jesus was not human.
o If he wasn’t God he couldn’t overcome the forces of evil
• If he wasn’t human, he couldn’t overcome these forces for humanity
o If he’s not God, he can’t reveal the Father
• If he’s not human, he can’t reveal the Father
o If Jesus is fully human, was he corrupted as Paul writes in Romans 7:18-19 about humans?
• How could humanity be redeemed if not all of human nature was saved?
• Did the word replace the human mind and soul with divine one?
how did the church resolve the problems of JC’s humanity and divinity
o First Council of Nicaea in 325 AD decided JC is homoousios (same substance as the Father) and therefore is divine due to God.
o Council of Chalcedon in 451 AD decided Christ is two natures; the two come together in one person and hypostasis. It is not a mix; JC is fully human and divine, and has come together in one being.
3 possibilities of whether JC knew he was divine
- He completely knew he was God (scientia visionis)
- He was human, with a small knowledge that he was God (scientia infusa)
- He didn’t know he was God (scientia experiential)
rahner view of JC’s divinity
- Different levels to Jesus’ consciousness, multi-faceted layered approach
- Compares JC to an onion and its many layers
- Layers on surface show humanity e.g. human emotions
- Deeper within was a divine self-consciousness
- Knew he was human more so than divine
gerald o’collins view of JC divinity
- Cannot understand Jesus’ inner experiences as he left no writings
- Must show an appreciation of the complexity of knowledge e.g. reality, memory
- Consciousness is not the same as knowledge of a separate object. Consciousness always involves a degree of reflection
- It is very difficult to understand JC’s consciousness, ‘it was rather a self consciousness and self-presence in which he was intuitively aware of his divine reality’
how many miracles did JC perform
o 17 accounts of healing people, including 3 of people being brought back to life.
o 8 nature miracles
stanton view of JC’s miracles as proof for SofG
o Graham Stanton claims the various accounts suggest JC did possess a peculiar ability to perform miracles.
JC’s miracles as proof for SofG - mark 4:35-41
The Calming of the Storm
• JC and disciples go on lake, bad storm
• Disciples panic as JC is asleep
• Wake JC up, JC says ‘Quiet, be still!’ and the win dies down
• Disciples say: ‘who is this? Even the wind and waves obey him’
• Suggests they don’t know he is the Son of God
sanders view of JC’s miracles as proof for SofG
o E. P. Sanders says ‘the early Christians thought that Jesus was the Messiah, the Son of God and a miracle worker’
• Claims that Jesus as Son of God was a later development, as contemporaries do not depict JC a miracle worker, it is solely a Christian idea.
• Claim that the calming of the storm was coincidental, does not attribute it to any kind of divine power. Sanders feels that contemporaries did not think that his miracles made him Son of God, but someone who was close to God.
JC’s miracles as proof for SofG: mark 6:47-52
JC walking on water
• Disciples fishing, another storm
• ‘He was about to pass by them, but when they saw him walking on the lake, they thought he was a ghost’
• JC responds: ‘take courage! It is I. Don’t be afraid’
• It is I means ‘I am’ in Greek
• That is the title ascribed to God in the OT and the meaning of Yahweh is originally found in Exodus 3:14.
• Seems to be link between the miracle and deity of Jesus, suggests development of high Christology.
• By calling himself ‘I am’, JC is equating himself with God; Son of God takes deeper and spiritual meaning.
boring response to mark 6:47-52
• M. Eugene Boring claims that the response of the disciples suggests they do not yet understand the full significance of this event. This is different to Matthew’s perception of the event in that he shows the disciples praising JC (Matthew 14:33)
hume response to mark 6:47-52
• David Hume claims it is not possible to walk on water and that you must either trust or reject the story.
schillebeeckx response to mark 6:47-52
• Edward Schillebeeckx claims the story is spiritual and metaphorical, not meant to be taken literally.
wright response to mark 6:47-52
• N. T. Wright claims Jesus’ miracles show a greater authority than simply a power to alter the way the universe usually works: JC inaugurates God’s kingdom.
JC’s miracles as proof for SofG: john 9:1-41
- Man born blind
- JC asks why he was born blind, did his mother or father sin?
- JC said neither, born so God’s power can work in him
- Grabs mud, spits in it and rubs in man’s eyes, he can see again
- Pharisees find out, angry because it’s the Sabbath
- Pharisees speak to man and parents
- JC goes back to blind man and talks to him ‘do you believe in the Son of man?’ and then admits to being the son of man.
- Evidence for JC as son of God
- Or… metaphor for us being blind to knowledge of God until we meet JC
nestorius view of JC’s birth
• Nestorius argues that there are two natures of God: the divine and the human, completely separate and only became one when human JC became one with the will of God.
Apollinarius of Laodicean view of JC birth
• Apollinarius of Laodicea worried about the increasingly widespread belief that Logos assumed human nature in its entirety, felt Logos was contaminated by human nature. Worried that sinlessness of JC would be compromised. Argued that JC possessed a human mind, problematic as mind contaminated with sin. Came to conclusion that JC was fully divine, but not fully human.
generic criticisms of JC birth
• Human nature cannot be fully redeemed if Logos only took on part of human nature
• Docetism - JC is totally divine, humanity solely on appearance. Sufferings apparent rather than real. Deemed heresy as suggested deceitful God and fake atonement.
o Many people believe John’s gospel was written as a polemic against heresies that existed at the time e.g. Gnosticism and Docetism. This would explain the high Christology of John, mingled with JC as man. Raises issues of historical authenticity.
council of chalcedon ad451 response to criticisms of JC birth
• Council of Chalcedon AD451 said that JC is one person in two natures.
wright criticism of jC birth
• N. T. Wright - no pre-Xian Jewish tradition suggested the Messiah would be born a Virgin, no one used Isaiah 7:14 before Matthew, therefore story = surprising, unless it was true.
borg criticism of JC birth
- Marcus Borg - Does not accept birth stories as historical
- Cannot accept that Mark would have written a gospel without reference to the birth of JC
- Matthew and Luke trace genealogy of JC back to King David, suggesting virgin birth is not true
- Birth in Luke takes place in stable, house in Matthew
- Stories are metaphorical analogies
- ‘I do not see the story of the virginal conception as a marvel of biology that, if true, proves that JC was really the SofG. Rather, it is an early Christian narratival confession of faith and affirmation of allegiance to JC’