Pluralism and Society Flashcards
reasons for Gb being pluralist
globalisation
post enlightenment mindset
migration
refugees
reasons for Gb being pluralist - globalisation
o Increased interconnectedness of the global society including more trade across borders etc.
♣ Crane and Matten have terms globalisation ‘deterrorisation’ as travel and commerce is so much easier due to the liberalisation of laws
reasons for Gb being pluralist - post enlightenment mindset
o Societies have developed values based on reason and knowledge rather than on religion
o Steven Pinker: ‘the humanitarian principle’ – societies get on better when they take into account the need of others = tolerance
reasons for Gb being pluralist - migration
o Greater contacts between people, spread of ideas and faith
o E.g. Sikhs were able to migrate to GB post WW2 to help with reconstruction.
o Reasons for migration = asylum seeking, economic improvement etc.
o Some Xians feel overwhelmed by number of other Res
reasons for Gb being pluralist -refugees
o Migration is at top of public policy agenda
o Much media coverage on it, GBs fear that citizens are losing jobs due to cheaper ‘foreign’ labour
o Refugees and asylum seekers often come from differing faiths e.g. many from Syria are Sunni Muslims, turn up with Islamic traditions, customs, faith.
positives of globalisation
♣ Local economies have benefited
♣ Prosperous local communities
♣ Employment, technological advances in communities
♣ Investment and infrastructure, greater transport for people and products
♣ Greater social awareness e.g. Microsoft have updated the mission statement, ‘At Microsoft, our mission is to enable people and businesses through the world to realise their full potential’. Donated over $1bill to charity since 1983
♣ Lifestyles, fashion etc. have influenced each other from one side of the globe to the other
♣ Greater sense of religious tolerance (h, globalisation has undermined faiths that previously characterised the country)
result of pluralism
- More multi-faith communities in GB
- Prince Charles claimed he should be deemed ‘Defender of Faith’ rather than ‘Defender of the Faith’
- Easy to connect with different religious ideas due to different places of worship/English translation of texts
- People of different faiths work alongside eachother: school must teach about different faiths; supermarkets have food for different religious; multi-faith prayer areas in hospitals etc.
positives of pluralism
• Xians and non-Xians can work together to promote peace e.g. Near Neighbours
• Can think more deeply about own faith and note dedication of Muslims for example and assess if they are as devoted to Xianity
• Enjoyable to learn about other practices
Greater education of religions – more diverse, syllabus accommodates other religions
negatives of pluralism
• Damages uniqueness of the message of Xianity (Hans urs von Balthasar)
• May encourage Xian children to convert to another religion
• Squashes Xian zeal for evangelism
Xians are worried about inter-faith marriages
interfaith dialogue - the other
- ‘Other’ = someone unlike yourself vs. can show multiple interpretations of the world
- Jacques Derrida called the open ended view of the world ‘difference’
- ‘Othering’ can cause racism and sexism
- Dialogue allows for a greater understanding of other points of view
theological exclusivism and inter-faith dialogue - general
o Exclusivists would argue inter-faith dialogue would allow others to learn more about Xianity and eventually convert to it
o RAEs – we do not know who the elect are, must try and convert everyone
o UAE – we must show true respect to outsiders for dialogue to work. One must take a sensitive approach that incorporates pastoral care of non-Xians as some other REs do in fact reflect a ray of truth.
theological exclusivism and inter-faith dialogue - Michael barnes
♣ This is risky for Xians as they need to recognise the need to build bridges
♣ Tension within RCC for e.g. as they preach pastoral inclusivism AND soteriological exclusivism
theological exclusivism and inter-faith dialogue - Barth
♣ His theology emphasises the need for humility and openness when approaching RE dialogue
♣ Humans do not know when and where God will reveal himself
♣ Other REs are ‘lesser lights’ that reflect the light of Christ
♣ (H, still promotes form of RE imperialism)
theological inclusivism and dialogue - general
o Restrictive inclusivists – sceptical as to how much institutions can ever change and seeks to encourage individuals to change and dialogue
o Structural inclusivists – whole RE can lead to salvation, should try and understand the whole of Islam for e.g. and note the similarities/differences
theological inclusivism and dialogue - rahner
o Rahner – should be humble, tolerant, yet firm towards other REs