The nature of common law Flashcards

1
Q

ommon law rules predominate in some areas of law, such as torts and contracts, and are extremely important in other areas, such as corporations. Nevertheless, it has been far from clear

A

what principles courts use–or should use–in establishing common law rules

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Doctrinal propositions

A

propositions that purport to state legal rules and are found in or derived from textual sources that are generally taken to express legal doctrine e.g. precedent, legislation, treaties

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

social propositions

A

not accepted by judges in past cases BUT moral and policy opinions and views that enjoy widely accepted in society

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

When are doctrinal propositions invoked and social propositions

A

DP invoked as legal rules, SP invoked as reasons for the legal rules

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

First social function of court

A

resolve disputes based on society’s existing standards

  • court’s reasoning is based on these societal existing standards
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Second social function of court

why?

A

enriching the supply of legal rules.

  • limited time for Parliament to make laws, institution to respond to situation as they arise
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Einsenberg’s understanding of text-based theories of law and adjudication

in clear cases

A
  1. clear/ regulated cases: where cases fall under DPs/legal rule, courts are under a legal duty to apply those rules regardless of justification; and
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

First argument Einsenberg has against judges needing to exercise discretion in indeterminate/unregulated cases according to text-based theories of law and adjudication

A

By using their own discretion, this would undermine a social function of courts, to resolve disputes using existing social standards

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What if judges do not consult social standards in unregulated cases?

A

Judicial discretion aka judicial legislation undermines the rule of law and the separation of powers

The legitimacy of the judicial establishment of legal rules depends largly on reasoning that begins with existing legal and social standards rather than with those standards the court thinks best

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

How should judges decide indeterminate/unregulated cases

A

Judges should refer to social propositions in addition to DPs. i.e. existing community standards about morality or justice

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

How should clear/regulated cases be decided?

A

Usually rule is applied without its justification. SPs justify the rule

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Consider now (i) (ie the first thesis E associates with text-based theories):

The argument is that SPs are relevant even in these cases, even when there is no apparent ‘gap’ in the law. Why?

A

There is always a question as to whether a valid common law norm has continuing normative force, and this is what should (does?) guide judicial decisions about whether a rule should be consistently applied and extended or distinguished or, perhaps even, overruled

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Consider now (i) (ie the first thesis E associates with text-based theories):

The argument is that SPs are relevant even in these cases, even when there is no apparent ‘gap’ in the law. Why?

When a common law rule has a lot of force

A

it will continued to be applied e.g. Donohue Stevenson

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Consider now (i) (ie the first thesis E associates with text-based theories):

The argument is that SPs are relevant even in these cases, even when there is no apparent ‘gap’ in the law. Why?

When a common law rule little force

A

it will be overruled or distinguished

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

what does not justify legal rules and what does

A

Legal rules are not justified by DPs i.e. court applies a rule because it is a legal rule. it is justified by SPs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

link between social propositions and DPs

A

Social propositions are used to justify doctrinal propositions and to support, when appropriate, changes to and departures from doctrinal propositions

17
Q

Einsenberg’s understanding of text-based theories of law and adjudication

in indeterminate/unregulated cases

A
  • court uses moral skills to fill in the gap and make new law
  • Court have legislative discretion to decide case based on what it thinks its best (Own morality and preferences)
  • acting like a legislator
18
Q

Tenet of text based theories of law and adjudication

A

DPs has force and courts have duty to apply the rule b/c it was officially adopted w/o considering rule’s justification

19
Q

why does the legitimacy of the judicial establishment of legal rules therefore depends in large part on the employment of a process of reasoning that begins with existing legal and social standards rather than with those standards the court thinks best.

A

Courts not representative: judges of the same social and idealogical make up

20
Q

Another reason why SPs must be referred to

A

parties are aware or should know the social standards

21
Q

Positivists go wrong insofar as they pay no attention to

A

force of a rule, focusing only on validity.

Rule might be valid but have weak force

22
Q

When deciding a case, courts rarely consider whether a rule is

A

valid, it considers the force of the rule i.e. should it be applyed and extended or overturned

23
Q

When deciding if a rule has force, court will need to

A

take into account SPs

24
Q

when does a rule has no legal or moral force

A

When the rule is valid but drained of normativity

25
Q

DPs adopted in precedent may be

A

valid and binding in a weak and formal sense but have no substantive force

26
Q

A common law norm’s legal force depends principally on the answer to two questions

A

does the DP cohere with other accepted DPs? Is it congruent with applicable SPs?

27
Q

Is Eisenberg’s theory a positivist theory?

A

Eisenberg does not think judges should attempt to give any moral justification of the law. To the extent morality is relevant it is that to be found in SPs (akin to what Hart called positive morality, ie the moral standards generally accepted in the communit