The Middle East: Conflict, Crisis and Change (Chapters 1 and 2) Flashcards
What was the McMahon-Hussen Agreement of 1915 and what did it result in?
- An agreement made at the start of WW1 between the British and the Arabs whereby the Arabs agreed to help defeat the Ottomans (who were allies of Germany) in return for support for arab independence after the war
- The Ottomon Empire was defeated with the Arabs help and the Arabs were freed from Ottoman opression, however they were unaware that the British troops occupying Palestine intended to stay and two other contradictory agreements had been made
What was the Sykes-Picot Agreement of 1916 and what did it result in?
- An agreement made between Britain and France to divide up the Ottomon Empire after the war to ensure acess to oil supplies and the Suez Canal
- France was to be mandated Syria and Lebanon, while Britain was to be mandated Palestine
- This completely ignored the McMahon-Hussein agreement as the Arabs of Palestine were not free with Britain occupying their land
What was the Balfour Declaration of 1917, why was it written and what did it result in?
- An agreement made between Britain and the Jewish community which said that Britain would support Zionist ambitions to establish a home for Jews in Palestine provided it did not harm the rights of Arabs living there
- It was made to improve relations with Jews internationally, particularily in the USA, so that they would pressure their governments into helping the war effort more, and be sympathetic with British interests in the Middle East going in to the future
- As a result, when Britain was given the mandate for Palestine, they allowed for Jewish immigration provided it did not cause Arab violence. This agreement completely undermined the McMahon-Hussain Agreement
It was a letter sent from Lord Arthur Balfour to Baron Rothschild, a leader of the British Jewish community
What were the terms of the British Mandate to Palestine (1923) and what were the reactions from Arabs and Jews
- The League of Nations approved Britains mandate to Palestine provided they respected the rights of Palestinian Arabs and also endeavoured to establish a homeland for Jews and prepare the country for independence - an impossible balancing act
- Arabs were outraged, they had not been granted independence, not been consulted over the terms of the mandate - Ottoman oppression had simply been swapped out for British oppression
- However for the Jews, the Mandate enabled the Zionist dream to come true
How did the number of Jews change between 1922 and 1936 and why?
- Due to the terms of the mandate and the Balfour Declaration, many Jews immigrated to Palestine, encouraged by the newly set up Jewish Agency which helped them immigrate, buy land and organise schools
- In 1922, Jews comprised about 11% of the total population, in 1931 this number rose to 17%, and in 1936, mostly due to Hitlers anti-Semetic policies, this number rose to 28%
The Haganah was set up at this point to protect the new settlements
What were some initial Arab reactions to Jewish immigration?
- They felt Britain were favouring the Jews, and that the Jews were stealing their land and independence
- This disapprobation led to violence, the most pertinent example being on May Day 1921 when Arabs in the city of Jaffa attacked Jews after a rumour Jews were attacking Arabs, resulting in 47 Jewish and 48 Arab deaths
- Anger over ownership of holy sites in Jerusalem led to 4 days of riots, resulting in 133 Jewish and 116 Arab deaths
At this point the Jewish terroist organisation Irgun was estbalished as they felt the British were not protecting them enough
What was the Arab Strike of 1936?
- A full blown Arab Strike where Arabs refused to work or paytaxes until Jewish immigration and land ownership was ended and the Arabs were given independence
- There was also violence against British infrastructure
- The British reacted harshly, with many Arabs being arrested and flogged. Finally in October, at the behest of neighbouring Arab states, the strike ended
What were the causes and proposals of the Peel Commision (1936-37)?
- It was a commision drawn up by William Peel to investigate the causes of unrest in Palestine
- They surmised that the Mandate could never succeed as there was no common ground between Jews and Arabs, and that the only sustainable solution was to introduce a partition
- Therefore, the south was to belong to the Arabs, the north to the Jews, and the central part including Jerusalem to remain British, with all Jewish immigration to the Arab part being banned
What were the reactions and effects of the Peel Commision (including Arab Revolt)?
- Despite disliking the details such as not controlling Jerusalem, most Jews approved the plan
- However Arabs were furious at giving land to Jews at all, especially because it included lots of fertile land and meant 300000 Arabs would have to live in the Jewish state unless they moved
- This resentment turned to action at attacks against British troops increased, known as the Arab Revolt of 1937-1939
- The British and the Haganah responsed harshly, arresting and killing thousands of Arabs without trial, potential rebels persecuted and prisoners tortured
- When the revolt ended in 1939, the Palestinian Arabs were in a very weak position, with 5000 of them dead and all of the leaders arrested or exiled, though with much resentment for the British and the Jews
How did the Second World War affect British attitudes towards Palestine and what was the Jewish reaction?
- Due to the need for reliable oil supply routes during the war, Arab co-operation was necessary, so the proposals of the Peel Commision were shelved and never put into action, much of the oppression ended, and Jewish immigration limited to 10000 a year for 5 years
- Jews were outraged as Nazi persecution in Europe was now at its peak, and many protests broke out
- However, at least for the duration of the war Jews and Arabs agreed a truce with Britain was necessary until the Nazis were defeated, though a branch of Irgun disagreed with this and formed the group Lehi who continued attacking British infrastructure and troops
How did the Holocaust affect British and international attitudes towards Palestine?
- As allied troops liberated concentration camps, the full horrors of the Nazis were uncovered
- This greatly increased sympathy internationally and from the British, and many Zionists were demanding a creation of a Jewish state, though they still needed to balance the demands of the Arabs
- After the war, Ernest Blevin, the British foreign secretary, said a maximum of 1500 Jews could immigrate a month, an increase from the start of the war, but still not very high as he wanted to prevent a civil war between Arabs and Jews and still valued the importance of good relations with neighbouring Arab states on the basis of oil
What were the causes of the Jewish insugency in Palestine of 1945-47
Jews were angered by Britains policy of restricting Jewish immigration and not creating a fully independent Jewish state, especially in light of the holocaust
What was done and by who in the Jewish insurgency in Palestine of 1945-47?
- Extremist groups like Irgun and Lehi waged a campgain of violence against the British to force them to remove their troops by making occupation unfeasible and change policies, and horrify the British public into campaigning for withdrawal, by doing things such as blowing up British trains and bridges, and even killing British troops
- The worst of their violent acts was the bombing of the King David Hotel where the British Mandate administration were located in 1946, where Irgun members infiltrated the basement and then placed and detonated explosives there, killing 91 people including 28 Britons, 31 Arabs and 17 Jews
- Moderate groups like the Haganah only wanted to encourage Jewish immigration and increase international sympathy for Jews
What were the effects of Jewish terrorism on Britain and their stances in Palestine?
- It caused outrage, with the Haganah publicly criticising the Irgun and Britain cracking down on Jewish groups, including random searches and curfers of Jews
- It also made their occuptation increasingly costly for money and lives, especially in the recovering post WW2 Britain, meaning their was pressure from the British public
- However, British policy on immigration remained unchanged for as long as they had the Mandate
What was the British naval blockade around Palestine and what impact did it have on Jewish immigration and attitudes towards Jewish immigration (mention SS Exodus)?
- Since Britain had imposed restrictions on the number of Jewish immigrants allowed into Palestine, they maintained a naval blockade to prevent the entry of illegal immigrant ships
- Very few ships did get through, but everytime a ship was turned away or the refugees sent to Cyprus, international sympathy and sympathy from the British public increased
- A significant example is when the Haganah organised a ship full of 4500 Jewish immigrations to be sailed from France to Palestine only to be denied by the Royal Navy - the immigrations then proceeded to refuse the ship and go on a hunger strike
- When Britain then forced the immigrants to go back to refugee camps, this caused global outrage and increased sympathy for the Jewish cause